TY - JOUR T1 - Long-term individual and population functional outcomes in older adults with atrial fibrillation JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.05.04.20091025 SP - 2020.05.04.20091025 AU - Anna L. Parks AU - Sun Y. Jeon AU - W. John Boscardin AU - Michael A. Steinman AU - Alexander K. Smith AU - Margaret C. Fang AU - Sachin J. Shah Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/03/2020.05.04.20091025.abstract N2 - Background Older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) have multiple risk factors for disablement. Long-term function and the contribution of strokes to disability has not been previously characterized.Methods We performed a longitudinal, observational study in the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (1992-2014). We included participants ≥65 years with Medicare claims who met incident AF diagnosis claims criteria. We examined the association of incident stroke with three functional outcomes: independence with activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and community-dwelling. We fit separate logistic regression models with repeated measures adjusting for comorbidities and demographics to estimate the effect of stroke on function. We estimate the contribution of strokes to the overall population burden of functional impairment using the method of recycled predictions.Results Among 3530 participants (median age 79 years, 53% women, median CHA2DS2-VASc 5), 262 had a stroke over 17,396 person-years. Independent of stroke and accounting for population comorbidities, annually, ADL dependence increased by 4.4%, IADL dependence increased by 3.9%, and nursing home residence increased by 1.2% (p<0.05 for all). Accounting for comorbidities, of those who experienced a stroke, 31.9% developed new ADL dependence, 26.5% developed new IADL dependence, and 8.6% newly moved to a nursing home (p<0.05 for all). Considering all causes of function loss, 1.7% of ADL disability-years, 1.2% of IADL disability-years, and 7.3% of nursing home years could be attributed to stroke over 7.4years.Conclusion Older adults lose substantial function over time following AF diagnosis, independent of stroke. Stroke was associated with a significant decline in function and an increase in the likelihood of nursing home move, but stroke did not accelerate subsequent disability accrual. Because of the high background rate of functional loss, stroke was not the dominant determinant of population-level disability in older adults with AF.Impact statement We certify that this work is novel. Little is known about long-term function (ADL, IADL, community-dwelling) among older adults with AF and the association with stroke. This nationally representative study finds a high rate of function loss independent of stroke, and among those who suffer a stroke, a dramatic and immediate decline in function. Because of the high rate of function loss independent of stroke and the relatively low rate of stroke, on a population level, stroke is not the dominant determinant of disability in older adults with AF.Competing Interest StatementMCF reports grants from NIH/NHLBI, during the conduct of the study. SEG and KEC report grants from NIH/NIA, during the conduct of the study. SJS reports grants from NIH/NCATS, during the conduct of the study. No financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.Funding StatementThis study was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR001870), the National Institute on Aging (P30AG044281 and P30AG015272), and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (K24HL141354). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval: The Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board at the University of California, San Francisco, approved this study (IRB# 16-19185).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData sharing: Researchers can apply to use the Health and Retirement Study (hrs.isr.umich.edu/) for access to the data use in this study. Code used to generate the cohort and perform the analyses can be found on Dryad. ER -