TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of authors understanding of the STROBE-nut reporting guidelines JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.10.15.20211268 SP - 2020.10.15.20211268 AU - Dana Hawwash AU - Michelle Seck AU - Elisa Quaranta AU - Patrick Kolsteren AU - Carl Lachat Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/20/2020.10.15.20211268.abstract N2 - Objectives To test authors’ experience of applying the STrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-nutritional epidemiology (STROBE-nut) on a recently published paper. Correct understanding of the items on the reporting guidelines could lead to appropriate use.Design a cross sectional study, with a convenient sample.Setting Participants were asked to return the STROBE-nut data collection template filled on recently published papers. Next, an interview was organised to collect feedback on the process of applying the guidelines. Two researchers involved in the development of STROBE-nut completed the template using the participant’s respective published papers. The filled templates were then compared to assess the measure of agreement of the STROBE-nut items as a proxy of understanding.Participants Authors who recently published papers reporting dietary assessment or food intake data.Results We recruited 12 participants between May 2018 and June 2019. Five participants never used reporting guidelines before, while ten reported intention of future use. Half of the participants reported that the use of filling STROBE nut was useful, but some modifications are needed. Agreement between participants and experts on items reporting was generally low. Only two items had moderate weighted kappa agreement nut 1 (Kappa= 0.4, P 0.02) and nut 22.1 (Kappa= 0.47, P 0.01).Conclusions There is need to ensure correct understanding of STROBE-nut by authors. Revisions of STROBE-nut that make the items shorter and simpler can increase understanding. Training researchers at early stage on the aim of reporting guidelines could potentially increase proper use and decrease subjective interpretation.Competing Interest StatementAuthors (CL DH PK,) have developed STROBE nut for nutritional epidemiology cited in this manuscript.Funding StatementDH is supported by the special research fund (BOF) from Ghent University. CL has received funding by the FWO Research Foundation - Flanders, grant number G0D4815N. There was no other outside funding for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ghent University Hospital number EC /2018/0636. Informed consent was electronically collected and the study protocol was registered prior to the study (2nd May 2018) on https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8563182.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAnonymised data is added as Annex 5.EQUATORThe Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health ResearchCONSORTThe Consolidated Standards Of Reporting TrialsCONSORT-NPT 2017The Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic TreatmentsPRISMAthe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses StatementSTROBEthe Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyStatement, and “STROBE-nutthe STrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-nutritional epidemiology statement ER -