RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 transmission on contacts and mixing patterns in the Netherlands: repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2016/2017, April 2020 and June 2020
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.18.20101501
DO 10.1101/2020.05.18.20101501
A1 Jantien A. Backer
A1 Liesbeth Mollema
A1 R.A. Eric Vos
A1 Don Klinkenberg
A1 Fiona R.M. van der Klis
A1 Hester E. de Melker
A1 Susan van den Hof
A1 Jacco Wallinga
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/16/2020.05.18.20101501.abstract
AB Background During the current COVID-19 pandemic many countries have taken drastic measures to reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. These often include decreasing the number of contacts by physical distancing.Aim To measure the actual reduction of contacts when physical distancing measures are implemented.Methods In the Netherlands, a cross-sectional survey was carried out in 2016/2017 in which participants reported the number and age of their contacts during the previous day. The survey was repeated among a subsample of the participants in April 2020 after physical distancing measures had been implemented, and in an extended sample in June 2020 after some of these measures were relaxed.Results The average number of community contacts per day was reduced from on average 14.9 (interquartile range: 4-20) in the 2016/2017 survey to 3.5 (0-4) after physical distancing measures were implemented, and rebounded to 8.8 (1-10) after some of these measures were relaxed. All age groups restricted their number of community contacts to at most 5 contacts on average after physical distancing measures were implemented. After relaxation, children reverted to baseline levels while elderly had a number of community contacts that was less than half their baseline levels.Conclusion The physical distancing measures have greatly reduced contact numbers, which has likely been beneficial in curbing the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands. Different age groups reacted differently upon relaxation of these measures. These findings offer guidance for the deployment of age-targeted measures in the future course of the pandemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was financed by the Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme - project EpiPose (grant agreement number 101003688).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The MEC-U (Medical Research Ethics Committees United; R20.022) has approved the research protocol "Third population-based immune surveillance study used for the evaluation of immunity against SARS-CoV-2 (PIENTER Corona)" and written informed consent was obtained from all adult participants, and parents or legal guardians of minors included in the study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData of contact matrices shown in Fig. 4 are provided in tab separated file S2_contact_matrices.tsv.