Disparities, Perceived Discrimination, and Patient-Clinician Communication in Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment: An All of Us Cohort Study - Moon, Jungyeon; Espinoza, J. Cesar Ignacio; Puzantian, Talia (medRxiv, 2026)
Background and Aims Alcohol use disorder (AUD) remains a major public health concern, with persistent disparities in access to evidence-based treatment. This study aimed to examine associations between perceived discrimination in healthcare settings (PDHS), patient-clinician communication (PCC), and receipt of treatment for AUD, and compared these with sociodemographic and insurance-related factors.Design Cross-sectional analysis using structural equation modeling (SEM), logistic and multinomial logistic regression, and machine learning approaches including SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).Setting United States, using data from the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program.Participants A total of 5,287 adults with AUD (mean age 61 years; 57% men), including 71.6% non-Hispanic White, 12.2% Black, and 8.6% Hispanic participants. Insurance coverage included 52% government (Medicaid/Medicare), 37% private, and 21% military with 19% reporting more than one type.Measurements Primary outcomes were receipt of Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy for AUD, examined as binary and multinomial outcomes. The primary exposure was PDHS, measured using a 7-item scale (range 7-35), with higher scores indicating more frequent discrimination. PCC, assessed using a 2-item scale (range 2-8) with higher scores indicating poorer communication, was examined as a potential mediator. Models were adjusted for age group, sex at birth, race/ethnicity, insurance type (government, private, military), household income, and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores (range 0-12).Findings PDHS was associated with poorer PCC (β = 0.209, p < 0.001), although communication was not independently associated with treatment receipt. The indirect pathway from discrimination to treatment via communication was not supported. Military insurance was the strongest predictor of treatment receipt, with 6-7 times higher odds compared with other insurance types. Higher AUDIT-C scores and greater PDHS were also associated with increased likelihood of treatment. In analyses restricted to civilian participants, PDHS showed a stronger association with treatment receipt, while PCC demonstrated more modest effects. Machine learning models identified PDHS, AUDIT-C, and PCC as strong contributors, with the impact of poor communication most pronounced among individuals with lower income.Conclusions Access to treatment for alcohol use disorder is most strongly associated with insurance coverage, particularly military insurance. PDHS and PCC also contribute to treatment engagement, with differential effects across socioeconomic groups. These findings highlight the importance of addressing structural and interpersonal barriers to improve equitable access to evidence-based AUD treatment.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive external funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study used de-identified data from the All of Us Research Program and did not involve human subjects as defined by federal regulations; therefore, Institutional Review Board approval was not required.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data used in this study are available from the All of Us Research Program. Access to the data requires registration and approval through the All of Us Researcher Workbench. https://www.researchallofus.org/ The data used in this study are available through the All of Us Research Program Controlled Tier (version 8) and can be accessed by authorized researchers via the All of Us Researcher Workbench.