TY - JOUR T1 - Standard Blood Laboratory as a Clinical Support Tool to Distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 Positive and Negative Patients JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.10.23.20217844 SP - 2020.10.23.20217844 AU - Rainer Thell AU - Jascha Zimmermann AU - Marton Szell AU - Sabine Tomez AU - Philip Eisenburger AU - Moritz Haugk AU - Anna Kreil AU - Alexander Spiel AU - Amelie Blaschke AU - Anna Klicpera AU - Oskar Janata AU - Walter Krugluger AU - Christian Sebesta AU - Harald Herkner AU - Brenda Laky Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/27/2020.10.23.20217844.abstract N2 - Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is current pandemic disease. Acute polymerase-chain-reaction is the gold standard test for this disease, is not available everywhere. Standard blood laboratory parameters may have diagnostic potential.Methods We evaluated standard blood laboratory parameters of 655 COVID-19 patients suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, who underwent PCR testing in one of five hospitals in Vienna, Austria. Additionally, clinical characteristics and 28-day outcome were obtained from medical records. We compared standard blood laboratory parameters, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between positive and negative PCR-tested patients and evaluated the ability of those parameters to distinguish between groups.Results Of the 590 study patients including 276 females and 314 males, aged between 20 and 100 years, 208 were tested positive by means of PCR. Patients with positive compared to negative PCR-tests had significantly lower levels of leukocytes, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, and thrombocytes; while significantly higher levels were detected with hemoglobin, C-reactive-protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), activated-partial-thromboplastin-time (aPTT), creatine-kinase (CK), lactate-dehydrogenase (LDH), alanine-aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate-aminotransferase (AST), and lipase. Our multivariate model correctly classified 83.9% of cases with a sensitivity of 78.4%, specificity of 87.3%, positive predictive value of 79.5%, and negative predictive value of 86.6%. Decreasing leucocytes and eosinophils and increasing hemoglobin and CRP were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of being COVID-19 positive tested.Conclusions Our findings suggest that especially leucocytes, eosinophils, hemoglobin, and CRP are helpful to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative tested patients and that a certain blood pattern is able to predict PCR-results.Summary Decreasing leucocytes and eosinophils and increasing hemoglobin and CRP were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of being COVID-19 positive tested. Each single parameter showed either a high sensitivity (leucocytes, eosinophils, CRP, monocytes, thrombocytes) or specificity (NLR, CK, ALT, lipase), or a sensitivity and specificity around 60% (Hb, LDH, AST).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Trial161/2020Funding StatementNo fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics Commission of the City of ViennaAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data acquired can be reviewed by any editor as wished. ER -