RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Development and validation of total and regional body composition prediction equations from anthropometry and single frequency segmental bioelectrical impedance with DEXA
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.16.20248330
DO 10.1101/2020.12.16.20248330
A1 Powell, Richard
A1 De Lucia Rolfe, Emanuella
A1 Day, Felix R.
A1 Perry, John R.B.
A1 Griffin, Simon J.
A1 Forouhi, Nita G.
A1 Brage, Soren
A1 Wareham, Nicholas J.
A1 Langenberg, Claudia
A1 Ong, Ken K.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/18/2020.12.16.20248330.abstract
AB Aims Single-frequency segmental Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) is commonly used to estimate body composition. To enhance the value of information derived from BIA, especially for use in large-scale epidemiological studies, we developed and validated equations to predict total and regional (arms, legs, trunk, android, gynoid, visceral) body composition parameters (lean mass and fat mass) from anthropometry and single-frequency (50 kHz) segmental BIA variables, using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) as the criterion method.Methods The 11,559 adults (age 30 to 65) from the UK population-based Fenland Study with data on DEXA, BIA and anthropometry were randomly assigned to a Derivation sample (4,827 men; 5,732 women) or a Validation sample (500 men; 500 women). Prediction equations based on anthropometry and BIA variables were derived using forward stepwise multiple linear regression in the Fenland Derivation sample. These were validated in the Fenland Validation sample and also in the UK Biobank Imaging Study (2,392 men; 2,606 women) using Pearson correlations and Bland–Altman models.Results and Conclusions Bland Altman analyses revealed no significant mean bias for any predicted DEXA parameter (all P>0.05) for the fenland population. Bias expressed as % of the mean was between -0.6% and 0.5% for all parameters in both men and women, except for visceral FM and subcutaneous abdominal FM (range -3.6 to 1.1%). However, in UK Biobank most predicted parameters showed significant bias: % mean bias was <2% in both sexes only for total fat mass and total lean mass, and was >10% for leg and visceral fat mass in both sexes. In conclusion, new equations based on anthropometry and BIA variables predicted DEXA parameters with sufficient accuracy to assess relative differences between individuals, and were sufficiently accurate to predict absolute values for total body but not regional fat and lean mass.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe also acknowledge support from the Medical Research Council (Unit programmes MC_UU_12015/1, MC_UU_12015/2, MC_UU_12015/3, MC_UU_12015/4 and MC_UU_12015/5). We are grateful to funding to RP and EDLR, who are supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Cambridge [IS-BRC-1215-20014]. The NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) is a partnership between Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Cambridge, funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Cambridge Local Research Ethics Committee (04/Q0108/19) National Health Service North West Centre for Research Ethics Committee (Ref:11/NW/0382)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe processes that relate to access to the Fenland study data are detailed at https://epi-meta.mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk/. All the data used in this study form the UK Biobank resource is available to bona fide researchers for health-related research in the public interest. Researchers who wish to access the data should contact UK Biobank for further details about access to this resource. Further details are available at https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/register.