RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A distributed learning strategy improves performance and retention of skills in neonatal resuscitation: A simulation-based randomized controlled trial
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.28.20221473
DO 10.1101/2020.10.28.20221473
A1 Pratheeban Nambyiah
A1 Sylvain Boet
A1 Gregory Moore
A1 Riley Boyle
A1 Deborah Aylward
A1 Andre Jakubow
A1 Sandy Lam
A1 Karim Abdulla
A1 M. Dylan Bould
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/30/2020.10.28.20221473.abstract
AB Skill retention after neonatal resuscitation training is poor. A distributed learning strategy – where learning is spread over multiple sessions – can improve retention of declarative memory (facts & knowledge). Session timings are critical – maximal retention occurs when a refresher session is scheduled at 10-30% of the time between initial training and test. We hypothesized this also holds true for neonatal resuscitation, a complex skill set requiring both declarative and procedural memory. We conducted a prospective, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial. University of Ottawa residents were recruited to training in neonatal resuscitation, with a high-fidelity simulated pre-test, immediate post-tests, and a retention test at 4 months. After training, they were randomized to either a refresher session at 3 weeks (18% of interval) or at 2 months (50%). Technical and non-technical skills were scored using validated checklists, knowledge with standardized questions. There was no difference between groups prior to the retention test. The early refresher group demonstrated significantly improved technical (mean ± 95% CI: 22.4 ± 1.3 v 18.2 ± 2.5, p = 0.02) and non-technical (31.0 ± 0.9 v 25.6 ± 3.1, p = 0.03) skill scores in the retention post-test compared to the late group. No difference was seen with knowledge scores. We conclude that both technical and non-technical aspects of neonatal resuscitation performance can benefit from an early refresher session. Session timings are critical and should be tailored to the desired length of skill retention. Findings may be generalizable to other interventions that depend on mixed types of memory.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by project grants from The Department of Innovation in Medical Education, University of Ottawa, and The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization. Dr. Boet was supported by The Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association. These organizations had no role in study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation, or in preparation of the manuscript and decision to submit for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was secured from the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board (Protocol #20120849-01H).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesPlease email corresponding author for data files.