RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The differential impact of physical distancing strategies on social contacts relevant for the spread of COVID-19: Evidence from a multi-country survey
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.15.20102657
DO 10.1101/2020.05.15.20102657
A1 Emanuele Del Fava
A1 Jorge Cimentada
A1 Daniela Perrotta
A1 André Grow
A1 Francesco Rampazzo
A1 Sofia Gil-Clavel
A1 Emilio Zagheni
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/18/2020.05.15.20102657.abstract
AB Physical distancing measures are intended to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, even though their impact on social contacts and disease transmission remains unclear. Obtaining timely data on social contact patterns can help to assess the impact of such protective measures. We conducted an online opt-in survey based on targeted Facebook advertising campaigns across seven European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom (UK)) and the United States (US), achieving a sample of 53,708 questionnaires in the period March 13–April 13, 2020. Post-stratification weights were produced to correct for biases. Data on social contact numbers, as well as on protective behaviour and perceived level of threat were collected and used to the expected net reproduction number by week, Rt, with respect to pre-pandemic data. Compared to social contacts reported prior to COVID-19, in mid-April daily social contact numbers had decreased between 49% in Germany and 83% in Italy, ranging from below three contacts per day in France, Spain, and the UK up to four in Germany and the Netherlands. Such reductions were sufficient to bring Rt to one or even below in all countries, except Germany. Evidence from the US and the UK showed that the number of daily social contacts mainly decreased after governments issued the first physical distancing guidelines. Finally, although contact numbers decreased uniformly across age groups, older adults reported the lowest numbers of contacts, indicating higher levels of protection. We provided a comparable set of statistics on social contact patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic for eight high-income countries, disaggregated by week. As these estimates offer a more grounded alternative to the theoretical assumptions often used in epidemiological models, the scientific community could draw on this information for developing more realistic epidemic models of COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded through the support of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, which is part of the Max Planck Society.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Council of the Max Planck Society, which did not require additional ethics approval for each of the countries included in the study. Participation in this opt-in study was voluntary and open to people who were at least 18 years old and gave their informed consent.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll the primary data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are currently stored in a secure and protected server at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, and are not publicly available in order to comply with data protection regulations in Germany, and to preserve the privacy of study participants. Replication data and R/Stata code for all our findings will be made available in the future once the appropriate privacy measures have been implemented to avoid identification of individuals in the microdata.