@article {Ptasinska2020.12.15.20247031, author = {Anetta Ptasinska and Celina Whalley and Andrew Bosworth and Charlotte Poxon and Claire Bryer and Nicholas Machin and Seden Grippon and Emma L Wise and Bryony Armson and Emma L A Howson and Alice Goring and Gemma Snell and Jade Forster and Chris Mattocks and Sarah Frampton and Rebecca Anderson and David Cleary and Joe Parker and Konstantinos Boukas and Nichola Graham and Doriana Cellura and Emma Garratt and Rachel Skilton and Hana Sheldon and Alla Collins and Nusreen Ahmad and Simon Friar and Tim Williams and Keith M Godfrey and Zandra Deans and Angela Douglas and Sue Hill and Michael Kidd and Deborah Porter and Stephen P Kidd and Nicholas J Cortes and Veronica Fowler and Tony Williams and Alex Richter and Andrew D Beggs}, title = {Diagnostic accuracy of Loop mediated isothermal amplification coupled to Nanopore sequencing (LamPORE) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection at scale in symptomatic and asymptomatic populations}, elocation-id = {2020.12.15.20247031}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1101/2020.12.15.20247031}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Introduction Rapid, high throughput diagnostics are a valuable tool, allowing the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in populations, in order to identify and isolate people with asymptomatic and symptomatic infections. Reagent shortages and restricted access to high throughput testing solutions have limited the effectiveness of conventional assays such as reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), particularly throughout the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated the use of LamPORE, where loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is coupled to nanopore sequencing technology, for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic and asymptomatic populations.Methods In an asymptomatic prospective cohort, for three weeks in September 2020 health care workers across four sites (Birmingham, Southampton, Basingstoke and Manchester) self-swabbed with nasopharyngeal swabs weekly and supplied a saliva specimen daily. These samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using the Oxford Nanopore LamPORE system and a reference RT-qPCR assay on extracted sample RNA. A second retrospective cohort of 848 patients with influenza like illness from March 2020 {\textendash} June 2020, were similarly tested from nasopharyngeal swabs.Results In the asymptomatic cohort a total of 1200 participants supplied 23,427 samples (3,966 swab, 19,461 saliva) over a three-week period. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 detection using LamPORE was 0.95\%. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of LamPORE was \>99.5\% in both swab and saliva asymptomatic samples when compared to the reference RT-qPCR test. In the retrospective symptomatic cohort, the incidence was 13.4\% and the sensitivity and specificity were 100\%.Conclusions LamPORE is a highly accurate methodology for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in both symptomatic and asymptomatic population settings and can be used as an alternative to RT-qPCR.Competing Interest StatementCompeting interests: ADB has received travel funding to the Oxford Nanopore Community Meeting 2019 from Oxford Nanopore. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest.Funding StatementThe research in this study was funded by an unrestricted grant by the United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Care. ADB is currently supported by a Cancer Research UK Advanced Clinician Scientist award (C31641/A23923) and his laboratory is supported by CRUK Centre Birmingham (C17422/A25154) and the Birmingham Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (C11497/A25127).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:National Research Ethics Service Committee West Midlands - South Birmingham 2002/201 Amendment Number 4All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available on reasonable request and after central review}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/16/2020.12.15.20247031}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/16/2020.12.15.20247031.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }