PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Smith, Nicholas
AU  - Sievert, Lynnette Leidy
AU  - Muttukrishna, Shanthi
AU  - Begum, Khurshida
AU  - Murphy, Lorna
AU  - Sharmeen, Taniya
AU  - Gunu, Richard
AU  - Chowdhury, Osul
AU  - Bentley, Gillian R
TI  - Mismatch: A comparative study of vitamin D status in British-Bangladeshi migrants
AID  - 10.1101/2020.12.04.20244111
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.12.04.20244111
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/07/2020.12.04.20244111.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/07/2020.12.04.20244111.full
AB  - Background and objectives Low levels of vitamin D among dark-skinned migrants to northern latitudes and increased risks for associated pathologies illustrate an evolutionary mismatch between an environment of high ultraviolet (UV) radiation to which such migrants are adapted and the low-UV environment to which they migrate. Recently, low levels of vitamin D have also been associated with higher risks for contracting COVID-19. South Asians in the UK have higher risk for low vitamin D levels. In this study, we assessed vitamin D status of British-Bangladeshi migrants compared to white British residents and Bangladeshis still living in Bangladesh (‘sedentees’).Methodology The cross-sectional study compared vitamin D levels among 149 women aged 35-59, comprising British-Bangladeshi migrants (n=50), white UK neighbors (n=54) and Bangladeshi sedentees (n=45). Analyses comprised multivariate models to assess serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), and associations with anthropometric, lifestyle, health and migration factors.Results Vitamin D levels in Bangladeshi migrants were very low: mean 25(OH)D = 32.2nmol/L ± 13.0, with 29% of migrants classified as deficient (<25nmol/L) and 94% deficient or insufficient (≤50nmol/L). Mean levels of vitamin D were significantly lower among British-Bangladeshis compared to Bangladeshi sedentees (50.9nmol/L ± 13.3), presumably due to less exposure to sunlight following migration; levels were also lower than in white British women (55.3nmol/L ± 20.9). Lower levels of vitamin D were associated with increased body mass index and low iron status.Conclusions and implications Recommending supplements to Bangladeshi migrants could prevent potentially adverse health outcomes associated with vitamin D deficiency.Lay summary Vitamin D deficiency is one example of mismatch between an evolved trait and novel environments. Here we compare vitamin D status of dark-skinned British-Bangladeshi migrants in the UK to Bangladeshis in Bangladesh and white British individuals. Migrants had lower levels of vitamin D and are at risk for associated pathologies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for the initial data collection was provided by NSF grant #0548393 (LLS, GB, SM), a Commonwealth Scholarship (TS) and Fellowship Plan (CSFP, UK), Sigma Xi, and the Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University. None of the funders had any role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. The authors have no financial or personal conflicts of interest to declare.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of UMass Amherst, and the Ethics Committees at University College London, Durham University, and the M.A.G. Osmani Medical College, Sylhet, Bangladesh.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData held by University of Durham