RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluation of a novel approach to community health care delivery in Ifanadiana District, Madagascar
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.11.20232611
DO 10.1101/2020.12.11.20232611
A1 Bénédicte Razafinjato
A1 Luc Rakotonirina
A1 Jafeta Benony Andriantahina
A1 Laura F. Cordier
A1 Randrianambinina Andriamihaja
A1 Anna Rasoarivao
A1 Mamy Andrianomenjanahary
A1 Lanto Marovavy
A1 Feno Hanitriniaina
A1 Alishya Mayfield
A1 Daniel Palazuelos
A1 Felana Ihantamalala
A1 Rado J.L. Rakotonanahary
A1 Ann Miller
A1 Andres Garchitorena
A1 Meg G. McCarty
A1 Matthew H. Bonds
A1 Karen E. Finnegan
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/14/2020.12.11.20232611.abstract
AB Despite the widespread global adoption of community health (CH) systems, there are evidence gaps in how to best deliver community-based care aligned with global best practice in remote settings where access to health care is limited and community health workers (CHWs) may be the only available providers. PIVOT partnered with the Ministry of Public Health to pilot a new two-pronged approach for care delivery in rural Madagascar: one CHW provided care at a stationary CH site while 2-5 additional CHWs provided care via proactive household visits. The pilot included professionalization of the CHW workforce (i.e. recruitment, training, financial incentive) and twice monthly supervision of CHWs. We evaluated the impact of the CH pilot on utilization and quality of integrated community case management (iCCM) in the first six months of implementation (October 2019-March 2020).We compared utilization and proxy measures of quality of care (defined as adherence to the iCCM protocol for diagnosis, classification of disease severity, treatment) in the intervention commune and five comparison communes, using a quasi-experimental study design and relying on routinely collected programmatic data. Average per capita monthly under-five visits were 0.28 in the intervention commune and 0.22 in the comparison communes. In the intervention commune, 40.0% of visits were completed at the household via proactive care. CHWs completed all steps of the iCCM protocol in 77.8% of observed visits in the intervention commune (vs 49.5% in the comparison communes, p-value=<0.001). A two-pronged approach to CH delivery and professionalization of the CHW workforce increased utilization and demonstrated satisfactory quality of care. National stakeholders and program managers should evaluate program re-design at a local level prior to national or district-wide scale-up.Competing Interest StatementBR, LR, LFC, AR, MA, LM, FM, AM, DP, FI, RJLR, AM, MHB, and KEF receive salary support from PIVOT. JBA and RA are employees of the Ministry of Public Health in Madagascar.Funding StatementThis work was supported by funding provided by Conservation, Food and Health Foundation; CRI Foundation; IZUMI Foundation; MJS Foundation; Preston-Werner Ventures; Wagner Foundation. The funders played no role in study design, manuscript preparation, statistical analysis, or the decision to publish.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Madagascar's Ministry of Public Health approved this study. The Institutional Review Board of Harvard Medical School approved the study and determined that it was not human subjects research.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData remain the property of the Madagascar Ministry of Public Health. If interested in accessing the data, please contact the corresponding author who will help facilitate access.