PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Phoebe Barnett AU - Lucy Goulding AU - Cecilia Casetta AU - Harriet Jordan AU - Luke Sheridan-Rains AU - Thomas Steare AU - Julie Williams AU - Lisa Wood AU - Fiona Gaughran AU - Sonia Johnson TI - Remote working in mental health services: a rapid umbrella review of pre-COVID-19 literature AID - 10.1101/2020.11.30.20240721 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.11.30.20240721 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.30.20240721.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.30.20240721.full AB - Background Tele-mental health care has been rapidly adopted to maintain services during the pandemic, and there is now substantial interest in its future role. Service planning and policy making for recovery from the pandemic and beyond should draw not only on COVID-19 experiences, but also on the substantial research evidence accumulated prior to this.Aims to conduct an umbrella review of systematic reviews of research literature and evidence-based guidance on remote working in mental health, including both qualitative and quantitative literature.Method Three databases were searched between January 2010 and August 2020 for systematic reviews meeting pre-defined criteria. Reviews retrieved were independently screened and those meeting inclusion criteria were synthesised and assessed for risk of bias. Narrative synthesis was used to report findingsResults Nineteen systematic reviews met inclusion criteria. Fifteen examined clinical effectiveness, eight reported on aspects of tele-mental health implementation, ten reported on acceptability to service users and clinicians, two on cost-effectiveness and one on guidance. Most reviews were assessed as low quality. Findings suggested that video-based communication could be as effective and acceptable as face-face formats, at least in the short-term. Evidence was lacking on extent of digital exclusion and how it can be overcome, or on significant context such as children and young people and inpatient settings.Conclusions This umbrella review suggests that tele-mental health has potential to be an effective and acceptable form of service delivery. However, we found limited evidence on impacts of large-scale implementation across catchment areas. Combining previous evidence and COVID-19 experiences may allow realistic planning for future tele-mental health implementation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis paper presents independent research commissioned and funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Program, conducted by the NIHR Policy Research Unit (PRU) in Mental health. This paper is also supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the department of Health and Social Care or its arms length bodies, or other government departments. In addition, LG is funded by King's Improvement Science, which is part of the NIHR ARC South London and comprises a specialist team of improvement scientists and secior researchers based at King's College London. King's Improvement Science is funded by Kings Health Partners (Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation trust, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation trust, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust), Guy's and St Thomas' Charity, and the Maudsley Charity. JW is funded by the Maudsley Charity. FG is in part supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, The Maudlsey Charity amd NIHR ARC South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not applicableAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData extraction is available from the author on request.