RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Screening electrocardiogram in young athletes and military members: a systematic review and meta-analysis JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.09.13.20193706 DO 10.1101/2020.09.13.20193706 A1 Lear, Aaron A1 Patel, Niraj A1 Mullen, Chanda A1 Simonson, Marian A1 Leone, Vince A1 Koshiaris, Constantinos A1 Nunan, David YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/24/2020.09.13.20193706.abstract AB Objective To determine the effect of electrocardiogram (ECG) screening on prevention of sudden cardiac arrest and death (SCA/D) in young athletes and military members.Data Sources MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, BIOSIS, Scopus, SPORT discus, PEDro, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from inception to dates between 2/21/19 and 7/29/19.Study Selection Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, where pre-participation examination including ECG was the primary intervention used to screen athletes or military 40 years of age or younger. Accepted controls were no screening, usual care, or pre-participation examination without ECG. 3 published studies, and one conference abstract were identified for inclusion.Data Extraction In all four studies, risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and found to be generally high. Two studies had data extracted for random effects meta-analysis, and the remaining study and conference abstract were included in narrative review.Data Synthesis 4 studies (11,689,172 participants) were included, all at high risk of bias. Pooled data from two studies (n= 3,869,274; very low quality) showed a 42% relative decrease in sudden cardiac death, equating to an absolute risk reduction of .0016%. Uncertainty was high, with a potential 67% relative decrease to a 45% relative increase in those screened with ECG based on 95% confidence intervals (RR 0.58; 95%CI 0.23, 1.45). Heterogeneity was found to be high as measured with I2 statistic (71%).Conclusion There is very low quality evidence ECG screening decreases risk of sudden cardiac death in young athletes and military members. Decisions need to consider evidence that ECG screening could also increase risk of sudden cardiac death based on the findings of meta-analysis.PROSPERO Registration CRD42019125560Key Points ECG screening of athletes has been shown to be more effective than history and physical examination alone to diagnose conditions which put the athlete at risk for sudden cardiac arrest or death (SCA/D). Few data are available to answer the question of the effectiveness of ECG screening in preventing SCA/D in young athletes.We identified only four published accounts (3 full papers and one conference abstract) of non-randomized trials reporting on the effectiveness of ECG screening to prevent SCA/D in young athletes and military members. The quality of the published evidence is judged to be of very low quality to answer the question of whether ECG screening prevents episodes of SCA/D. No difference was identified between screened and non-screened athletes in data synthesis of two of the published articles eligible for meta-analysis (RR 0.58; 95%CI 0.23, 1.45).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialProspero: CRD42019125560Funding StatementNo funding was provided for this projectAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Systematic review of literature. IRB exempt.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesReasonable request for data will be provided after author contact.