TY - JOUR T1 - Toward Assessing Clinical Trial Publications for Reporting Transparency JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.01.12.21249695 SP - 2021.01.12.21249695 AU - Halil Kilicoglu AU - Graciela Rosemblat AU - Linh Hoang AU - Sahil Wadhwa AU - Zeshan Peng AU - Mario Malički AU - Jodi Schneider AU - Gerben ter Riet Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/15/2021.01.12.21249695.abstract N2 - Objective To annotate a corpus of randomized controlled trial (RCT) publications with the checklist items of CONSORT reporting guidelines and using the corpus to develop text mining methods for RCT appraisal.Methods We annotated a corpus of 50 RCT articles at the sentence level using 37 fine-grained CONSORT checklist items. A subset (31 articles) was double-annotated and adjudicated, while 19 were annotated by a single annotator and reconciled by another. We calculated inter-annotator agreement at the article and section level using MASI (Measuring Agreement on Set-Valued Items) and at the CONSORT item level using Krippendorff’s α. We experimented with two rule-based methods (phrase-based and section header-based) and two supervised learning approaches (support vector machine and BioBERT-based neural network classifiers), for recognizing 17 methodology-related items in the RCT Methods sections.Results We created CONSORT-TM consisting of 10,709 sentences, 4,845 (45%) of which were annotated with 5,246 labels. A median of 28 CONSORT items (out of possible 37) were annotated per article. Agreement was moderate at the article and section levels (average MASI: 0.60 and 0.64, respectively). Agreement varied considerably among individual checklist items (Krippendorff’s α= 0.06-0.96). The model based on BioBERT performed best overall for recognizing methodology-related items (micro-precision: 0.82, micro-recall: 0.63, micro-F1: 0.71). Combining models using majority vote and label aggregation further improved precision and recall, respectively.Conclusion Our annotated corpus, CONSORT-TM, contains more fine-grained information than earlier RCT corpora. Low frequency of some CONSORT items made it difficult to train effective text mining models to recognize them. For the items commonly reported, CONSORT-TM can serve as a testbed for text mining methods that assess RCT transparency, rigor, and reliability, and support methods for peer review and authoring assistance. Minor modifications to the annotation scheme and a larger corpus could facilitate improved text mining models. CONSORT-TM is publicly available at https://github.com/kilicogluh/CONSORT-TM.HighlightsWe constructed a corpus of RCT publications annotated with CONSORT checklist items.We developed text mining methods to identify methodology-related check-list items.A BioBERT-based model performs best in recognizing adequately reported items.A phrase-based method performs best in recognizing infrequently reported items.The corpus and the text mining methods can be used to address reporting transparency.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported in part by the intramural research program at the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not a human study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesCONSORT-TM is publicly available at https://github.com/kilicogluh/CONSORT-TM. ER -