RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Early Assessment and Intervention for Families Experiencing Homelessness: A randomized trial comparing two parenting programs
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.07.20245563
DO 10.1101/2020.12.07.20245563
A1 Paulo A. Graziano
A1 Jamie A. Spiegel
A1 Emily Arcia
A1 Sundari Foundation
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/08/2020.12.07.20245563.abstract
AB Objective As part of a larger community-based, service driven research project, the purpose of this study was to 1) document the clinical needs of sheltered children (i.e., externalizing behavior problems [EBP], trauma symptoms, and developmental status) and 2) examine the effectiveness of time-limited adaptations of Parent Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) and Child Parent Psychotherapy (CPP).Method One hundred and forty-four young children (Mage = 3.48, SD = 1.09; 56.9% male; 78.5% Black/African American) and their mothers were recruited from a women’s homeless shelter and randomly assigned to a 12-week course of either PCIT or CPP delivered by shelter clinicians on site. Families completed pre and post intervention assessments including mother-reported measures of child EBP and trauma symptoms, and parenting stress. Observational data on maternal verbalizations during a child-led play session were also collected.Results High rates of clinically elevated EBP (36%), trauma symptoms (47%), and developmental delays (35%) were found. Time-limited PCIT resulted in greater reductions in maternal negative verbalizations and parenting stress, and greater increases in maternal positive verbalizations relative to time-limited CPP. As it relates to child outcomes, both time-limited PCIT and CPP resulted in similar decreases in children’s post-traumatic stress symptoms; however, only time-limited PCIT resulted in significant improvements in EBP.Conclusions Young sheltered children evidenced high levels of EBP, trauma symptoms and developmental delays. Both time-limited PCIT and CPP offered effective trauma interventions. However, PCIT offered a more comprehensive intervention by more effectively targeting EBP and parenting. Implications of these findings for clinical practice are discussed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT04459845Funding StatementAcknowledgements: This project was made possible by the generous funding of: The Childrens Trust of Miami Dade County, Florida; Miami Dade County Homeless Trust; Miami Dade County and Lotus Endowment Fund, Inc.; Micky and Madeleine Arison Family Foundation; Carnival Foundation; Martin Z. Margulies; Angela Whitman and Family Foundation; and our community.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approved by Florida International University's IRB board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available from the authors upon request.