PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Hannah Lu AU - Cortney Weintz AU - Joseph Pace AU - Dhiraj Indana AU - Kevin Linka AU - Ellen Kuhl TI - Are college campuses superspreaders? A data-driven modeling study AID - 10.1101/2020.12.18.20248490 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.12.18.20248490 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/22/2020.12.18.20248490.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/22/2020.12.18.20248490.full AB - The COVID-19 pandemic continues to present enormous challenges for colleges and universities and strategies for save reopening remain a topic of ongoing debate. Many institutions that reopened cautiously in the fall experienced a massive wave of infections and colleges were soon declared as the new hotspots of the pandemic. However, the precise effects of college outbreaks on their immediate neighborhood remain largely unknown. Here we show that the first two weeks of instruction present a high-risk period for campus outbreaks and that these outbreaks tend to spread into the neighboring communities. By integrating a classical mathematical epidemiology model and Bayesian learning, we learned the dynamic reproduction number for 30 colleges from their daily case reports. Of these 30 institutions, 14 displayed a spike of infections within the first two weeks of class, with peak seven-day incidences well above 1,000 per 100,000, an order of magnitude larger than the nation-wide peaks of 70 and 150 during the first and second waves of the pandemic. While most colleges were able to rapidly reduce the number of new infections, many failed to control the spread of the virus beyond their own campus: Within only two weeks, 17 campus outbreaks translated directly into peaks of infection within their home counties. These findings suggests that college campuses are at risk to develop an extreme incidence of COVID-19 and become superspreaders for neighboring communities. We anticipate that tight test-trace-quarantine strategies, flexible transition to online instruction, and–most importantly–compliance with local regulations will be critical to ensure a safe campus reopening after the winter break.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was a class project of the course ME233 Data-driven modeling of COVID-19. It was supported by a DAAD Fellowship to Kevin Linka, by a Stanford Bio-X IIP seed grant to Ellen Kuhl, and by the Stanford School of Engineering COVID-19 Research and Assistance Fund.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:n/aAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are drawn from public databases. References to these databases are cited in the text and listed in the bibliography.