TY - JOUR T1 - Food Insecurity Increases in Brazil from 2004 to 2018: Analysis of national surveys JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.10.22.20217224 SP - 2020.10.22.20217224 AU - Rosana Salles-Costa AU - Aline Alves Ferreira AU - Ruben Araujo de Mattos AU - Michael E. Reichenheim AU - Rafael Pérez-Escamilla AU - Ana Maria Segall-Corrêa Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/26/2020.10.22.20217224.abstract N2 - Objective Describe secular changes in food security (FS) and severe food insecurity (FI) in Brazil.Design We analyzed four national surveys that assessed FI with the Brazilian Household Food Insecurity Measurement Scale (EBIA), and estimated the percentage changes of FS/FI levels between 2004 and 2013 (1st period) and between 2013 and 2018 (2nd period) by sociodemographic variables.Setting Data from the cross-sectional Brazilian National Households Sample Surveys (2004, 2009 and 2013) and Household Budget Survey (2018).Participants Nationally representative samples of household surveys (2004=112,530; 2009=120,910;2013=116,196; and 2018=57,920).Results The 1st period was marked by a significant increase in FS (+18.9%) and by a reduction in severe FI (−53.6%). The 2nd period showed a decrease in FS (−18.2%) and an increase of severe FI (+43.8%). The greater increase FS in the 1st period was in the Northeast (+33.4%), among households with more than 7 residents (+40.8%), and in households where the reference person self-identified as black or mulatto (+27.6%). In the 2nd period, the lower increase in severe FI was observed among households with children under 4 years old (+ 6.3%) and with members over 65 years old (+12.5%).Conclusions After a significant reduction in FS from 2004 to 2013, FS was strongly compromised from 2014 to 2018 likely as result of disruptions in access to foods in all regions, intensified by the sociodemographic inequality in Brazil. Hunger in Brazil has re-emerged as a national concern.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNone.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:In according to Resolution No. 466, of December 12, 2012 from National Committee of Ethics in Research (CONEP), researches that used secondary data available to the public domain, as occurs in this research that used data available to the public domain by Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), the approval by an local Ethic Committee CEP-CONEP System was not required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis paper used secondary data available to the public domain by Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). ER -