RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Parental perceptions of COVID-19-like illness in their children
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.11.05.20226480
DO 10.1101/2020.11.05.20226480
A1 Ava Hodson
A1 Lisa Woodland
A1 Louise E Smith
A1 G James Rubin
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/06/2020.11.05.20226480.abstract
AB Objectives To explore parents’ perceptions of COVID-19-like symptoms in their child and attitudes towards isolating from others in the household when unwell.Study Design Qualitative, semi-structured interviews.Methods 30 semi-structured telephone interviews with parents of children between 4 and 18 years.Results We found four themes relating to symptom attribution (‘normalising symptoms’, ‘err on the side of caution’, ‘experience of temperature’, ‘symptoms not normal for us’). In general, parents were more likely to attribute symptoms to COVID-19 if a temperature was present or the symptoms were perceived as ‘unusual’ for their family. Four themes relating to self-isolation (‘difficult to prevent contact with children’, ‘isolation would be no different to lockdown life’, ‘ability to get food and supplies’, ‘limited space’). Parents believed they would find isolation within the household difficult or impossible if they had dependent children, had limited space or could not shop for groceries.Conclusions The findings highlight complexities in symptom perception, attribution, and household isolation. We suggest that they can be overcome by a) providing better guidance on what symptoms require action, b) providing guidance as to how to prevent infection within the household, and c) by supporting families with grocery shopping through a potential second or third wave.Competing Interest StatementGJR and LES are participant in meetings of UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies and its subgroups.Funding StatementThe sponsor and funder of the study had no role in study design, analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All participants received information sheets. Informed consent was provided electronically, prior to the interviews. The research was approved by the Psychiatry, Nursing and Midwifery Research Ethics Subcommittee at Kings College London (ref MRSP-19/20-18349).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data referred to in the manuscript can be made available if necessary.