TY - JOUR T1 - The mental health of staff working in intensive care during COVID-19 JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.11.03.20208322 SP - 2020.11.03.20208322 AU - Neil Greenberg AU - Dale Weston AU - Charlotte Hall AU - Tristan Caulfield AU - Victoria Williamson AU - Kevin Fong Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/05/2020.11.03.20208322.abstract N2 - Background Intensive Care Unit (ICU), anaesthetic and theatres staff have faced significant challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic which have the potential to adversely affect their mental healthAims To identify the rates of probable mental health disorder in ICU and anaesthetic staff in six English hospitals during June and July 2020Methods An anonymised brief web-based survey comprising standardised questionnaires examining depression, anxiety symptoms, symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), wellbeing and alcohol use was administered to staff.Results 709 participants completed the surveys comprising 291 (41%) doctors, 344 (48.5%) nurses, and 74 (10.4%) other healthcare staff. Over half (58.8%) reported good wellbeing, however 45.4% met the threshold for probable clinical significance on at least one of the following measures: severe depression (6.3%), PTSD (39.5%), severe anxiety (11.3%) or problem drinking (7.2%). 13.4% of respondents reported frequent thoughts of being better off dead, or of hurting themselves in the past two weeks. We found that doctors consistently reported better mental health than nurses.Conclusions We found substantial rates of probable mental health disorders, and thoughts of self-harm, amongst ICU staff; these difficulties were especially prevalent in nurses. These results indicate the need for a national strategy to protect the mental health, and decrease the risk of functional impairment, of ICU staff whilst they carry out their essential work during COVID-19.What is already known about this subjectIntensive care unit (ICU) staff are regularly exposed to traumatic situations as part of their jobPrevious studies have shown them to be at risk of psychological and moral distressLittle is known about the mental health of ICU staff during the current pandemicWhat this study addsAlmost half of ICU staff report symptoms consistent with a probable diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder, severe depression or anxiety or problem drinkingAround 1 in 7 ICU staff report recent thoughts of self-harm or of wanting to be better off deadNursing staff are more likely to report higher levels of distress than doctors or other clinical staffWhat impact this may have on practice or policyHealthcare managers need to prioritise staff mental health support and timely access to evidence based treatments for ICU staffSupervisors and managers should be aware that a substantial proportion of ICU staff may perform less well because of their current poor state of mental healthMore work is needed to understand whether the high levels of mental health symptoms identified in this study are truly indicative of high levels of clinical need for mental healthcareCompeting Interest StatementKF works for NHS England. NG runs a consultancy which provides the NHS with active listening and peer support training.Funding StatementThe research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at Kings College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE), in collaboration with the University of East Anglia and Newcastle University. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or Public Health England.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The need for ethical review was discussed with two university ethics committees, King's College London (KCL) and University College London (UCL). Both ethics boards confirmed that this project does not require ethical approval as it is a service evaluation since the participants used are not randomised, the protocol does not demand any change in the care being provided or any particular intervention, and the findings will not be generalisable outside of the groups of staff that are the focus of the survey. This is as per the definition provided by the NHS Health Research Authority "Is my study research?" decision tool which also confirmed that the study did not require review by a research ethics committee.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is not available for sharing. ER -