The economic burden of zoonotic Plasmodium knowlesi malaria on households in Sabah, Malaysia compared to malaria from human-only Plasmodium species.

Background
The emergence of the zoonotic monkey parasite Plasmodium knowlesi as the dominant cause of malaria in Malaysia has disrupted current national WHO elimination goals. Malaysia has free universal access to malaria care; however, out-of-pocket costs are unknown. This study estimated household costs of illness attributable to malaria due to P. knowlesi against other non-zoonotic Plasmodium species infections in Sabah, Malaysia.


Methodology/Principal Findings
Household costs were estimated from patient-level surveys collected from four hospitals between 2013 and 2016. Direct costs including medical and associated travel costs, and indirect costs due to lost productivity were included. One hundred and fifty-two malaria cases were enrolled: P. knowlesi (n=108), P. vivax (n=22), P. falciparum (n=16), and P. malariae (n=6). Costs were inflated to 2022 Malaysian Ringgits and reported in United States dollars (US$). Across all cases, the mean total costs were US$138 (SD=108), with productivity losses accounting for 58% of costs (US$80; SD=73). P. vivax had the highest mean total household cost at US$210, followed by P. knowlesi (US$127), P. falciparum (US$126), and P. malariae (US$105). Most patients (80%) experienced direct health costs above 10% of monthly income, with 58 (38%) patients experiencing health spending over 25% of monthly income, consistent with catastrophic health expenditure.


Conclusions/Significance
Despite Malaysia's free health-system care for malaria, patients and families face other related medical, travel, and indirect costs. Household out-of-pocket costs were driven by productivity losses; primarily attributed to infections in working-aged males in rural agricultural-based occupations. Costs for P. knowlesi were comparable to P. falciparum and lower than P. vivax. The higher P. vivax costs related to direct health facility costs for repeat monitoring visits given the liver-stage treatment required.


AUTHOR SUMMARY
Knowlesi malaria is due to infection with a parasite transmitted by mosquitos from monkeys to humans. Most people who are infected work or live near the forest. It is now the major type of malaria affecting humans in Malaysia. The recent increase of knowlesi malaria cases in humans has impacted individuals, families, and health systems in Southeast Asia. Although the region has made substantial progress towards eliminating human-only malaria species, knowlesi malaria threatens elimination targets as traditional control measures do not address the parasite reservoir in monkeys. The economic burden of illness due to knowlesi malaria has not previously been estimated or subsequently compared with other malaria species. We collected data on the cost of illness to households in Sabah, Malaysia, to estimate their related total economic burden. Medical costs and time off work and usual activities were substantial in patients with the four species of malaria diagnosed during the time of this study. This research highlights the financial burden which households face when seeking care for malaria in Malaysia, despite the free treatment provided by the government.


AUTHOR SUMMARY (178/150-200 words)
Knowlesi malaria is due to infection with a parasite transmitted by mosquitos from monkeys to humans.Most people who are infected work or live near the forest.It is now the major type of malaria affecting humans in Malaysia.The recent increase of knowlesi malaria cases in humans has impacted individuals, families, and health systems in Southeast Asia.Although the region has made substantial progress towards eliminating human-only malaria species, knowlesi malaria threatens elimination targets as traditional control measures do not address the parasite reservoir in monkeys.The economic burden of illness due to knowlesi malaria has not previously been estimated or subsequently compared with other malaria species.We collected data on the cost of illness to households in Sabah, Malaysia, to estimate their related total economic burden.Medical costs and time off work and usual activities were substantial in patients with the four species of malaria diagnosed during the time of this study.This research highlights the financial burden which households face when seeking care for malaria in Malaysia, despite the free treatment provided by the government.

INTRODUCTION
Malaria is a vector-borne disease caused by infection with parasitic protozoa of the Plasmodium genus, which continues to exert a high health burden and cost in endemic settings [1,2].Six Plasmodium species commonly cause malaria in humans: P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, P. ovale walikeri, P. ovale curtisi and P. knowlesi [3].Since P. falciparum and P. vivax have historically caused the most significant health burden in humans, elimination efforts have primarily focused on these species [4].Malaysia is now nearing elimination of nonzoonotic malaria with no indigenous cases of P. falciparum and P. vivax reported in the country for the last 5 years [1].
. The emergence of zoonotic P. knowlesi transmission since 2004 threatens progress towards WHO malaria elimination goals for endemic countries in Southeast Asia.P. knowlesi is now the major cause of malaria in Malaysia, with public health notifications increasing to 3000-4000 cases per year in 2017 and remaining at this level currently [5][6][7].P. knowlesi infection also carries a high risk of severe disease, estimated at 6-9% of symptomatic cases presenting to health facilities in East Malaysia, comparable with previous risk for falciparum malaria in sympatric areas [5,[8][9][10].Human infections with P. knowlesi occur in areas inhabited by natural macaque hosts where it is transmitted to humans via Anopheles Leucosphyrus Group mosquito vectors [11].Due to the lack of effectiveness of traditional malaria public health control methods for zoonotic transmission primarily at the forest-edge [12,13], the need for inter-sectoral approaches has been recommended for P. knowlesi [14].
P. knowlesi malaria is most prevalent in males aged between 20 and 40 years in Malaysia, who are the most active reported demographic in formal employment [8,15,16].Males within this age group are more susceptible to acquisition of zoonotic malaria due to working outside in rural areas in proximity to forest edges, related to agricultural activities such as farming, forestry, palm oil and rubber plantations [12,13].More than half of P. knowlesi cases nationally have been attributed to agriculture and plantation-based work activities, with considerable remaining cases linked to timber logging and forestry work [14].
The increase in the incidence of P. knowlesi [14] is primarily in the East Malaysia states of Sabah and Sarawak on the island of Borneo [17].Sabah, the nation's third most populous state, consists predominantly of rural agricultural areas with tropical rainforest and large areas of mountainous terrain, which combined with large-scale deforestation primarily for oil-palm plantations and rural population growth have created an environment suitable for zoonotic malaria transmission [16,[18][19][20].In 2017 Sabah accounted for 45% of all reported malaria cases in Malaysia, with an almost five times greater annual case-incidence than the national average [19].
Malaria carries a significant financial burden to both health systems and the individuals, families, and communities experiencing the disease.[2] Malaysia has free universal access to malaria screening, testing, and treatment through public health facilities [21,22].However, to our knowledge, the out-of-pocket costs to households for related travel, medicines and healthcare visits have not been previously estimated.High out-of-pocket payments required for healthcare services can potentially cause adverse consequences for patients and their families, often disproportionally affecting low-income households [23].
This study used a household perspective to measure and value out-of-pocket costs and productivity losses for a single malaria episode as part of a survey collected at health facilities in Sabah, Malaysia between 2013 and 2016, a period during which malaria was caused by both zoonotic and non-zoonotic Plasmodium species.

Ethics
The study was approved by relevant institutional review boards in Malaysia, including the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health, Malaysia (NMRR-12-537-12568) and the Human Research Ethics Committee of Menzies School of Health Research, Australia (HREC-2012-1814).All adult participants provided written informed consent, with parental/guardian written informed consent gained for participants less than 18 years of age. .

Study design and participants
The cost surveys were collected alongside a larger epidemiological study conducted in Sabah, Malaysia, between February 2013 and September 2016 [12].In line with national guidelines in Malaysia, all microscopically confirmed malaria cases required mandatory hospitalization for clinical management, including antimalarial drug treatment until at least two sequential microscopy slides are negative for malaria.A subset of patients presented initially to primary clinics prior to referral to the appropriate district or tertiary level hospital for admission.A retrospective, cross-sectional cost survey was conducted across three district hospitals: Kudat, Kota Marudu, and Pitas, and one tertiary referral hospital in Kota Kinabalu.A pre-tested, structured, closed-ended questionnaire [24] was directly administered by trained research nurses to malaria patients or caregivers at around 14 to 28 days after hospital admission to estimate the costs of a single malaria episode.Participants were included based upon an initial microscopic diagnosis of malaria, with final Plasmodium species determined by the laboratory PCR result.
A subset of patients were recorded as having severe malaria as classified by WHO research criteria [25].These criteria included one or more of the following: impaired consciousness, acidosis, hypoglycemia, severe malarial anemia, acute kidney injury, jaundice, respiratory distress, significant bleeding, shock, or hyperparasitemia (defined as a parasite count >100,000/µL) [26].

Data collection and valuation of productivity losses
Household out-of-pocket costs were reported in Malaysian Ringgits.The out-of-pocket costs incurred by a household from a single malaria case was estimated using an ingredients-based approach.Total household costs were presented as aggregate costs of direct, indirect, and other costs for a single episode of malaria.Other costs included any additional expenses that patients incurred during their illness.Patients were not asked about the source of these costs.
Direct costs include all out-of-pocket expenses a patient incurred for diagnosis, hospital stays, clinic visits for follow-up monitoring, medical treatments, inpatient food or drink, over-thecounter medication, and transport while seeking medical care.Direct costs were used to determine catastrophic health expenditure, determined as direct, out-of-pocket expenditures while seeking treatment exceeding 10% and 25% of total monthly household income [27].Two alternate sources of monthly income [28,29] were also used as separate thresholds to calculate catastrophic health expenditure, to estimate the sensitivity of these results.
Indirect costs for patients were expressed as lost productivity, reported in the survey as "days unable to work (or decreased work) or go to school" due to the malaria episode.Indirect costs were measured using a human capital approach [30].Reduced work hours due to illness was the sum of survey respondents absent time from work prior to presenting to hospital, the number of days hospitalized, and the number of recovery days after hospital discharge when patients were unable to work.For children who were below the minimum age of employment (16 years), only the productivity losses for caregivers were included.The value of a day of lost wages was self-reported in the survey, and for adults who reported lost time but did not disclose income (34% of adults), the mean wage of the recorded income from all others was used.
Indirect costs for caregivers were the number of days when additional care was needed for the patient and/or if the patient required someone else to care for their dependents.Caregiver costs were estimated using a proxy good approach [31].We valued caregiver days lost as equivalent to 50% of the average reported lost daily wage for patients.Since 66% (63/96) of patients in this dataset who reported being looked after by someone were also unable to look after their own dependents, the reduced wage estimate has been used to avoid double counting.This conservative approach minimizes the potential overestimation of caregiving as it is likely the same caregiver could be used for the patient and their dependents.

Data Analysis
Patient data analysis was performed using STATA statical software, version 16 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).Costs were inflated [32] before conversion to 2022 US dollars (US$), equating to an approximate conversion of 4.4 MYR to 1 USD$ [33].The mean and standard deviations (SD) were calculated, and uncertainty for household costs was handled by performing a univariate sensitivity analysis of key parameters.Mann-Whitney tests were used to identify statistically significant differences in costs between groups with two outcomes, such as sex, and severe and non-severe malaria.A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to identify differences in household costs between individuals with malaria grouped by the four Plasmodium species [34].Additionally, a generalized linear model (GLM) was used to model the marginal effect on total cost of severe malaria, sex, anemia status, human-only malaria status and age (while holding all other variables constant) using a gamma-distributed dependent variable with a log link, as appropriate for this data [35].
For the evaluation of lost productivity, five scenario analyses were performed.In Scenario 1, productivity loss costs were limited to those patients who self-reported lost wage earnings.In Scenario 2, local wage estimates derived from a government-validated source (Malaysian Household Income Survey [28]) was used for all adults.For Scenario 3 we applied the local wage estimate to all participants (including children).For Scenarios 4 and 5, the lost wage was taken from a modelled regression analysis of the household income survey controlling for rurality and ethnicity (Malaysian Household inequities survey [29]) and applied to adults only and then to all participants, respectively. .

Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants
Data were collected for 152 participants presenting with a confirmed episode of malaria.The mean length of time from enrolment to performing the interview was 31 days.Characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1.The mean age was 32 years old (SD = 18), and 75% (114/152) were male.The majority of patients were diagnosed with P. knowlesi infections (71%, 108/152).Seven (5%) patients met the WHO research criteria for severe malaria; all were due to P. knowlesi infection.Most patients (73%, 110/151) had at least mild anemia (WHO age/sex criteria [36]) during their malaria episode, though the anemia status was not known for one patient.No patients died during this study.The mean monthly income for all working-age adults who reported income (N=80) was US$156 (SD = 122).

Time Losses due to malaria illness
Overall, the average number of days participants were unable to complete their usual activities due to illness was 9.2 (SD = 6.5) (Table 2).P. vivax (10.8 days) and P. falciparum (10.3 days) had a higher number of days affected by illness compared to P. knowlesi (8.7 days) and P. malariae (8.4 days).The average number of days lost to illness increased to 13.9 (SD = 15.6) for severe P. knowlesi cases, comparatively higher than non-severe P. knowlesi cases at 8.3 days (SD = 6.5, p = 0.141) and all non-zoonotic malaria (P.falciparum, P. vivax and P. malariae) cases at 10.4 days (SD = 5.80, p = 0.477).
Patients reported an average length of stay in hospital of 4.1 days (SD=1.5;range 1-10 days).
The length of hospitalization for severe knowlesi malaria cases (mean = 5.8 days, SD = 1.4) was higher than for non-severe malaria cases due to any species (mean = 4.0 days, SD = 1.4,p=0.004).Three patients (2%) were admitted within hospital to a high dependency clinical unit for a mean of 3.3 days; however, of these only a single patient was subsequently categorized as severe malaria using research criteria.
Eighty-eight patients (58%) reported being unable to fulfill their role as primary caregiver for their household for a mean of 3.9 days during their illness, indicating additional care was needed for their dependents.In addition, 97 patients (64%) reported that another household member supported them for a mean of 4.8 days after leaving hospital.The mean amount of time spent by patients travelling was 1.2 days to seek treatment before plus 1.6 days after leaving the hospital to attend follow-up clinic visits (Supplementary Table 1).Travel days were not included in the total days impacted by the household, as this would duplicate the time spent away from usual activities.Distance from health facility was not collected within the survey. 1 Days away from usual activity was expressed in the survey as "days unable to work (or reduced work) or unable to attend school". 2 Alternative caregiving was expressed in the survey as "did anyone else have to look after your dependents?" 3 Total days impacted is the sum of total days unable to work and total days caregiving.

Household costs of malaria
The mean total household cost per malaria episode was US$137.96(SD=108.05) with a median of $101.57(IQR=$74.75,$161.71)(Table 3).Of this total cost, 41% comprised direct household costs equating to US$56.96 (SD=69.96)per person.The majority of direct costs were related to the hospital admission, although it is unclear whether these costs included direct admission costs or cost associated food and other supplies needed during an admission.Indirect household costs were the most significant contributor to the total cost burden (58%), with a mean total amount of US$80.15 (SD=73.62)for each household.When using self-reported wages (with mean wage imputed for adults who reported time off usual activities but not their income), the mean patient time cost was estimated to be US$56.65 (SD=62.11).The total caregiver time costs (including patients being looked after themselves and when alternative caregiving was needed to look after the patient's dependents) were estimated to be US$23.50(SD=30.01)for each malaria case.Only 3% (4/152) patients reported having "other costs" which were unspecified in the survey.These were <1% of the total costs, all were P. knowlesi cases, and three of these were reported by female patients.

Costs of malaria by population subgroup
Male participants reported a greater average cost of illness with US$141.90 compared to US$126.13 for females; however, this difference was statistically insignificant (Table 4).Cost differences between sexes were primarily attributed to reported wage differences, with 65% The seven severe malaria cases (all P. knowlesi) had 91% higher total costs than non-severe cases (US$253.26versus US$132.39 respectively, p=0.006) (Table 4), predominantly due to substantially higher indirect costs (US$94.33mean difference) for severe malaria (p=0.026).
P. vivax patients presented with the highest total costs at $210.37 (SD=183.76;Table 4).In contrast to other malaria species, most of the P. vivax costs were direct costs (63%) where hospital admission and clinic out-of-pocket costs were double the direct costs of malaria due to other Plasmodium species (

Multivariate analysis of malaria costs
The GLM tested severe malaria, sex, anemia status, human-only malaria status and age against total costs.The GLM showed that when holding all other variables constant, severe malaria has an incremental marginal cost of US$61.71(95% CI= -$20.99 -$144.40)when compared to non-severe malaria (Table 5).Having a human-only type of malaria leads to an increase in marginal cost of $53.08, and an increase in age by one year leads to an increase in marginal costs for each malaria episode of $1.57, when controlling for other factors.This result is consistent with a P. knowlesi only GLM (Supplementary Table 5) where age was the only significant predictor with marginal cost of $1.17 (95% confidence interval $0.19 -$2.15; p=0.02) while being male leads to an increase of $19.79 compared to being a female (Table 5).
Outputs of the GLM are presented in Supplementary Table 6. .

Scenario Analysis
The wage used to estimate productivity losses greatly impacted the total cost per malaria episode.Compared to the base case estimate of US$137.96 per person, the cost per episode decreased to US$114.69 when wage loss estimates were only applied to adults who reported their wages for Scenario 1 (Table 6).When using Sabah estimates from the Malaysia household income survey (US$236 per month) and applied to only adults [28], the total costs increased by 19% to US$163.90.When this wage was applied to the time loss of all patients, the total cost increased to US$188.76, an increase of 37% compared to the base case.Finally, when the household inequities survey for Sabah was utilized (US$411 per month) [29], the total cost increased by 78% (US$245.46)when applied to all adults and 104% (US$281.81)when applied to all patients.Figure 1 shows that females had higher total costs for scenarios where wage estimates were applied evenly to the entire population.The base case uses reported incomes with mean income applied to all adults who did not report income.Scenario

Catastrophic Health Expenditure
When using the mean monthly self-reported income value of US$168, direct health expenditure for a single malaria episode accounted for 27% of monthly income.Eighty percent (122/152) of patients reported direct health costs above 10% of monthly income, indicating catastrophic health expenditure.When using a higher defined threshold for catastrophic health expenditure of 25% of monthly income, the direct costs of a malaria episode reported by 38% (57/152) of patients in this survey remained at levels consistent with catastrophic health expenditure.
When using the Malaysia household income survey data as a higher baseline mean monthly income value of US$236 [28], 62% (94/152) of patients reported health expenditure above 10% of monthly income.This percentage dropped to 24% (36/152) when applying the higher 25% monthly income defined threshold.If considering the mean monthly income from the household inequities survey of US$411 [29], then 39% (59/152) and 12% (18/152) of patients experience catastrophic health expenditure at 10% and 25% monthly income thresholds, respectively.

DISCUSSION
Despite the provision of free health-facility-related costs of malaria care by the Ministry of Economy, Malaysia [38], patients in Sabah faced substantial personal financial barriers when accessing care with a mean cost of $138 for each malaria episode.Malaysia has successfully controlled human-only malaria in recent years, with only small numbers of imported cases of P. vivax and P. falciparum now reported [1].However, transmission of four major Plasmodium species were diagnosed during the period this study was conducted, with the majority being due to local zoonotic P. knowlesi infections.To our knowledge, this is the first study to present .and compare costs for more than two species of human-only malaria and the first to compare costs between zoonotic and non-zoonotic malarias.One of the major findings was that patients with P. vivax infections demonstrated a trend towards higher mean costs of US$210, mainly due to direct medical costs for higher-intensity treatment monitoring [39,40].P. knowlesi had a mean total cost of US$127, primarily comprised of productivity losses.As expected, severe malaria, exclusively due to P. knowlesi infection in this study, was associated with higher costs (US$253) than non-severe disease (US$132), consistent with the available literature for severe P. falciparum infections in African contexts [30,41].Females within this study had higher direct costs than men at $74 as compared to $51, respectively.While the source of this difference was not captured by our survey, the study team suggested that this may be explained by higher spending by females on hygiene products while in hospital.When using the mean reported monthly income from the study, 28% of patients experienced catastrophic health expenditure at a threshold of 25% of monthly income.
The higher cost associated with P. vivax infections compared to other Plasmodium species has a number of potential contributing factors related both to the patient and their care.P. vivax symptomatic infections predominantly occurred in a younger population demographic, with 46% of vivax malaria participants under 15 years, meaning relatively lower productivity costs for the patients and higher costs for their caregiving.The younger age profile of vivax malaria patients may explain the higher direct out-of-pocket medical costs associated with the disease as parents and caregivers of these patients will likely travel, sleep, and eat in the ward alongside the child.Another factor which may contribute to higher costs is caregivers may be more likely to return their child for follow-up clinic services, and P. vivax requires a longer treatment duration of 14 days for the primaquine course, in contrast to other species that do not have dormant liver parasites to treat [21].To our knowledge, no previous studies have shown the cost of P. vivax infections to be higher than P. falciparum infections.
. Compared with infections due to non-zoonotic Plasmodium species, patients diagnosed with P. knowlesi were older and more likely to be male, reflecting the current understanding of transmission occurring among adult males engaged in agricultural activities [12,42].Overall, working-aged males (18-65 years), showed lower total direct medical costs than those of nonworking age.This may be attributed to fewer visiting family members or to employers subsidizing out-of-pocket costs, such as large-scale plantation owners providing free transport.
However, this population also experienced substantial productivity losses; thus, ongoing P.
knowlesi transmission can substantially impact local economies, causing catastrophic spending for individuals and their families, or may prevent patients from seeking care.The higher comparative incidence of zoonotic P. knowlesi cases has been linked with recent deforestation and changes in agricultural land use and economic development [42], including in the Kudat district in northern Sabah, where most study participants resided [43].Rapid changes in land use have created complex environments, including reduced forest cover and biodiversity [12,20], which have altered the interaction and parasite transmission dynamics between humans, mosquito vectors and macaque hosts [12].P. knowlesi transmission is now demonstrated to occur in other locations in Southeast Asian locations [11]; without adequate control measures, the medical costs and indirect productivity losses will continue to place a substantial economic burden on patients and their families.
Factors found on multivariate analysis to remain independently associated with higher total costs were age and having malaria from human-only Plasmodium species (compared to P. knowlesi infection).Both male sex and severe malaria did not remain as independent predictors when controlling for these other features.Understanding the distance travelled by participants to access care and being able to control for this may have been useful in this model.However, these data were not collected within the survey.Without further data, it is challenging to speculate on other factors associated with higher total costs per malaria episode.However, .
when controlling for malaria severity, malaria from human-only Plasmodium species (predominantly influenced by higher P. vivax related costs) was associated with higher total costs (Table 5), which may be reflective of the longer duration of illness with P. vivax and P.
Despite government health services being provided at no charge for malaria patients (e.g.usual hospital admission fee, routine antimalarial medicine costs, laboratory testing), out-of-pocket costs for households still have the potential to impact those experiencing socio-economic disadvantage disproportionally.Whilst this study did not directly capture socioeconomic disadvantage, understanding occupational status and district of residence may provide insight into subpopulations experiencing disadvantage.Irrespective of the method used to estimate wages and the health expenditure threshold chosen, a large proportion of malaria patients exceeded the catastrophic health expenditure threshold for mean direct out-of-pocket costs.It is conceivable that for many lower-income households, dealing with the impact of this type of health expenditure may necessitate either deferring initial or subsequent care.Alternatively, households may deplete savings, take funding for schooling, sell cash crops or animals or incur other forms of significant debt, collectively contributing to a possible long-term detrimental household debt-cycle [1].Many of these factors may be further exacerbated if occurring in conjunction with a limited household savings buffer, including a lack of cash flow for those reliant on subsistence farming, for which selling assets such as land or changing agricultural practices to prioritize growing of higher risk cash crops may therefore further jeopardize future household earning potential or stability [27,44].Households with lower socio-economic status have been found to be at a higher risk of having malaria, [24] indicating the inequitable these households bear.
The scenario analyses showed significant variation in total costs when considering alternative methods to value time losses.The base case scenario imputed the mean self-reported income for adults with no income-reported data.If only evaluating those with self-reported data on productivity losses (Scenario 1), the lower subsequent malaria cost estimates are likely to underestimate lost productivity for subsistence farmers and the informal workforce [45,46].
Since self-reported income may not be the most appropriate method, we also used alternative wage estimates to value these time losses, applying them primarily to all adults and then as a comparator to the whole population (including children).Using separate analyses based on the large robust Malaysian Household Income Survey [28], and health inequities reporting data [29] to provide alternative estimates of the average monthly wage to all adults, the total cost of illness increased by 19% and 78% respectively.Valuation of productivity losses is a highly discussed methodological issue [47], particularly considering income differences between male and female patients and caregivers [48].By using standardized wage estimates, time losses from all patients are considered equal, and the total cost reflects an equity-driven estimate.
Notably, in Scenarios 3 and 5 (when the two alternative wage estimates were uniformly applied to all patients), the total costs were higher for females than males.Valuing children's time using a cost equal to adult wages, while not representative of formal economic output, gives greater insight into the economic cost of time losses due to malaria in children, given that malaria episodes have been shown to be detrimental to children's education [49][50][51].In these scenarios, productivity losses account for 70% and 80% of total costs, respectively, compared to the base case where indirect costs accounted for 58% of total costs.The method by which time losses are valued can greatly alter the interpretation of the total household costs of malaria.
Given the often overlooked value of the informal economy [52], scenarios which value all patients time losses equitably emphasize the true opportunity cost faced by patients and families during a malaria episode.
This study has several limitations.The self-reported costing data was collected 30 days after study enrolment; hence, potentially neglecting the long-term chronic health costs, especially for the low numbers of P. vivax patients who are at risk of relapse infections [53].Costs of other longer-term complications were not included due to feasibility limitations [8] and thus were outside the scope of the analysis; however, these costs may conceivably have a large effect on actual household costs.Additionally, recall bias and study setting may have influenced the actual costs and resources spent by a household related to a single malaria episode [54].Females may also be underrepresented within the sample due to gender-related socio-cultural norms that influence female's treatment-seeking behavior [55].Additionally, no questions were directly asked about total household income, thus if household have multiple income sources they have been missed in catastrophic health expenditure calculation.This study aimed to estimate costs to the households; therefore, costs to the healthcare provider were not included.The inclusion of healthcare provider costs would further increase the total cost per malaria episode.Future studies should aim to quantify costs from a societal perspective to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the economic burden of malaria [56].

CONCLUSION
Given Malaysia's goal of malaria elimination, understanding the magnitude of household outof-pocket costs and productivity losses is essential to inform policy and guide novel interventions.To our knowledge, this is the first study exploring household costs of malaria in Malaysia and the first to quantify the economic burden of P. knowlesi malaria episodes on households.This information is crucial to the East Malaysian states of Sabah and likely neighboring Sarawak, which collectively report the majority of P. knowlesi cases nationally and for which costs of P. knowlesi are poorly understood.Our research also highlights the opportunity cost of not developing novel public health interventions to control P. knowlesi transmission.Patients face a substantial financial burden for each episode of malaria, even when health-facility based clinical management is otherwise provided free of charge.These costs can disproportionately impact low socio-economic households that rely on subsistence farming and agricultural-related income, with potentially catastrophic economic impacts if ignored.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Scenario analysis of methods for estimating the mean indirect costs and associated impact on the total cost per malaria episode by sex in 2022 United States dollars (n=152).

Table 1 : Demographic and disease characteristics of study population (n = 152).
* Hemoglobin data needed to calculate anemia were missing from one patient.

Table 2 : Mean (standard deviation) number of days away from usual activity per patient and their household due to an episode of malaria (N=152).
All severe cases in the study were due to Plasmodium knowlesi.

Table 3 : Total mean and median household costs for a single malaria episode in 2022 USD (n=152). Mean Standard deviation Percent of total cost Median Interquartile range
All costs are inflated to year 2022 equivalent United States dollar amounts.Results are presented in Malaysian Ringgits in Supplementary Table 2.
1Other costs were unspecified in the questionnaire; no details about the nature of these costs were provided by the participants.

Table 4 . Total mean household costs and standard deviations (SD) for a malaria episode by sex, species, and malaria severity in 2022 United States dollars (n=152).
(25/38)of females not reporting their wage losses.This group predominantly consisted of females identifying as houseworkers with no formal paid employment (13/38) or students under 16 years (10/38).Despite higher overall cost for men, females had 45% higher direct costs of US$74.26 compared to US$51.19 for men (p=0.018),attributed to higher hospital and 38)nic costs (Supplementary Table3).Costs were also compared between working-age males (16-65 years old, which comprised 54% of the total participants) and the remainder of those enrolled.The total cost for working-age males was higher than the remainder of the participants, with a mean of US$144.01 (SD=105.19)versusUS$110.22 (SD=92.38)respectively(p=0.007;Supplementary Table4).While direct costs were similar between working-age males and the rest of the population, working-age males reported higher indirect costs at US$94.13, compared to US$52.78 for others (p=0.000).

Table 5 : Marginal costs, standard errors, and 95% confidence intervals of factors associated with variability with total household costs from the Generalized Linear Model that included all patients.
All costs are in 2022 United States dollars.