@article {Alves2021.01.12.21249703, author = {Josilene D Alves and Andr{\'e} S Abade and Wigis P Peres and Jonatas E Borges and Sandra M Santos and Alessandro R Scholze}, title = {Impact of COVID-19 on the indigenous population of Brazil: A geo-epidemiological study}, elocation-id = {2021.01.12.21249703}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.01.12.21249703}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {This study aimed to analyze the geographical distribution of COVID-19 and to identify highrisk areas for the occurrence of cases and deaths from the disease in the indigenous population of Brazil. This is an ecological study whose units of analysis were the Special Indigenous Sanitary Districts. Cases and deaths by COVID-19 notified by the Special Secretariat for Indigenous Health between March and October 2020 were included. To verify the spatial association, the Getis-Ord General G and Getis-Ord Gi * techniques were used. High spatial risk clusters have been identified by the scan statistics technique. 32,041 cases of COVID-19 and 471 deaths were reported. The incidence and mortality rates were between 758.14 and 18530.56 cases and 5.96 and 265.37 deaths per 100 thousand inhabitants, respectively. The non-randomness of cases (z-score = 5.40; p \<0.001) and deaths (z-score = 3.83; p \<0.001) was confirmed. Hotspots were evidenced for both events with confidence levels of 90, 95 and 99\% concentrated in the North and Midwest regions of the country. Eight high-risk spatial clusters for cases with a relative risk (RR) between 1.08 and 4.11 (p \<0.05) and two risk clusters for deaths with RR between 3.08 and 3.97 (p \<0.05) were identified. The results indicate critical areas in the indigenous territories of Brazil and contribute to better targeting the control actions of COVID-19 in this population.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe do not receive external financing.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Because it is research with secondary data of public access using data in an aggregated form and without the nominal identification of the subjects, the opinion by a Research Ethics Committee was waived, according to the National Health Council Resolution 510/2016.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available in at https://coronavirus.saude.gov.br/boletins-epidemiologicos}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/13/2021.01.12.21249703}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/13/2021.01.12.21249703.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }