PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Niklas Bobrovitz AU - Rahul Krishan Arora AU - Christian Cao AU - Emily Boucher AU - Michael Liu AU - Hannah Rahim AU - Claire Donnici AU - Natasha Ilincic AU - Nathan Duarte AU - Jordan Van Wyk AU - Tingting Yan AU - Lucas Penny AU - Mitchell Segal AU - Judy Chen AU - Mairead Whelan AU - Austin Atmaja AU - Simona Rocco AU - Abel Joseph AU - David A. Clifton AU - Tyler Williamson AU - Cedric P Yansouni AU - Timothy Grant Evans AU - Jonathan Chevrier AU - Jesse Papenburg AU - Matthew P. Cheng TI - Global seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis AID - 10.1101/2020.11.17.20233460 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.11.17.20233460 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/18/2020.11.17.20233460.1.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/18/2020.11.17.20233460.1.full AB - Background Studies reporting estimates of the seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies have rapidly emerged. We aimed to synthesize seroprevalence data to better estimate the burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection, identify high-risk groups, and inform public health decision making.Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched publication databases, preprint servers, and grey literature sources for seroepidemiological study reports, from January 1, 2020 to August 28, 2020. We included studies that reported a sample size, study date, location, and seroprevalence estimate. Estimates were corrected for imperfect test accuracy with Bayesian measurement error models. We conducted meta-analysis to identify demographic differences in the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and meta-regression to identify study-level factors associated with seroprevalence. We compared region-specific seroprevalence data to confirmed cumulative incidence. PROSPERO: CRD42020183634.Findings We identified 338 seroprevalence studies including 2.3 million participants in 50 countries. Seroprevalence was low in the general population (median 3.2%, IQR 1.0-6.4%) and slightly higher in at-risk populations (median 5.4%, IQR 1.5-18.4%). Median seroprevalence varied by WHO Global Burden of Disease region (p < 0.01), from 1.0% in Southeast Asia, East Asia and Oceania to 18.8% in South Asia. National studies had lower seroprevalence estimates than local (p = 0.02) studies. Compared to White persons, Black persons (prevalence ratio [RR] 2.34, 95% CI 1.60-3.43) and Asian persons (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.22-2.01) were more likely to be seropositive. Seroprevalence was higher among people ages 18-64 compared to 65 and over (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.52). Health care workers had a 1.74x (95% CI: 1.18-2.58) higher risk compared to the general population. There was no difference in seroprevalence between sexes. There were 123 studies (36%) at low or moderate risk of bias. Seroprevalence estimates from national studies were median 11.9 (IQR 8.0 - 16.6) times higher than the corresponding SARS-CoV-2 cumulative incidence.Interpretation Most of the population remains susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Public health measures must be improved to protect disproportionately affected groups, including non-White people and adults. Measures taken in SE Asia, E Asia and Oceania, and Latin America and Caribbean may have been more effective in controlling virus transmission than measures taken in other regions.Funding Public Health Agency of Canada through the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force.Competing Interest StatementDAC reports personal fees from Oxford University Innovation, Biobeats, and Sensyne Health. MPC reports grants from McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity and grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research during the conduct of the study; personal fees from GEn1E Lifesciences (as a member of the scientific advisory board) and personal fees from nplex biosciences (as a member of the scientific advisory board), both outside the submitted work. JP reports grants and personal fees from BD Diagnostics, Seegene, Janssen Pharmaceutical and AbbVie, grants from MedImmune and Sanofi Pasteur, outside the submitted work.Funding StatementThis research was funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada through the Canadian COVID-19 Immunity Task Force. Our funding source had no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. We have not been paid to write this article by a pharmaceutical company or other agency. The corresponding author (NB) confirms that all authors had full access to the full data in the study and accepts responsibility to submit for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This review was preregistered with the protocol available in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020183634)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesN/A https://serotracker.com/