PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - S. Loomba AU - A. de Figueiredo AU - S. J. Piatek AU - K. de Graaf AU - H. J. Larson TI - Measuring the Impact of Exposure to COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Vaccine Intent in the UK and US AID - 10.1101/2020.10.22.20217513 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.10.22.20217513 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/26/2020.10.22.20217513.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/26/2020.10.22.20217513.full AB - The successful development and widespread acceptance of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine will be a major step in fighting the pandemic, yet obtaining high uptake will be a challenging task, worsened by online misinformation. To help inform successful COVID-19 vaccination campaigns in the UK and US, we conducted a survey to quantify how online misinformation impacts COVID-19 vaccine uptake intent and identify socio-economic groups that are most at-risk of non-vaccination and most susceptible to online misinformation. Here, we report findings from nationally representative surveys in the UK and the US conducted in September 2020. We show that recent misinformation around a COVID-19 vaccine induces a fall in vaccination intent among those who would otherwise “definitely” vaccinate by 6.4 (3.8, 9.0) percentages points in the UK and 2.4 (0.1, 5.0) in the US, with larger decreases found in intent to vaccinate to protect others. We find evidence that socio-econo-demographic, political, and trust factors are associated with low intent to vaccinate and susceptibility to misinformation: notably, older age groups in the US are more susceptible to misinformation. We find evidence that scientific-sounding misinformation relating to COVID-19 and vaccines COVID-19 vaccine misinformation lowers vaccination intent, while corresponding factual information does not. These findings reveal how recent COVID-19 misinformation can impact vaccination rates and suggest pathways to robust messaging campaigns.Competing Interest StatementHJL and AdF are involved in Vaccine Confidence Project collaborative grants with GlaxoSmithKline and Merck. SP and HJL are involved with Vaccine Confidence Project collaborative grants with Janssen. HJL has also received other support for participating in Merck meetings and GlaxoSmithKline advisory roundtables. HJL is a member of the Merck Vaccine Confidence Advisory Board. SL and KdG declare no competing interests.Funding StatementThis study was funded by UN's Verified Initiative.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approval for this study was obtained by the LSHTM ethics committee on 15 June 2020 with reference 22130.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data for this study will be made publicly upon successful acceptance and peer review.