PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Petry-Schmelzer, Jan Niklas AU - Dembek, Till A. AU - Steffen, Julia K. AU - Jergas, Hannah AU - Dafsari, Haidar S. AU - Fink, Gereon R. AU - Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle AU - Barbe, Michael T. TI - Selecting the most effective DBS contact in essential tremor patients based on individual tractography AID - 10.1101/2020.11.03.20211847 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.11.03.20211847 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/04/2020.11.03.20211847.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/04/2020.11.03.20211847.full AB - Postoperative choice of the most effective DBS contact in patients with essential tremor (ET) so far relies on lengthy clinical testing. It has been shown that the postoperative effectiveness of DBS contacts depends on the distance to the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRTT). Here, we investigated whether the most effective DBS contact could be determined from the stimulation overlap with the individual DRTT. Seven ET patients with bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation were included retrospectively. Tremor control was assessed contact-wise during test stimulation with 2mA. The individual DRTTs were identified from diffusion tensor imaging. Contacts were ranked by their overlap of the test stimulation with the respective DRTT in relation to their clinical effectiveness. A linear mixed-effects model was calculated to determine the influence of the DRTT-overlap on tremor control. In 92.9 % of the cases, the contact with the best clinical effect was the contact with the highest or second-highest DRTT-overlap. On the group level, the DRTT-overlap explained 26.7% of the variance of the clinical outcome (p<0.001). To conclude, data suggest that the overlap with the DRTT based on individual tractography may serve as a marker to determine the most effective DBS contact in ET patients and reduce burdensome clinical testing in the future.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNo Trial ID as it is a pure retrospective study.Funding StatementSupported by the Cologne Clinician Scientist Program (CCSP) / Faculty of Medicine / University of Cologne. Funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, FI 773/15-1).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical commitee Cologne (Vote: 20-1511).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be available upon acceptance of the manuscript via the openscience framework.