<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Van de Winckel, Ann</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carpentier, Sydney T.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bottale, Sara</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Blackwood, Jena</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Deng, Wei</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zhang, Lin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hendrickson, Timothy J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mueller, Bryon A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nourian, Ruhollah</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Melander-Smith, Sheri</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Morse, Leslie R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lim, Kelvin O.</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Greater sustained sensorimotor function recovery and neuropathic pain reduction with Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation compared to adaptive fitness in adults with spinal cord injury: a pilot clinical trial</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">medRxiv</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2026</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2026-01-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><elocation-id><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2026.03.26.26349257</style></elocation-id><doi><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.64898/2026.03.26.26349257</style></doi><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"></style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"></style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Introduction Adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) often experience reduced or lost sensation and movement, impairing the ability of the brain to locate paralyzed body parts, which, in turn, compromises sensorimotor recovery. This disruption of the internal body map of the brain, or mental body representations (MBR), also contributes to neuropathic pain in about 69% of adults with SCI. Medications for neuropathic pain are often ineffective and can cause adverse reactions. Our previous pilot clinical trial showed that Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation (CMR), a physical therapy that restores MBR, produced significant, lasting reductions in neuropathic pain, improved sensorimotor function, and enhanced brain function. Building on these results, we examined whether 8 weeks of CMR or adaptive fitness (1) improved sensorimotor function and reduced pain; (2) greater brain activity and connectivity related to sensorimotor function and MBR in adults with SCI.Methods Sixteen participants (52+/-8 years old, 13+/-10 years post-SCI) were randomized to 8 weeks of CMR or adaptive fitness (45 min, 3x/week). Ten participants had neuropathic pain of 3/10 or greater. Pain and sensorimotor function were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), and Neuromuscular Recovery Scale (NRS). Functional MRI included resting-state and 4 tasks: imagining feeling the left leg, imagining moving the left leg, whole-body movement imagery, and a sensation task.Results After CMR, participants improved on AIS with large effect sizes (touch: d=1.54; pinprick: d=1.83; lower limb motor function: d=1.32), while adaptive fitness had small/moderate effects (touch: d=0.49; pinprick: d=0.53; lower limb motor function: d=0.74). CMR also showed larger effect sizes for NRS (core: d=2.19; upper limb: d=0.69; lower limb: d=0.74) than fitness (core: d=0.73; upper limb: d=0.34; lower limb: d=0.00). Benefits persisted at follow-up. Highest neuropathic pain intensity reduced post-CMR and at 3-month follow-up (d=0.48; d=0.63). Pain increased slightly after fitness (n=6; d=−0.19; d=−0.41). CMR increased brain connectivity and activation during the leg imagery task. Increased activation during whole-body imagery was greater after CMR than fitness.Discussion These preliminary results support the potential of CMR to improve function and reduce neuropathic pain in adults with SCI, warranting larger confirmatory trials.Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT05167032Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialClinicaltrial.gov: NCT05167032Funding StatementThe datasets generated for this study can be found in the Dryad repository, DOI: 10.5061/dryad.v6wwpzhbb upon publication of the manuscript in a peer-reviewed journal.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of the University of Minnesota (UMN) approved the study (STUDY00014710) on 2/28/2022.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated for this study can be found in the Dryad repository, DOI: 10.5061/dryad.v6wwpzhbb upon publication of the manuscript in a peer-reviewed journal.AISASIA Impairment ScaleANSAutonomic Standards Assessment formBARQ-RRevised Body Awareness Rating QuestionnaireCHART-SFCraig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique-Short FormCMRCognitive Multisensory RehabilitationDN4Douleur Neuropathique 4FASFunctionality Appreciation ScalefMRIfunctional Magnetic Resonance ImagingISNCSCIInternational Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord InjuryKVIQKinesthetic and Visual Imagery QuestionnaireMAIA-2Multidimensional Assessment Interoceptive Awareness – version 2MBRMental Body RepresentationsMCIDMinimum Clinically Important DifferenceMSESMoorong Self-Efficacy ScaleNPRSNumeric Pain Rating ScalePASPostural Awareness ScalePHQ-9Patient Health QuestionnairePSFSPatient-Specific Functional ScalePSQIPittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexSAI/TAIState Trait Anxiety InventorySCISpinal Cord InjurySCI-FI/ATSpinal Cord Injury Functional Index/Assistive TechnologySCI-QOLSpinal Cord Injury Quality of Life measurement systemTSKTampa Scale for KinesiophobiaVAVeterans Affairs</style></abstract></record></records></xml>