PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Carissa Bonner AU - Erin Cvejic AU - Julie Ayre AU - Jennifer Isautier AU - Christopher Semsarian AU - Brooke Nickel AU - Carys Batcup AU - Kristen Pickles AU - Rachael Dodd AU - Samuel Cornell AU - Tessa Copp AU - Kirsten McCaffery TI - Impact of COVID-19 Restrictions on People with Hypertension AID - 10.1101/2020.10.12.20211722 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.10.12.20211722 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/14/2020.10.12.20211722.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/14/2020.10.12.20211722.full AB - Objectives It is unclear how people with hypertension are responding to the COVID-19 pandemic given their increased risk, and whether targeted public health strategies are needed.Design This retrospective case-control study compared people with hypertension to matched healthy controls during COVID-19 lockdown, to determine whether they have higher risk perceptions, anxiety and prevention intentions.Methods Baseline data from a national survey were collected in April 2020 during COVID-19 lockdown. Of 4362 baseline participants, 466 people reported hypertension with no other chronic conditions, and were randomly matched to healthy controls with similar age, gender, education and health literacy. A subset (n=1369) was followed-up at 2 months after restrictions eased, including 147 participants with hypertension only. Risk perceptions, prevention intentions and anxiety were measured.Results At baseline, perceived seriousness was high for both hypertension and control groups. The hypertension group had higher anxiety than controls; and were more willing to have the influenza vaccine. At follow-up, these differences were no longer present in the longitudinal sub-sample. Perceived seriousness and anxiety had decreased, but vaccine intentions for both influenza and COVID-19 remained high (>80%).Conclusions Anxiety was above normal levels during the COVID-19 lockdown. This was higher in the hypertension group, who also had higher vaccination intentions. Locations with prolonged restrictions may require targeted mental health screening for vulnerable groups. Despite a decrease in perceived risk and anxiety after 2 months of lockdown restrictions, vaccination intentions for both influenza and COVID-19 remained high, which is encouraging for future prevention of COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Sydney Human Ethics Committee Project number: 2020/212All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available from corresponding author upon reasonable request.