RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Effectiveness of prolotherapy vs local anesthetic infiltration guided by ultrasound in the treatment of shoulder pain syndrome
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.22.20248223
DO 10.1101/2020.12.22.20248223
A1 Juan A. Lira-Lucio
A1 Guillermo Ochoa-Gaítan
A1 Lizeth Hernández-Escobar
A1 Christian I. Padilla-Rivera
A1 Berenice C. Hernández Porras
A1 Ángel M. Juarez-Lemus
A1 Jose Guillermo Ochoa-Millan
A1 Roberto J. Jimenez-Contreras
A1 Enrique Roldán-Rodríguez
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/24/2020.12.22.20248223.abstract
AB Chronic Shoulder Pain (CSP) is a health problem that affects almost 67% of the general population. Almost a third of patients with acute shoulder pain syndrome don’t respond to initial therapy with analgesics and need interventional therapy. Corticosteroid injection is the standard therapy. Prolotherapy has been demonstrated to be effective in other chronic pain syndromes, but not in CSP. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of prolotherapy compared to local anesthetic injection in the treatment of chronic shoulder painMETHODS Retrospective and comparative study of 77 patients from the National Institute of Oncology in Mexico City who received treatment for Chronic Shoulder Pain guided by ultrasound between 2017-2019. 57 patients were kept in the study for further analysis. 39 received infiltration with corticosteroids and 17 prolotherapy. Effectiveness of therapies was determined based on the decrease in VAS score in next follow-up session. Statistical analysis were performed with SPSS and RStudio Software.RESULTS 51% of patients with Chronic Shoulder Pain were unemployed. 84% of the patients needed 3 different types of analgesics before they received ultrasound guided local treatment. Prolotherapy was as efficient as local anesthetic injection, no matter basal pain severity or underlying shoulder diagnosis, despite prolotherapy being more used as treatment for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy.CONCLUSIONS Prolotherapy and corticosteroid injection guided by ultrasound have the same efficacy in pain relief for chronic shoulder pain in oncologic patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors report no involvement in the research by the sponsor that could have influenced the outcome of this work. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This is a retrospective study using clinical data from the clinical record of patients from the National Institute of Oncology (INCan)in Mexico City. The protocol has reviewed by Institucional Bioethics Committee "Comité de Ética en Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México" and ethical approval was given in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (Minutes of approval: INCAN 2019/0140).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request