RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 NHS Hospital ‘Learning from Deaths’ reports: A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the first year of a countrywide patient safety programme
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.15.20213132
DO 10.1101/2020.10.15.20213132
A1 Zoe Brummell
A1 Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
A1 Dorit Braun
A1 S. Ramani Moonesinghe
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/18/2020.10.15.20213132.abstract
AB Introduction Potentially preventable deaths occur worldwide within healthcare organisations. Organisational learning from incidents is essential to improve quality of care. In England, inconsistencies in how NHS secondary care trusts reviewed, investigated and shared learning from deaths, resulted in the introduction of national guidance on ‘Learning from Deaths’ (LfDs) in 2017. This guidance provides a ‘framework for identifying, reporting, investigating and learning from deaths’. Amendments to NHS Quality Account regulations, legally require NHS trusts in England to report quantitative and qualitative information relating to patient deaths annually. The programme intended trusts would share this learning and take measurable action to prevent future deaths.Method We undertook qualitative and quantitative secondary data analysis of all NHS secondary care trust LfDs reports within their 2017/18 Quality Accounts, to review how organisations are using the LfDs programme to learn from and prevent, potentially preventable deaths.Results All statutory elements of LfDs reporting were reported by 98 out of 222 (44%) trusts. The percentage of deaths judged more likely than not due to problems in healthcare was between 0% and 13%. The majority of trusts (89%) reported lessons learnt; the most common learning theme was poor communication. 106 out of 222 trusts (48%) have shared or plan to share the learning within their own organisation. The majority of trusts (86%) reported actions taken and 47% discussed or had a plan for assessment of impact. 37 out of 222 trusts (17%) mentioned involvement of bereaved families.Conclusions The wide variation in reporting demonstrates that some trusts have engaged fully with LfDs, while other trusts appear to have disengaged with the programme. This may reveal a disparity in organisational learning and patient safety culture which could result in inequity for bereaved families. Many themes identified from the LfD reports have previously been identified in national and international reports and inquiries. Further work is needed to strengthen the LfDs programme.Competing Interest StatementZB worked at NHS Improvement in the medical directorate from August 2017 to August 2018, during which time she undertook some work on the LfDs programme. SRM currently works for NHS England/Improvement as National Clinical Director for Critical and Perioperative Care.Funding StatementThis study was supported by UCL Biomedical Research Centre Patient and Public Involvement starter funding (BRC617/PPI/ZB/104990)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study is an analysis of publicly available data and does not require ethical approval.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData for this study is publicly available from the 2017/18 NHS Quality Accounts