RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional analysis of risk perceptions and mental health in a student cohort
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.21.20248467
DO 10.1101/2020.12.21.20248467
A1 Ru Jia
A1 Holly Knight
A1 Holly Blake
A1 Dame Jessica Corner
A1 Chris Denning
A1 Jonathan Ball
A1 Kirsty Bolton
A1 Joanne R Morling
A1 Carol Coupland
A1 Grazziela Figueredo
A1 David Ed Morris
A1 Patrick Tighe
A1 Armando Villalon
A1 Kieran Ayling
A1 Kavita Vedhara
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/22/2020.12.21.20248467.abstract
AB Objective This study examined the COVID-19 risk perceptions and mental health of university students on returning to campus in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods An online survey was completed during the first four weeks of the academic year (October 2020) by 897 university students. The survey included demographics and measures of experiences of COVID-19 testing, self-isolation, shielding, perceived risk, mental health and indices capturing related psychological responses to the pandemic.Results We observed higher levels of depression and anxiety, but not stress, in students compared with pre- pandemic normative data, but lower than levels reported earlier in the pandemic in other similar cohorts. Depression, anxiety and stress were independently associated with greater loneliness and reduced positive mood. Greater worry about COVID-19 was also independently associated with anxiety and stress. Female students and those with pre-existing mental health disorders were at greatest risk of poor mental health outcomes.Conclusion Although students perceived themselves at only moderate risk of COVID-19, the prevalence of depression and anxiety among university students should remain a concern. Universities should provide adequate support for students’ mental health during term-time. Interventions to reduced loneliness and worry, and improve mood, may benefit students’ overall mental well-being.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC), which had no further role in the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, and preparation and submission of the report. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the MRC. JRM receives salary support from a Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist Fellowship [grant number MR/P008348/1]. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was received from the University of Nottingham Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee (reference FMHS 96-0920).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be deposited in the University of Nottingham data archive. Access to this dataset will be embargoed for a period of 12 months in order for us to complete further analysis of the dataset. After that it may be shared with the consent of the Chief Investigator.