TY - JOUR T1 - Subjective mental health and need for care among psychiatric outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an outreach initiative in Sweden JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.11.10.20229039 SP - 2020.11.10.20229039 AU - Oskar Flygare AU - Volen Z. Ivanov AU - Roland Säll AU - Henrik Malaise AU - Christian Rück AU - Nitya Jayaram-Lindström AU - Lina Martinsson Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/13/2020.11.10.20229039.abstract N2 - Importance The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic restricts access to care for psychiatric patients. The physical and mental well-being of patients with severe mental illness in the current circumstances is unknown.Objective To evaluate physical and mental well-being, subjective mental health, and need for updated psychiatric management plans in a sample of patients with severe mental illness during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.Design Cross-sectional study of structured telephone assessments conducted between April 23 and June 30, 2020.Setting Regional psychiatric outpatient care centre in Stockholm, Sweden.Participants Patients who had not been in contact with their psychiatric clinic between April 9 and April 23, 2020. A total of 1071 patients were contacted by phone.Exposures Occurrence of respiratory symptoms, changes in psychiatric symptoms, and the need for updated psychiatric management plans, as determined by the telephone assessors. Subjective mental health rated 0-100 by patients.Main Outcomes and Measures Self-rated physical, respiratory and psychiatric symptoms according to a semi-structured interview. Subjective mental health rated on a scale from 0-100.Results Patients (n = 1071) were on average 45 years old (SD = 16.9), of which 570 (53%) were female. Neurodevelopmental disorders, psychotic disorders, and bipolar disorder were the most common diagnostic categories. The majority of respondents reported no respiratory symptoms (86%), and few reported light (10%) or severe (4%) respiratory symptoms. Similarly, most patients reported no worsening in psychiatric symptoms (81%). For those who reported a worsening of psychiatric symptoms (19%), the psychiatric management plans that were already in place were deemed appropriate in most cases (16.5%), whereas 22 patients (2.5%) reported a worsening of psychiatric symptoms that warranted an earlier or immediate follow-up by their psychiatric clinic. Patients rated their subjective mental health on a 0-100 scale as 70.5 [95% CI 69 - 71.9] on average (n = 841). Response rates to the questions of the structured assessment varied from 79% - 82%.Conclusions and Relevance The majority of patients reported no respiratory symptoms, no change in psychiatric symptoms and a rather high subjective well-being. Patients in psychiatric care with a mental health care plan experienced stability in the management of their psychiatric symptoms and general well-being, and only a minority were in need of acute support during the early pandemic phase in Stockholm, Sweden.Question What is the physical and mental health of patients with severe mental illness during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic?Findings In this cross-sectional study that included 1071 patients at a psychiatric outpatient clinic, the proportion of patients reporting respiratory symptoms were 4%. In addition, 19% of patients reported a worsening of psychiatric symptoms, with 2.5% needing an earlier follow-up than was planned.Meaning Patients with severe mental illness experienced stability in the management of their psychiatric symptoms during the early pandemic phase in Sweden.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Mr. Flygare is supported by Karolinska Institutet and Thuringstiftelsen (no. 2018-00390).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical Review Agency in Sweden (no. 2020-03474).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRequests for additional information should be made to the first or last author. Due to Swedish and European Union data protection and privacy legislation, we generally do not share patient-level data. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NP7MU ER -