RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Ivermectin as a potential treatment for mild to moderate COVID-19 – A double blind randomized placebo-controlled trial JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.01.05.21249310 DO 10.1101/2021.01.05.21249310 A1 Ravikirti A1 Roy, Ranjini A1 Pattadar, Chandrima A1 Raj, Rishav A1 Agarwal, Neeraj A1 Biswas, Bijit A1 Majhi, Pramod Kumar A1 Rai, Deependra Kumar A1 Shyama A1 Kumar, Anjani A1 Sarfaraz, Asim YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/09/2021.01.05.21249310.abstract AB Objective Ivermectin has been suggested as a treatment for COVID-19.This randomised control trial was conducted to test the efficacy of Ivermectin in the treatment of mild and moderate COVID-19.Design Parallel, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial Setting: A tertiary care dedicated COVID-19 hospital in Bihar, IndiaParticipants Adult patients (> 18 years) admitted with mild to moderate COVID 19 disease (saturation > 90% on room air, respiratory rate < 30 and no features of shock) with no contraindications to ivermectin and willing to participate in the studyIntervention Patients in the intervention arm were given ivermectin 12 mg on day 1 and day 2 of admission. Patients in the placebo arm were given identical looking placebo tablets. Rest of the treatment was continued as per the existing protocol and the clinical judgment of the treating teams.Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was a negative RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 on day 6 of admission. The secondary outcome measures were symptom status on day 6, discharge status on day 10, admission to ICU, need for invasive mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality.Results A total of 115 patients were enrolled for the study of which 112 were included in the final analysis. Of them, 55 were randomised to the intervention arm while 57 were randomised to the placebo arm. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics of the two arms. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome, i.e. negative RT-PCR status on day 6 between the two groups. Similarly, there was no significant difference between the two groups in most of the secondary outcome measures, viz. symptom status on day 6, discharge status on day 10, admission to ICU, and need for invasive mechanical ventilation. However, while there was no in-hospital mortality in the intervention arm, there were 4 deaths in the placebo arm. As a result, all patients in the intervention arm (n=56) were successfully discharged as compared to 93.1% (n=54/58) in the placebo arm (RR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.2, p=0.019).Conclusion There was no difference in the primary outcome i.e. negative RT-PCR status on day 6 of admission with the use of ivermectin. However, a significantly higher proportion of patients were discharged alive from the hospital when they received ivermectin.Strengths and Limitations of the StudyThis study was randomised and double blind, thereby minimizing the chance of bias.All outcome measures except symptom status on day 6 were objective and placebo control was used for comparison.Only single repeat RT-PCR was done. So median time to viral clearance in the two groups could not be calculated.Severe cases were not included in the study.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialCTRI/2020/08/027225Funding StatementPrior permission was obtained from AIIMS, Patna administration for repeat RT-PCR tests. Ivermectin tablets were procured from the learning resource allowance of the principal investigator. Placebo tablets were provided by Sun Pharma Pvt. Ltd.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Patna, IndiaAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data can be made available by the corresponding author on rasonable request.