RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Five Year Pediatric Use of a Digital Wearable Fitness Device: Lessons from a Pilot Case Study JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.10.21.20215491 DO 10.1101/2020.10.21.20215491 A1 Kimayani D. Butte A1 Amir Bahmani A1 Atul J. Butte A1 Xiao Li A1 Michael P. Snyder YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/26/2020.10.21.20215491.abstract AB Objectives Wearable fitness devices are increasingly used by the general population, with new applications being proposed and designed for healthy adults as well as adults with chronic diseases. Fewer, if any, studies of these devices have been conducted in healthy adolescents and teenagers, especially over a long period of time. The goal of this work was to document the successes and challenges involved in 5 years of a wearable fitness device use in a pediatric case study.Materials and Methods Comparison of five years of step counts and minutes asleep from a teenaged girl and her father.Results At 60 months, this may be the longest reported pediatric study involving a wearable fitness device, and the first simultaneously involving a parent and a child. We find step counts to be significantly higher for both the adult and teen on school/work days, along with less sleep. The teen walked significantly less towards the end of the 5 year study. Surprisingly, many of the adult’s and teen’s sleeping and step counts were correlated, possibly due to coordinated behaviors.Discussion We end with several recommendations for pediatricians and device manufacturers, including the need for constant adjustments of stride length and calorie counts as teens are growing.Conclusion With periodic adjustments for growth, this pilot study shows these devices can be used for more accurate and consistent measurements in adolescents and teenagers over longer periods of time, to potentially promote healthy behaviors.Competing Interest StatementMichael Snyder is a cofounder and is on the scientific advisory board of Personalis, Filtircine, SensOmics, Qbio, January, Mirvie, Oralome, and Proteus. He is also on the scientific advisory board of Genapsys and Jupiter. Atul Butte is a co-founder and consultant to Personalis and NuMedii; consultant to Samsung, Mango Tree Corporation, and in the recent past, 10x Genomics, Helix, Pathway Genomics, and Verinata (Illumina); has served on paid advisory panels or boards for Geisinger Health, Regenstrief Institute, Gerson Lehman Group, AlphaSights, Covance, Novartis, Genentech, Merck, and Roche; is a shareholder in Personalis and NuMedii; is a minor shareholder in Apple, Facebook, Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, Amazon, Snap, 10x Genomics, Illumina, CVS, Nuna Health, Assay Depot, Vet24seven, Regeneron, Sanofi, Royalty Pharma, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Biogen, Paraxel, and Sutro, and several other non-health related companies and mutual funds; and has received honoraria and travel reimbursement for invited talks from Johnson and Johnson, Roche, Genentech, Pfizer, Merck, Lilly, Takeda, Varian, Mars, Siemens, Optum, Abbott, Celgene, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Westat, and many academic institutions, medical or disease specific foundations and associations, and health systems. Atul Butte receives royalty payments through Stanford University, for several patents and other disclosures licensed to NuMedii and Personalis. Atul Butte's research has been funded by NIH, Northrup Grumman (as the prime on an NIH contract), Genentech, Johnson and Johnson, FDA, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Leon Lowenstein Foundation, Intervalien Foundation, Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg, the Barbara and Gerson Bakar Foundation, and in the recent past, the March of Dimes, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, L'Oreal, and Progenity. The other authors declare no competing interests.Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics: Two authors (including the lead author) collected their own data as citizen-scientists, with their own devices that they obtained commercially through Amazon.com, initiated the analyses, then approached the Stanford investigators to enhance the analyses, and both of these authors contributed to writing this manuscript. This citizen-science research project was initiated outside of an academic institution, was run by the two authors with their own data, had no Federal funding, and the research is not related to an FDA or EPA-regulated product, so as such does not need to undergo Institutional Review Board review, as per Resnik [Resnik, D. B. Citizen Scientists as Human Subjects: Ethical Issues. Citiz. Sci. Theory Pract. 4, 11 (2019)]. Regardless, the two data contributors joined Stanford University research protocol 56378 approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board, specifically allowing participants at or over age 13 years to share their past and current Fitbit measurement data with Stanford investigators for research purposes, with informed consent.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe sleep and step count data for the adult and teen used in this analysis are publicly available through Github: https://github.com/kimibutte/Fitbit-Data. https://github.com/kimibutte/Fitbit-Data