TY - JOUR T1 - SARS-CoV-2 infection, risk perception, behaviour, and preventive measures at schools in Berlin, Germany, during the early post-lockdown phase: A cross-sectional study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.12.18.20248398 SP - 2020.12.18.20248398 AU - Franziska Hommes AU - Welmoed van Loon AU - Marlene Thielecke AU - Igor Abramovich AU - Sascha Lieber AU - Ralf Hammerich AU - Sabine Gehrke-Beck AU - Elisabeth Linzbach AU - Angela Schuster AU - Katja von dem Busche AU - Stefanie Theuring AU - Maximilian Gertler AU - Gabriela Equihua Martinez AU - Joachim Richter AU - Clara Bergmann AU - Alisa Bölke AU - Falko Böhringer AU - Marcus A. Mall AU - Alexander Rosen AU - Alexander Krannich AU - Jan Keller AU - Norma Bethke AU - Marco Kurzmann AU - Tobias Kurth AU - Valerie Kirchberger AU - Joachim Seybold AU - Frank P. Mockenhaupt AU - on behalf of the BECOSS study group Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/19/2020.12.18.20248398.abstract N2 - Background Briefly before the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Berlin, Germany, schools closed in mid-March 2020 for six weeks. Following re-opening, schools gradually resumed operation at a reduced level for nine weeks preceding the summer holidays.Aim During this phase, we conducted a situational assessment in schools among students and teachers as to infection status, symptoms, affective, behavioural, educational issues, and preventive measures.Methods At twenty-four randomly selected primary and secondary schools, one class each was examined. Oro-nasopharyngeal swabs and capillary blood samples were collected to assess SARS-CoV-2 infection (PCR) and specific IgG (ELISA), respectively. Medical history, household and schooling characteristics, leisure time activities, fear of infection, risk perception, hand hygiene, physical distancing, and facemask wearing were assessed.Results Among 535 participants (385 students, 150 staff), one teenager was SARS-CoV-2 infected (0.2%), and seven individuals exhibited specific IgG (1.3%); 16% reported symptoms upon examination, and 48% in the preceding 14 days. Compared to before the pandemic, the proportion of leisure time spent as screen-time increased, and the majority of primary school students reported reduced physical activity. Fear of infection and risk perception were relatively low, but acceptance of adapted health behaviours was high. Governmental preventive measures were adequately implemented, with primary schools performing better than secondary schools.Conclusion In this phase of rare infection and low seroreactivity, individual and school-level infection prevention and control measures were largely adhered to. Nevertheless, vigilance, continued and proactive preventive measures, and well-rehearsed reaction options are essential to cope with increasing pandemic activity.Competing Interest StatementTK reports personal fees from Eli Lily, Newsenselab, Total, and The BMJ, outside the submitted work. Other authors: no reported conflict of interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by the Senate of Berlin. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (EA2/091/20).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available with the authors. ER -