TY - JOUR T1 - Impact of social distancing regulations and epidemic risk perception on social contact and SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential in rural South Africa: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.12.01.20241877 SP - 2020.12.01.20241877 AU - Nicky McCreesh AU - Vuyiswa Dlamini AU - Anita Edwards AU - Stephen Olivier AU - Njabulo Dayi AU - Keabetswe Dikgale AU - Siyabonga Nxumalo AU - Jaco Dreyer AU - Kathy Baisley AU - Mark J. Siedner AU - Richard G. White AU - Kobus Herbst AU - Alison D. Grant AU - Guy Harling Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/03/2020.12.01.20241877.abstract N2 - Background South Africa implemented rapid and strict physical distancing regulations to minimize SARS-CoV-2 epidemic spread. Evidence on the impact of such measures on interpersonal contact in rural and lower-income settings is limited.Methods We compared population-representative social contact surveys conducted in the same rural KwaZulu-Natal location once in 2019 and twice in mid-2020. Respondents reported characteristics of physical and conversational (‘close interaction’) contacts over 24 hours. We built age-mixing matrices and estimated the proportional change in the SARS-CoV-2 reproduction number (R0). Respondents also reported counts of others present at locations visited and transport used, from which we evaluated change in potential exposure to airborne infection due to shared indoor space (‘shared air’).Results Respondents in March-December 2019 (n=1704) reported a mean of 7.4 close interaction contacts and 196 shared air person-hours beyond their homes. Respondents in June-July 2020 (n=216), as the epidemic peaked locally, reported 4.1 close interaction contacts and 21 shared air person-hours outside their home, with significant declines in others’ homes and public spaces. Adults aged over 50 had fewer close contacts with others over 50, but little change in contact with 15-29 year olds, reflecting ongoing contact within multigenerational households. We estimate potential R0 fell by 42% (95% plausible range 14-59%) between 2019 and June-July 2020.Discussion Extra-household social contact fell substantially following imposition of Covid-19 distancing regulations in rural South Africa. Ongoing contact within intergenerational households highlighted the limitation of social distancing measures in protecting older adults.Funding Wellcome Trust, UKRI, DFID, European UnionCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementData collection in the Umoya omuhle programme is funded in part by the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ES/P008011/1), one of seven research councils underpinning the Antimicrobial Resistance Cross Council Initiative. It is also supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement that is also part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union (MR/P002404/1). The Covid Social Contacts study was funded by internal seed funding from the Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), which is core funded by the Wellcome Trust (201433/Z/16/Z). GH is supported by a fellowship from the Royal Society and the Wellcome Trust (210479/Z/18/Z). NM, RGW and ADG are supported by the UK ESRC (ES/P008011/1); NM and RGW are supported by the Wellcome Trust (218261/Z/19/Z). RGW is additionally funded NIH (R01-AI147321), EDTCP (RIA208D-2505B), UK MRC (CCF17-7779 via SET Bloomsbury), BMGF (OPP1084276, OPP1135288 & INV-001754), and the WHO (2020/985800-0).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for 2019 data collection was granted by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) (BE662/17) and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (14640); ethical approval for 2020 data collection was granted by UKZN BREC (BE290/16) and University College London REC (15231/013). Informed consent for participation was recorded in writing in 2019 and telephonically in 2020.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesIndividual respondent data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification, will be made available immediately following publication indefinitely at https://data.ahri.org/ for anyone providing a methodologically sound proposal to conduct analysis. ER -