@article {Murray2020.11.25.20238741, author = {Maureen H. Murray and Kaylee A. Byers and Jacqueline Buckley and Seth B. Magle and Dorothy Maffei and Preeya Waite and Danielle German}, title = {{\textquotedblleft}I don{\textquoteright}t feel safe sitting in my own yard{\textquotedblright}: Chicago resident experiences with urban rats during a COVID-19 stay-at-home order}, elocation-id = {2020.11.25.20238741}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1101/2020.11.25.20238741}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Background Encounters with rats in urban areas increase risk of human exposure to rat-associated zoonotic pathogens and act as a stressor associated with psychological distress. The frequency and nature of human-rat encounters may be altered by social distancing policies to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, restaurant closures may reduce food availability for rats and promote rat activity in nearby residential areas, thus increasing public health risks during a period of public health crisis. In this study, we aimed to identify factors associated with increased perceived exposure to rats during a stay-at-home order, describe residents{\textquoteright} encounters with rats relevant to their health and well-being, and identify factors associated with increased use of rodent control.Methods Urban residents in Chicago, a large city with growing concerns about rats and health disparities, completed an online questionnaire including fixed response and open-ended questions during the spring 2020 stay-at-home order. Analyses included ordinal multivariate regression, spatial analysis, and thematic analysis for open-ended responses.Results Overall, 21\% of respondents (n=835) reported an increase in rat sightings around their homes during the stay-at-home order and increased rat sightings was positively associated with proximity to restaurants, low-rise apartment buildings, and rat feces in the home (p<=0.01). Many respondents described feeling unsafe using their patio or yard, and afraid of rats entering their home or spreading disease. Greater engagement with rodent control was associated with property ownership, information about rat control, and lower incomes (p<=0.01).Conclusions More frequent rat encounters may be an unanticipated public health concern during periods of social distancing, especially in restaurant-dense areas or in low-rise apartment buildings. Rat presence may also limit residents{\textquoteright} ability to enjoy nearby outdoor spaces, which otherwise might buffer stress experienced during a stay-at-home order. Proactive rat control may be needed to mitigate rat-associated health risks during future stay-at-home orders.Competing Interest StatementAll authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: MHM, SBM, JB, and DG had financial support from the National Science Foundation for the submitted work; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.Funding StatementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1923882. The funding body played no role in the design of the study or the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Lincoln Park Zoo Institutional Review Board approved our informed consent protocol but deemed this study exempt from the requirements of 45 CFR 46.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesA summarized version of the datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.25.20238741}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.25.20238741.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }