RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Disorder- and emotional context-specific neurofunctional alterations during inhibitory control in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.16.20214114
DO 10.1101/2020.10.16.20214114
A1 Congcong Liu
A1 Jing Dai
A1 Yuanshu Chen
A1 Ziyu Qi
A1 Fei Xin
A1 Qian Zhuang
A1 Xinqi Zhou
A1 Feng Zhou
A1 Lizhu Luo
A1 Yulan Huang
A1 Jinyu Wang
A1 Zhili Zou
A1 Huafu Chen
A1 Keith M Kendrick
A1 Bo Zhou
A1 Xiaolei Xu
A1 Benjamin Becker
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/20/2020.10.16.20214114.abstract
AB Background Major Depressive (MDD) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) are highly debilitating and often co-morbid disorders. The disorders exhibit partly overlapping dysregulations on the behavioral and neurofunctional level, and the determination of disorder-specific alterations may promote neuro-mechanistic and diagnostic specificity.Methods In order to determine disorder-specific alterations in the domain of emotion-cognition interactions the present study examined emotional context-specific inhibitory control in treatment-naïve, first-episode MDD (n = 37) and GAD (n = 35) patients and healthy controls (n = 35) by employing a validated affective go/no-go fMRI paradigm.Findings On the behavioral level MDD but not GAD patients exhibited impaired inhibitory control irrespective of emotional context. On the neural level, no alterations were observed during the positive context, yet specifically MDD patients demonstrated attenuated recruitment of a broad bilateral network encompassing inferior/medial parietal, posterior frontal, and mid-cingulate regions during inhibitory control in the negative context. GAD patients exhibited a stronger engagement of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex relative to MDD patients and within the GAD group better inhibitory control in negative contexts was associated with higher recruitment of this region.Interpretation Findings from the present study suggest disorder- and emotional context-specific behavioral and neurofunctional deficits in inhibitory control in MDD in negative emotional contexts and may point to a depression-specific neuropathological and diagnostic marker. In contrast, GAD patients may maintain intact inhibitory performance via compensatory recruitment of prefrontal regulatory regions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFA0701400, BB) and Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province, China (2017JY0031, JD). The funding sources had no involvement in the study design, data collection and analysis, results interpretation, or writing of the paper.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Protocols had full ethical approval by the ethics board at the University of Electronic Science and TechnologyAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data sharing adopted by the authors comply with the requirements of the funding institute and with institutional ethics approval.