RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Behavioral profiles associated with adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer: a retrospective population-based cohort study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2026.05.25.26353903
DO 10.64898/2026.05.25.26353903
A1 Dibner-Dunlap, Aaron
A1 Sutermaster, Staci
A1 Smittenaar, Peter
A1 Sgaier, Sema
YR 2026
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2026/06/08/2026.05.25.26353903.abstract
AB Purpose Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) substantially reduces recurrence and mortality in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer but requires sustained daily adherence over 5 to 10 years. Approximately one-third of patients fall short of recommended adherence in the first year alone, largely due to distinct combinations of attitudes, barriers, and circumstances. Existing studies have catalogued individual risk factors but lack the scale and breadth to characterize how these factors co-occur within patients, or to distinguish behavioral drivers from confounding by clinical and demographic context. We sought to characterize the behavioral and social heterogeneity underlying AET adherence in a national real-world cohort. Moving beyond population-average risk factors, we identify the distinct patient profiles, and the differing drivers within them, that any effective adherence strategy must address.Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2016 and 2025, linking two large-scale, individual-level datasets through privacy-preserving tokenization: Surgo Health’s BehavioralPulse™, which provides modeled individual-level behavioral and attitudinal risk scores together with consumer sociodemographic attributes, and longitudinal medical and pharmacy claims from a claims data provider. Eligible patients underwent 1 to 2 breast surgeries, initiated oral AET (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors), and maintained continuous insurance coverage for 365 days following therapy initiation. The primary outcome was adherence, defined as medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80% in the first year. Mixed-effects logistic regression with a random intercept for ZIP3 estimated adjusted associations across behavioral, sociodemographic, and clinical predictors. To characterize how behavioral factors co-occur within patients, we identified the most prevalent configurations of the statistically significant behavioral predictors and estimated their relative association with adherence, holding clinical and demographic factors constant.Results The final cohort included 401,450 women, of whom 280,595 (69.9%) achieved MPR ≥80%. Several behavioral factors were independently associated with adherence after adjustment for clinical and demographic covariates, including comfort following medication instructions (aOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.24), geographic proximity to breast oncologists (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.32), tangible instrumental social support (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.13), religiosity (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), concern about sexual side effects (aOR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99), and cost-related access barriers (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00). The 10 most common configurations of significant behavioral predictors accounted for over 70% of the cohort, with the two most prevalent representing more than 40% of patients. The most common profile, defined by an absence of behavioral barriers and the presence of social support, was associated with a positive behavioral contribution to adherence propensity (behavioral linear predictor OR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04-1.36) comparable in magnitude to several established clinical predictors. Compared against this referent profile, six of the nine remaining profiles had lower adherence, with relative odds ranging from approximately 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95) to 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99). One profile, similar to the reference but including high trust in doctors, was associated with higher adherence odds (1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07). These profiles arose from substantively different underlying combinations of factors: segments dominated by cost barriers, by side-effect concerns, or by limited social support produced comparable overall adherence risk but through distinct pathways.Conclusion In this national cohort, nearly one-third of women did not achieve recommended first-year adherence to AET. The pathways to non-adherence were heterogeneous, structured into recurring behavioral profiles rather than randomly distributed across patients. This heterogeneity is clinically meaningful: patients with similar adherence risk may benefit from substantially different forms of support, ranging from financial navigation to side-effect management to social support resources. Surfacing this structure required linking individual-level behavioral data to large-scale claims data, offering a practical foundation for optimal design of patient-centered adherence interventions that are tailored to the specific configurations of barriers patients actually face.Competing Interest StatementAuthors are employees of Surgo Health, a public benefit corporation that holds the rights to BehavioralPulse.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of Salus IRB gave ethical approval of the human subjects survey portion of this work via protocol no. 0100. The final dataset used deidentified data licensed from a third party, Komodo, in compliance with 45 CFR 164.514(a)-(c). The data had identifying patient information removed and were coded in such a way that they could not be linked back to subjects from whom they were originally collected prior to the authors gaining access. This research did not require institutional review board or ethics review, as analyses of these data do not meet the definition of "research involving human subjects" as defined within 45 CFR 46.102(f), which stipulates human subjects as living individuals about whom an investigator obtains identifiable private information for research purposes.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the proprietary nature of the underlying datasets, as well as the sensitive nature and reidentification risk in the underlying data. BehavioralPulse can be licensed from Surgo Health. Researchers interested in obtaining a license to the Komodo Healthcare Map can inquire at https://www.komodohealth.com.