TY - JOUR T1 - COVID-19 Medical Vulnerability Indicators: A Local Data Model for Equity in Public Health Decision-Making JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.11.02.20215657 SP - 2020.11.02.20215657 AU - Paul M. Ong AU - Chhandara Pech AU - Nataly Rios Gutierrez AU - Vickie Mays Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/04/2020.11.02.20215657.abstract N2 - Objective To develop indicators of vulnerability for coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) infection in Los Angeles County (LAC) by race and neighborhood characteristics.Design Development of indicators that combines pre-existing medical vulnerabilities with social and built-environment data by zip code tabulation areas (ZCTAs).Setting Neighborhoods in LAC categorized by race/ethnicity ranked into quintiles by relative vulnerability: Non-Hispanic white; Black; Latinx; Cambodians, Hmong and Laotians combined (CHL); and Other Asians.Data Sources AskCHIS Neighborhood Edition, American Community Survey 2014-2018, and California Department of Parks and Recreation.Main Outcome Measures 1) Pre-Existing Health Condition, 2) Barriers to Accessing Healthcare, 3) Built Environment Risk, and 4) CDC’s Social Vulnerability.Results Neighborhoods most vulnerable to COVID-19 are characterized by significant clustering of racial minorities, low income households and unmet medical needs. An overwhelming 73% of Blacks reside in the neighborhoods with the two highest quintiles of pre-existing health conditions, followed by Latinx (70%) and CHL (60%), while 60% of whites reside in low or the lowest vulnerable neighborhoods. For the Barriers to Accessing Healthcare indicator, 40% of Latinx reside in the highest vulnerability places followed by Blacks, CHL and other Asians (29%, 22%, and 16% respectively), compared with only 7% of Whites reside in such neighborhoods. The Built Environment Indicator finds CHL (63%) followed by Latinx (55%) and Blacks (53%) reside in the neighborhoods designated as high or the highest vulnerability compared to 32% of Whites residing in these neighborhoods. The Social Vulnerability Indicator finds 42% of Blacks and Latinx and 38% of CHL residing in neighborhoods of high vulnerability compared with only 8% of Whites residing these neighborhoods.Conclusions Vulnerability to covid-19 infections differs by neighborhood and racial/ethnic groups. Our vulnerability indicators when utilized in decision-making of re-openings or resource distribution such as testing, vaccine distribution, hotel rooms for quarantine and other covid-19-related resources can provide an equity driven data approach for the most vulnerable.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe thank the UCLA's BRITE Center on Science, Research & Policy (www.minoritydisparities.org) (MD006923) for providing partial support for this research and analyses. This project builds on the UCLA Center for Neighborhood Knowledge's (CNK) COVID-19 Equity Research Initiative, which includes studies examining how the negative economic impacts of COVID-19 are distributed across neighborhoods. We are grateful to the UCLA Latino Policy and Politics Initiative, UCLA Luskin Institute on Inequality and Democracy, UCLA Asian American Studies Center, UCLA American Indian Studies Center, UCLA Ziman Center for Real Estate and the California Office of the President (CBCRP Grant #R00RG2606) for their partnership and collaboration with the Initiative. These organizations supported previous work which serves as a partial foundation for the analytical work in this report. The authors alone are responsible for the content of this report.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The UCLA IRB determines that this research is exemptAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData used in this manuscript are available through the author. ER -