@article {Walsh2021.01.02.21249146, author = {Sebastian Walsh and Avirup Chowdhury and Simon Russell and Vickie Braithwaite and Joseph Ward and Claire Waddington and Carol Brayne and Chris Bonell and Russell Viner and Oliver Mytton}, title = {Do school closures reduce community transmission of COVID-19? A systematic review of observational studies}, elocation-id = {2021.01.02.21249146}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.01.02.21249146}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Introduction School closures are associated with significant negative consequences and may exacerbate inequalities. They were implemented worldwide to control SARS-CoV-2 in the first half of 2020, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. This review summarises the empirical evidence of their effect on SARS-CoV-2 community transmission.Methods The study protocol was registered on Prospero (ID:CRD42020213699). On 12 October 2020 we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, the WHO Global COVID-19 Research Database, ERIC, the British Education Index, and the Australian Education Index. We included empirical studies with quantitative estimates of the effect of school closures/reopenings on SARS-CoV-2 community transmission. We excluded prospective modelling studies and intra-school transmission studies. We performed a narrative synthesis due to data heterogeneity.Results We identified 3,318 articles, of which ten were included, with data from 146 countries. All studies assessed school closures, and one additionally examined re-openings. There was substantial heterogeneity between studies. Three studies, including the two at lowest risk of bias, reported no impact of school closures on SARS-CoV-2 transmission; whilst the other seven reported protective effects. Effect sizes ranged from no association to substantial and important reductions in community transmission.Discussion Studies were at risk of confounding and collinearity from other non-pharmacological interventions implemented close to school closures. Our results are consistent with school closures being ineffective to very effective. This variation may be attributable to differences in study design or real differences. With such varied evidence on effectiveness, and the harmful effects, policymakers should take a measured approach before implementing school closures.Evidence before this study A previous systematic review, published by some of us in April 2020, found good evidence that school closures are effective for the control of influenza, but limited evidence of effectiveness for coronavirus outbreaks. At the time there was no available empirial evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.Added value of this study This study is the first systematic review of the empirical evidence from observational studies of the effect of school closures and reopenings on community transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We include 10 studies, covering 146 countries. There was significant heterogeneity between studies. Some studies reported large reductions in incidence and mortality associated with school closures, however, studies were at risk of confounding and collinearity, and studies at lower risk of bias reported no association.Implications of all the available evidence The evidence is consistent with either no effect, or a protective effect of school closures. With such varied evidence on effectiveness, and the harmful effects, policymakers should take a measured approach before implementing school closures.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding to declare for the submitted work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:n/aAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll included articles are publicly available.}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/04/2021.01.02.21249146}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/04/2021.01.02.21249146.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }