TY - JOUR T1 - Failure of the New Kidney Allocation System in a Specific Ethnic Group JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.11.26.20239236 SP - 2020.11.26.20239236 AU - Texell Longoria-Dubocq AU - Yaritza Pizarro-Gonzalez AU - Isabel Mayorga-Perez AU - Mariel Javier-Gonzalez AU - Pedro Hernandez-Rivera Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/09/2020.11.26.20239236.abstract N2 - Introduction The Kidney Allocation System (KAS) implemented on December 4, 2014, was expected to improve kidney transplant list wait-time and allocate more kidney to high cPRA patients. This study aims to demonstrate outcomes after the implementation of the KAS in a Hispanic transplant center.Methods Retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database from a single-transplant center. Included all DDKT from July 2013 to June 2016. Compare and analyze DDKT selection and outcomes before and after KAS implementation.Results The overall number of kidney transplants performed during this period was 220. All of the patients were Hispanic. Included 50.5% Pre-KAS and 49.5% Post-KAS. Pre-KAS group had a significantly shorter waiting-time list than the post-KAS group, 900.05 vs 1126.75 respectively. EPTS less than 20% significantly improved in the Post-KAS group compared to the Pre-KAS group, 41.3% vs 20.9% respectively. No differences observed in KDPI, 1-year graft failure, or 1-year mortality rates.Conclusion This might be the first Hispanic only cohort evaluating the effects of KAS on a moderate volume kidney transplant center. The new system increased the wait-time list by approximately 25%, and it did not improve graft quality, graft failure, or mortality rates.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors have nothing to disclose.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was evaluated and approved by the institution's Institutional Review Board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRaw data were generated at Auxilio Mutuo Hospital. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author TLD on request. ER -