RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Behavioral Inhibition and Dual Mechanisms of Anxiety Risk: Disentangling Neural Correlates of Proactive and Reactive Control JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.12.01.20242123 DO 10.1101/2020.12.01.20242123 A1 Emilio A. Valadez A1 Sonya V. Troller-Renfree A1 George A. Buzzell A1 Heather A. Henderson A1 Andrea Chronis-Tuscano A1 Daniel S. Pine A1 Nathan A. Fox YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/02/2020.12.01.20242123.abstract AB Background Behavioral inhibition (BI) is a temperament style characterized by heightened reactivity and negative affect in response to novel people and situations, and it is a strong predictor of anxiety problems later in life. However, not all BI children develop anxiety problems and mounting evidence suggests that how one manages their cognitive resources (cognitive control) influences anxiety risk. The present study tests whether more (proactive control) or less (reactive control) planful cognitive strategies moderate relations between BI and anxiety.Methods Participants included 144 adolescents (55.9% female) whose temperament was assessed during toddlerhood. In adolescence (Mage = 15.4 years), participants completed an AX Continuous Performance Test while EEG was recorded in order to disentangle neural activity related to proactive (cue-locked P3b) and reactive (probe-locked N2) control.Results BI was associated with greater total anxiety scores only among adolescents with smaller ΔP3bs and larger ΔN2s – a pattern consistent with decreased reliance on proactive strategies and increased reliance on reactive strategies. Additionally, a larger ΔP3b was associated with greater total anxiety scores.Conclusions BI relates to risk for anxiety specifically among adolescents who rely less on proactive strategies and more on reactive control strategies. Results further suggest that proactive control differentiates a BI-related etiological pathway to anxiety from a more general pathway to anxiety occurring regardless of BI level. Thus, developmental context (i.e., temperament) moderates the association between anxiety and proactive control. The present study is the first to characterize how proactive and reactive control uniquely relate to pathways toward anxiety risk.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health, Grand/Award Number: U01MH093349 (to N. A. F.).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Maryland College Park IRBAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study may be made available from the corresponding author, E. A. V., upon reasonable request.