TY - JOUR T1 - A Decision Analytics Model to Optimize Investment in Interventions Targeting the PrEP Cascade of Care JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.12.10.20247270 SP - 2020.12.10.20247270 AU - Samuel M. Jenness AU - Gregory Knowlton AU - Dawn K. Smith AU - Julia L. Marcus AU - Emeli J. Anderson AU - Aaron J. Siegler AU - Jeb Jones AU - Patrick S. Sullivan AU - Eva Enns Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/11/2020.12.10.20247270.abstract N2 - Background Gaps between recommended and actual levels of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use remain among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States. Interventions can address these gaps within a PrEP cascade framework. However, it is unknown how public health initiatives like the Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) plan should invest prevention funds into these interventions to maximize their population impact.Methods We used a stochastic network-based HIV transmission model for MSM in the Atlanta area paired with an economic budget optimization model. The model simulated MSM particpating in up to three real-world PrEP cascade interventions designed to improve initiation, adherence, or persistence. The primary outcome was infections averted over 10 years. The budget optimization model identified the investment combination under different budgets that maximized this outcome given intervention costs from a payer perspective.Results From the base 15% PrEP coverage level, the three interventions could increase coverage to 27%, resulting in 12.3% of infections averted over 10 years. Uptake of each intervention was interdependent: maximal use of the adherence and persistence interventions depended on new PrEP users generated by the initiation intervention. At lower budgets, investment entirely in the persistence intervention was optimal. As the budget increased, optimal investment strategy involved a mixture of the initiation and persistence interventions, but not the adherence intervention. However, if adherence intervention costs were halved, the optimal investment distribution was roughly equal across interventions at the highest budget level.Conclusions Investments into the PrEP cascade through initiatives like the EHE plan should account for the interactions of the interventions as they are collectively deployed. Optimal funding depends on measuring service capacity against user demand. Given current intervention efficacy estimates, the total population impact of each intervention may be improved with greater total budgets or reduced intervention costs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cooperative agreement number U38 PS004646 and National Institutes of Health grant R01 AI138783. Dr. Marcus is supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant K01 AI122853.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Emory University Institutional Review Board approved the study protocols for the primary empirical data collection yielding model parameters for the current study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe model code and parameters are all open and availability at the Github repository linked below. https://github.com/EpiModel/PrEP-Optimize ER -