RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 High attack rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection through household-transmission: a prospective study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.11.02.20224485
DO 10.1101/2020.11.02.20224485
A1 Kanika Kuwelker
A1 Fan Zhou
A1 Bjørn Blomberg
A1 Sarah Lartey
A1 Karl Albert Brokstad
A1 Mai Chi Trieu
A1 Anders Madsen
A1 Florian Krammer
A1 Kristin GI Mohn
A1 Camilla Tøndel
A1 Dagrunn Waag Linchausen
A1 Rebecca J. Cox
A1 Nina Langeland
A1 on behalf of the Bergen COVID-19 research group
A1 Amit Bansal
A1 Annette Corydon
A1 Francisco Real
A1 Geir Bredholt
A1 Hauke Bartsch
A1 Helene Heitmann Sandnes
A1 Juha Vahokoski
A1 Kjerstin Jacobsen
A1 Marianne Eidsheim
A1 Marianne Sævik
A1 Nina Urke Ertesvåg
A1 Synnøve Ygre Hauge
A1 Therese Bredholt Onyango
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/04/2020.11.02.20224485.abstract
AB Background Household attack rates of SARS-CoV-2 ranging from 7% to 38% have been reported, using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of respiratory samples. Lower attack rates were described in children, but the importance of age in household transmission dynamics remains to be clarified.Methods During the first month of the outbreak, we enrolled 112 households (291 participants) in a prospective case-ascertained study, collecting demographic and clinical data from index cases and household members. Sera were collected 6-8 weeks after index case symptom onset, to measure SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies.Findings T Local Ethics Committee (#118664). he overall household attack rate was 45% assessed by seroconversion, and 47% when also including RT-PCR positives. Serology identified a significantly higher number of infected household members than RT-PCR. Attack rates were equally high in children (43%) and young adults (46%), but highest among household members aged ≥60 years (72%). The attack rate was 16% in asymptomatic household members, and 42% in RT-PCR negative household members. Older adults generally had higher antibody titres than younger adults. The risk of household transmission was higher when the index case had fever or dyspnoea during acute illness but not associated with cough.Interpretation Serological assays provide more accurate estimates of household secondary attack rate than RT-PCR, especially among children who have a lower RT-PCR positivity rate. Children are equally susceptible to infection as adults, but elderly show higher attack rates. Negative RT-PCR or lack of symptoms are not sufficient to rule out infection in household members.Funding Helse Vest (F-11628), Trond Mohn Foundation (TMS2020TMT05).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementHelse Vest (F-11628), Trond Mohn Foundation (TMS2020TMT05).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Western Norway Local Ethics Committee (#118664).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request