RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: A qualitative interview study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.11.20247528
DO 10.1101/2020.12.11.20247528
A1 Denford, Sarah
A1 Morton, Kate S
A1 Lambert, Helen
A1 Zhang, Juan
A1 Smith, Louise E
A1 Rubin, G James
A1 Cai, Shenghan
A1 Zhang, Tingting
A1 Robin, Charlotte
A1 Lasseter, Gemma
A1 Hickman, Mathew
A1 Oliver, Isabel
A1 Yardley, Lucy
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/11/2020.12.11.20247528.abstract
AB In an effort to reduce the spread of COVID-19, the UK government has introduced a series of mitigation measures. The success of these measures in preventing transmission is dependent on adherence, which is currently considered to be low. Evidence highlights the disproportionate impact of mitigation measures on individuals from Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities, as well as among those on a low income, and an understanding of barriers to adherence in these populations is needed. In this qualitative study we examined patterns of adherence to mitigation measures and reasons underpinning these behaviors among people on low income and those from BAME communities.Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants from BAME and low-income White backgrounds. The topic guide was designed to explore how individuals are adhering to social distancing and self-isolation measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to explore in detail the reasons underpinning this behavior. Data were analyzed using ‘thematic analysis following which charts were used to help compare concepts within and between participants and develop an understanding of patterns of adherence.Participants were confused by the constantly changing and seemingly contradictory rules and guidance. As a result, decisions were made about how best to protect themselves and their household from COVID-19, and from the detrimental impact of lockdown restrictions. This was not always in line with government advice. We identified three categories of adherence to lockdown measures 1) caution motivated super-adherence 2) risk-adapted partial-adherence and 3) necessity-driven partial-adherence. Decisions about adherence considered potential for exposure to the virus, ability to reduce risk through use of protective measures, and perceived importance of/need for the behavior.This research highlights a need for a more nuanced understanding of adherence to lockdown measures. Provision of practical and financial support could reduce the number of people who have to engage in necessity-driven partial-adherence. Information about viral transmission could help people assess the risk associated with partial-adherence more accurately. More evidence is required on population level risks of people adopting risk-adapted partial-adherence.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol, in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) and by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) / Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) COVID-19 Rapid Response Call 2 (grant number MC_PC 19071). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care, or PHE. The funders had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or in writing the manuscript. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was provided by the NHS Health Research Authority London Queen Square Research Ethics Committee (20/HRA/2549). All interview participants verbally consented to take part in the study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.