RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Biosecurity uptake and perceived risk of avian influenza among people in contact with birds
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2025.04.23.25326059
DO 10.1101/2025.04.23.25326059
A1 Whitlow, Harry
A1 Gokool, Suzanne
A1 Clapp, Genevieve
A1 Bueno, Irene
A1 Logunleko, Mariam
A1 Moore, Peter
A1 Masterton, Sarah
A1 Taylor-Egbeyemi, Jo
A1 Brown, Ian
A1 Pae, Riinu
A1 Smith, Louise E
A1 Brooks-Pollock, Ellen
A1 Thomas, Amy C
YR 2025
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2025/07/29/2025.04.23.25326059.abstract
AB Introduction Recent intercontinental spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5N1) among kept and wild birds, and transmission to mammalian hosts, including cattle and humans, has heightened the need to review public health risk assessments. Biosecurity is essential for limiting disease spread, but how widely practices are implemented is not fully known.Methods Here, we report on uptake of biosecurity measures and risk perception of avian influenza virus (AIV) in the context of preventing zoonotic transmission to persons potentially at high risk of exposure. Questionnaire data from 225 people in contact with birds in the UK (Avian Contact Study, May to July 2024) was analysed.Results We found hand washing after contact with birds was the most common biosecurity measure implemented (89%, 196/218), followed by using disinfecting footwear dips (78%, 170/218). Individuals in contact with a higher number of birds were more likely to use at least one PPE measure for the face or body (χ2 (1, n=217) = 32.452, p<0.001) or at least one footwear-related PPE measure (Df=1, n=217, p<0.001). The perceived risk of AIV to the health of birds was high for individuals in contact with large flocks (≥1001 birds) and associated with uptake of at least one footwear-related PPE measure (χ2 (1, n=185)= 9.171, p=0.002). Perceived risk of AIV to respondents’ own health was low, regardless of the number of birds a respondent had daily contact with.Conclusions Routinely used biosecurity measures are implemented to limit AIV spread among birds, but not with the purpose of limiting zoonotic transmission from birds to humans. Identifying cohort characteristics which could lead to low BM uptake, alongside barriers and facilitators to BM uptake is important for informing zoonotic AIV public health campaigns.ImpactsBiosecurity uptake among individuals in contact with birds is likely influenced by the perceived risk to avian health, but not human health.Individuals working in contact with a greater number of birds are more likely to use biosecurity measures, reflective of farm operation size. Public health strategies may need to specifically target small flock holders to improve biosecurity.Attitudes towards avian influenza virus infections in humans need further characterisation to determine barriers for increasing uptake and effectiveness of avian influenza public health measures.Competing Interest StatementLES, SG, SM, JT and RP are employees of the UK Health Security Agency. LES receives consultancy fees from the Sanofi group of companies and other life sciences companies. PM is an employee of the Animal Plant and Health Agency. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UKHSA or the Department of Health and Social Care.Funding StatementFunding for the Avian Contact Study was awarded by PolicyBristol from the Research England QR Policy Support Fund (QR PSF) 2022-24 for investigating Zoonotic spillover of avian influenza. AT is funded by the Wellcome Trust, Early Career Award [227041/Z/23/Z]. EBP acknowledges support from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Evaluation and Behavioural Science at the University of Bristol (NIHR207385).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the University of Bristol, Faculty Research Ethics Committee, approval number 17048 on 16 January 2024. Informed written consent (using e-consent hosted on Research Electronic Data CAPture tools, REDCap) for the use of data collected via the questionnaire was obtained from respondents.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesRepository data.bris: The Avian Contact Study: questionnaire data 15 May - 31 July 2024. Data are openly available at the University of Bristol Research Data Repository data.bris.ac.uk. Source code is available from Github. https://github.com/amythomas/aviancontactstudy/ https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.3nmqsrbv5ruom2abn0ql6e8yh2