RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Two-tiered SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion screening in the Netherlands and stability of nucleocapsid, spike protein domain 1 and neutralizing antibodies
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.07.20187641
DO 10.1101/2020.10.07.20187641
A1 Anja Garritsen
A1 Anja Scholzen
A1 Daan W.A. van den Nieuwenhof
A1 Anke P.F. Smits
A1 E. Suzan Datema
A1 Luc S. van Galen
A1 Milou L.C.E. Kouwijzer
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/28/2020.10.07.20187641.abstract
AB Serological testing in the COVID-19 pandemic is mainly implemented to gain sero-epidemiological data, but can also retrospectively inform about suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. We verified and applied a two-tiered testing strategy combining a SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific lateral flow assay (LFA) with a nucleocapsid protein (NCP) IgG ELISA to assess seroconversion in n=7241 individuals. The majority had experienced symptoms consistent with COVID-19, but had no access to RT-PCR testing. Longitudinal follow-up in n=97 LFA+ individuals was performed up to 20 weeks after initial infection using NCP and spike protein S1 domain (S1) IgG ELISAs and a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). Individuals reporting symptoms from January 2020 onwards showed seroconversion, as did a considerable proportion of asymptomatic individuals. Seroconversion for symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals was higher in an area with a known infection cluster compared to a low incidence area. Overall, 94% of individuals with a positive IgG result by LFA were confirmed by NCP ELISA. The proportion of ELISA-confirmed LFA results declined over time, in line with contracting NCP IgG titers during longitudinal follow-up. Neutralizing antibody activity was considerably more stable than S1 and NCP IgG titers, and both reach a plateau after approximately 100 days. The sVNT proved to be not only highly specific, but also more sensitive than the specificity-focussed two-tiered serology approach. Our results demonstrate the high specificity of two-tiered serology testing and highlight the sVNT used as a valuable tool to support modelling of SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics, complement molecular testing and provide relevant information to individuals.Competing Interest StatementAG is a senior officer and shareholder, and AS, DWAvdN, APFS, ESD, LSvG and MLCEK are employees of Innatoss Laboratories B.V., which provides diagnostic screening for infectious diseases including SARS-CoV-2.Clinical TrialAll blood/serum samples and data reported in this article were submitted to Innatoss for diagnostic purposes. All individuals whose data are reported in this article provided written consent to the use of pseudonymized test outcomes and of surplus serum samples for additional analyses. The Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie Brabant, Tilburg, The Netherlands has waived the need for IRB approval of reuse of surplus diagnostics materials (NW2020-77).Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All blood/serum samples and data reported in this article were submitted to Innatoss for diagnostic purposes. All individuals whose data are reported in this article provided written consent to the use of pseudonymized test outcomes and of surplus serum samples for additional analyses. The Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie Brabant, Tilburg, The Netherlands has waived the need for IRB approval of reuse of surplus diagnostics materials (NW2020-77).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request