Drivers of inappropriate use of antimicrobials in South Asia: A systematic review of qualitative literature

Antimicrobial resistance is a global public health crisis. Effective antimicrobial stewardship requires an understanding of the factors and context that contribute to inappropriate use of antimicrobials. The goal of this qualitative systematic review was to synthesize themes across levels of the social ecological framework that drive inappropriate use of antimicrobials in South Asia. In September 2023, we conducted a systematic search using the electronic databases PubMed and Embase. Search terms, identified a priori, were related to research methods, topic, and geographic location. We identified 165 articles from the initial search and 8 upon reference review (n=173); after removing duplicates and preprints (n=12) and excluding those that did not meet eligibility criteria (n=115), 46 articles were included in the review. We assessed methodological quality using the qualitative Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist. The studies represented 6 countries in South Asia, and included data from patients, health care providers, community members, and policy makers. For each manuscript, we wrote a summary memo to extract the factors that impede antimicrobial stewardship. We coded memos using NVivo software; codes were organized by levels of the social ecological framework. Barriers were identified at multiple levels including the patient (self-treatment with antimicrobials; perceived value of antimicrobials), the provider (antimicrobials as a universal therapy; gaps in knowledge and skills; financial or reputational incentives), the clinical setting (lack of resources; poor regulation of the facility), the community (access to formal health care; informal drug vendors; social norms), and policy (absence of a regulatory framework; poor implementation of existing policies). The findings highlight the importance of working across multiple sectors to design and implement approaches to antimicrobial stewardship in South Asia.


Introduction
The World Health Organization has identified antimicrobial resistance (AMR), the emergence and spread of pathogens resistant to antimicrobial agents, as one of the top ten global public health threats facing humanity (1). AMR is driven largely by misuse and overuse of antimicrobial agents within both the medical and agricultural sectors, which has increased over the last two decades (2). AMR threatens the efficacy of commonly used clinical antimicrobial agents, posing significant threats to human health. Infections associated with antimicrobial resistant bacteria, as opposed to a non-resistant form, confers two times the risk of a serious health outcome and three times the risk of mortality (3). It is estimated that in 2019 AMR directly resulted in 1.2 million deaths and was a contributing factor in almost 5 million additional deaths worldwide (4). If effective action to curb AMR development is not taken, it is estimated that by 2050, antimicrobial resistant diseases could result in 10 million deaths annually across the globe (5).
South Asia has seen a rapid increase in access to and use of antimicrobials, accompanied by a rise in AMR (6). Health services in many South Asian countries are fragmented and rely on an uncoordinated mix of private and public services. These fragmented health systems provide a space in which inappropriate antimicrobial use can go unchecked and AMR flourishes (7). The impact of AMR on human health in South Asia is profound. In India, nearly 60,000 newborns die each year as a direct result of AMR neonatal infections (8). A 2021 study found that Bangladeshi children with bacteremia resistant to all first-and second-line treatments had an increased risk of death compared to those with susceptible bacteria (9).
Antimicrobial stewardship is a holistic approach to facilitating responsible use and protection of antimicrobial agents through the combined efforts of individuals, organizations, institutions, and policies (10). The goal of stewardship is to reduce AMR and improve patient outcomes by ensuring that antimicrobials are used only when necessary, that appropriate antimicrobials are chosen considering the risk of AMR, and that antimicrobials are used for the minimal duration necessary to treat infection (11). Antimicrobial stewardship programs typically focus on efforts in the health care system that promote the appropriate use of antimicrobials within a facility (12). However, the World Health Organization acknowledges that particularly in low-and middle-income country settings, antimicrobial stewardship requires the participation and buy-in of both formal and informal health care providers, community members, and patients (13). Reducing the inappropriate use of antimicrobials requires a change in human thought and behavior (14); therefore, interventions to promote antimicrobial stewardship need to be informed by the behavioral, social, cultural, and structural factors that shape how people use antimicrobials (15). Understanding the multi-level factors that contribute to inappropriate use of antimicrobials is a key step in designing strategies to combat AMR.
Qualitative methods (e.g. interviews, ethnography, focus groups) are well-suited to generate knowledge about the social determinants of antimicrobial overuse and the context in which AMR flourishes (16). Qualitative data contain in-depth insight elicited from research subjects in their own words, offering novel understanding of the actionable drivers of antimicrobial misuse. Systematic reviews of qualitative research are valuable in synthesizing across studies to identify commonalities across studies that can efficiently inform the design and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (17). In this review paper, we aimed to synthesize themes across levels of the social ecological framework that drive inappropriate use of antimicrobials in South Asia. These findings can help identify areas for future research and intervention to prevent and mitigate AMR in South Asia.

Materials and methods
Overview . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.28.23296313 doi: medRxiv preprint We conducted a systematic review of the literature and used thematic synthesis (18) to integrate findings across qualitative studies. In conducting this review, we adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (19), with attention to the unique requirements for reporting qualitative research as outlined in the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement (20).
Studies were eligible to be included in the systematic review if they met the following criteria: 1) English language research paper in a peer-reviewed journal, 2) used qualitative methods (including in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, or ethnographic observations), 3) reported qualitative themes related to factors driving inappropriate use of antimicrobials, or factors impeding antimicrobial stewardship, 4) reported data related to the human consumption of antimicrobials, and 5) reported data collected in South Asia (defined by the World Bank as Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka) (21). Systematic reviews, opinion pieces, and editorials were excluded.

Search strategy and selection criteria
In September 2023, we conducted a systematic search of the electronic databases PubMed and Embase. We identified search terms related to research method, topic, and location (Table 1). Search results from both databases were downloaded to Zotero for review.
After eliminating duplicates, we reviewed abstracts to eliminate papers that did not meet the inclusion criteria. The full texts of all remaining papers were then reviewed to confirm that they met inclusion criteria. The reference lists of included papers were reviewed to identify any additional papers that missed in our search.
[ INSERT TABLE 1 HERE] . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.28.23296313 doi: medRxiv preprint

Critical appraisal
To assess the quality of the included studies, two individuals evaluated each paper using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) for qualitative studies (22), and resolved any discrepancies by consensus. Following our CASP review, all studies met quality criteria of research objective, appropriate qualitative methodology, research design, recruitment strategy, and data collection methods.

Data extraction and synthesis
We created a memo template to extract the themes reported in each study. The memos included information about the study, and a description of major themes that were reported across the levels of the social ecological framework (23). The social ecological framework was chosen as an organizing framework to facilitate identification and organization of barriers across different levels of influence. Each memo was reviewed by a second analyst for review and verification of the capture of findings from the original paper. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The memos were uploaded into NVivo (version 12 Pro) qualitative data analysis software. Applied thematic analysis (24) was used to identify common themes across studies. We created a coding structure that included the levels of social ecological framework as the codes, and emerging themes under each level as the sub-codes. Two individuals dually coded all memos and met periodically to review and reconcile emerging codes. Discrepancies in coding were resolved by JM and MHW. After all memos were coded, the first author (JM) and last author (MHW) met to . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.28.23296313 doi: medRxiv preprint review the coding structure, to merge and split codes as needed. Coding reports were analyzed, with reference to the source material as needed to synthesize and contextualize the findings.

Included studies
The search and selection processes are summarized in Figure 1. The initial literature search yielded 165 results, and 8 additional publications were included upon reference review throughout the process for a total of 173 papers considered. After removing 11 duplicates and 1 preprint, 161 publications underwent abstract review, then 50 to full-text review. 46 publications were included in the final analysis (25-70), with publication dates ranging from 2010 to 2023. The papers represent 6 of the 8 South Asian countries of interest. India had the highest study representation (n=20), followed by Pakistan (n=12), Bangladesh (n=8), Nepal (n=4), then Bhutan and Sri Lanka (n=1 each). No studies were identified from the Maldives or Afghanistan.
The studies used a wide variety of qualitative methodologies, the most common being individual interviews (n=37) and focus group discussions (n=13). Human subjects included patients, physicians (working in various specialties and sectors), nurses, pharmacists, community members (urban and rural, with various socioeconomic status), caregivers, government employees, national policy advisors, pharmaceutical industry staff, staff of nongovernmental . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.28.23296313 doi: medRxiv preprint healthcare organizations, international policy body representatives, students and faculty, drug vendors, and informal healthcare providers.
Data extraction and synthesis revealed themes at each level of the social ecological framework (Figure 2). Table 4

Individual level: Patients and their caregivers
Two major themes emerged at the individual level, representing the experiences and circumstances of patients and their caregivers: self-treatment with antimicrobials, and the perceived value of antimicrobials. Multiple studies reported that patients self-treat with antimicrobials due to multiple barriers, with socioeconomic status cited most frequently (27,28,30,45,48,53,70). For example, patients living in rural villages may not have adequate funds to travel to formal health care facilities and obtain diagnostic testing and prescriptions (26,37,51). Additionally, it was noted that patients and caregivers may be hesitant to seek medical care when they have "minor ailments," due to the increased practice of referring out to specialized physicians which costs more money, additional time, and travel (71)(72)(73). Limited access to the formal health care system often leads patients to self-treat with antimicrobials when presenting with a wide variety of symptoms including diarrhea, stomach pain, cough, and fever by rationing antimicrobials (74-77). A patient's decision to self-treat is informed by the perception that antimicrobials work based on prior therapeutic success with antimicrobials in themselves, family, or friends. Antimicrobials for self-treatment are obtained by receiving medication from a friend or family member, using leftover medication, or directly obtaining medication without a prescription from a pharmacy (65,74,75,78).
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.28.23296313 doi: medRxiv preprint A number of studies reported the perception held by patients that the receipt of an antimicrobial prescription indicates high quality medical care, as antimicrobials are perceived as offering an objective and rapid solution to their illnesses (75,77,79,80). Overall, antimicrobials are perceived as powerful drugs that provide a quick solution to a range of ailments (81).
Studies attribute this attitude to a lack of knowledge not only surrounding antimicrobial resistance, but more generally around medicine, diagnostics, and treatments (28,79,82-85).
Additionally, caregivers report feeling a sense of emotional relief receiving an antimicrobial prescription because they believe it will successfully treat their children, elders, and other vulnerable groups (81,86). The high value placed on antimicrobials and belief in their power leads patients to expect and even demand antimicrobials when seeking medical care (87)(88)(89).
Patients will "doctor shop" or seek care only from providers who are known to readily provide antimicrobials or pharmacies that are liberal with their distribution (65,(90)(91)(92).

Interpersonal level: Formal health care workers
Three major themes emerged at the interpersonal level, representing formal health care workers: antimicrobials as a universal therapy, gaps in knowledge and skills, and financial or reputational incentives. In multiple studies, participants spoke about how antimicrobials provide a cheap and accessible treatment plan for a wide variety of medical conditions, particularly in the absence of diagnostic and treatment options (71,82,90). Clinician participants described that it is common practice for providers to prescribe antimicrobials when they are unsure of a patient's medical diagnosis, waiting for laboratory testing results, or even as a preventative measure to reduce the occurrence of secondary infections (71,89,93). Dispensing antimicrobials based on prior therapeutic success was described as an appropriate treatment for patients presenting with similar symptoms (82,89). Therefore, in many countries broad-spectrum antimicrobials was perceived as universal therapy for any general illness in conjunction with other common medications such as ibuprofen or acetaminophen (71,72,77,82,89). Some . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.28.23296313 doi: medRxiv preprint providers directly handed medications to patients without writing a prescription or providing the medication name (77).
Many health care workers reported lacking knowledge surrounding antimicrobial stewardship and appropriate prescribing practices. Multiple studies with clinicians and students noted a lack of awareness of existing antimicrobial stewardship programs in their facilities, and an absence of training curricula on appropriate use of antimicrobials (94,95). Among clinicians with some understanding of antimicrobial resistance and/or stewardship programs, many held misconceptions or denied the severity of the problem (89,96). Others believed that specific medical specialties (e.g., surgery) or individuals in leadership (e.g., chief physicians) should be responsible for taking action and managing antimicrobial distribution in their own teams and departments (97,98).
Clinicians described the pressures they faced to dispense antibiotics to their patients.
They noted that patients associated the dispensing of medications with a high level of care, leading them to dispense antimicrobials in hopes of increasing business and patient satisfaction (28,77,90). Business success is dependent on positive community reviews and reputation, leading clinicians to prioritize patient demands over clinical guidelines, especially with wealthy or influential patients (28,99). It was reported that pharmaceutical companies also play a role by providing financial incentives to providers for prescribing high volumes of certain antimicrobials and other medications (28,69,87,90,99-101).

Facility level: Clinical settings
Two major themes emerged at the facility level, representing formal health care facilities: lack of resources, and poor regulation of the facility. Multiple studies reported a widespread shortage of medical infrastructure, equipment, and personnel across diverse settings, resulting in poor access to laboratory testing and diagnostics. In urban settings, there is a shortage of . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; hospital personnel paired with a high volume of patients, leading to the prescription of common antimicrobial regimens without in-depth assessment of patients or laboratory testing (82,88,95,99,102,103). Additionally, physicians are often unavailable or there are long wait times, prompting individuals to obtain antimicrobials on their own rather than access these formal facilities (28, 66,77,84). Multiple studies also reported that in rural areas, treatment and testing facilities are lacking altogether, requiring patients to travel long distances to reach health facilities. As a response to these resource shortages in the formal health care system, informal

Community level: Community practices and social norms
Three major themes emerged at the community level: access to formal healthcare, informal drug vendors, and social norms. Studies described a multitude of systemic barriers to accessing the formal health care system, including rural areas with limited infrastructure, long wait times, poor quality of care, an inability to pay for services, or the complexity of navigating health systems (73,74,87). Instead of accessing formal care, many patients reported that they . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.28.23296313 doi: medRxiv preprint instead relied on informal drug vendors who ran small drug stores that provided consultations and dispensed medications (65,72,74,75). These informal drug vendors report being commercially driven to sell medications and reach sales targets, often resulting in an over prescription of antimicrobials, inaccurate dosing, and the distribution of "half" antimicrobials which may be mixed with other materials (e.g., caffeine, routine pain medications) (28,74,85). In a study of informal healthcare providers in rural India, Khare et al. explained how informal drug vendors are an essential resource for rural and medically underserved communities, where antimicrobials are often handed out in response to a verbal description of symptoms or patient demand based on prior treatment success (91). The authors noted that without informal drug vendors, these patients would likely forego healthcare entirely.
Social norms surrounding the use of antimicrobials also emerged as a significant factor promoting inappropriate use. The sharing of antimicrobials between family and friends is a socially accepted and rooted practice in many South Asian settings (74). Additionally, individuals will often trade medical advice with their social networks and encourage others to obtain specific antimicrobials that treated their own symptoms in the past (86). In Bangladesh, Lucas et al. explained that women will typically ask their husbands for diagnostic or treatment advice rather than visiting a formal physician (73). Community norms related to antimicrobial use drive dispensing patterns. As mentioned at the interpersonal level, over-prescription of antimicrobials is common to retain patients and provide the perception of high-quality care that is associated with antimicrobials (28,102).

Policy level: Governance and legislation
Two major themes emerged at the policy level: absence of a regulatory framework to monitor and control antimicrobials, and poor implementation of existing policies of antimicrobial stewardship. Studies across various countries noted that national, state, and local governments, and their policy infrastructures, were ultimately responsible for antimicrobial stewardship . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ;

programs (ASPs) in clinical settings. In a study of ASP development and implementation in
India, Charani et al. (2019) conducted interviews with clinical providers in India and noted a lack of national infrastructure to legislate and control access to antimicrobials; strong local leadership and championing was necessary to make up for this shortcoming and create successful ASPs (98). Similar concerns about regulation and surveillance were identified in Pakistan among physicians (50) and pharmacists (65). The study by Hayat et al (2019) indicated several barriers in ASP implementation in hospitals, which could be overcome if the government were to provide necessary support, including legislation and funding (50). Other studies noted that even in countries with existing government regulation and legislation, it is difficult to navigate, understand, and consistently enforce these policies in clinical settings (67,69,70). In a study of policymakers and clinicians in Bhutan and Nepal, Maki et al. 2020 described policies related to prescription-only sales of antimicrobials, but a lack of enforcement in both the clinical and community settings (95).

Discussion
We report the results of a qualitative systematic review of studies conducted in South Asian countries to examine the factors that drive inappropriate use of antimicrobials. Through the synthesis of findings reported in 46 qualitative studies, we identified multiple factors across five levels of the social ecological framework: the individual patient, the formal provider, the clinical setting, the community, and policy. Drivers of inappropriate use of antimicrobials were evident at all levels, highlighting the importance of working across multiple levels and sectors to address drivers of antimicrobial misuse and build commitment for stewardship in South Asia.
These findings align with other systematic reviews and analyses of both qualitative and quantitative research on antimicrobial resistance and stewardship efforts around the world . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.28.23296313 doi: medRxiv preprint (104)(105)(106), emphasizing the need for coordinated global action in addition to region-specific solutions.
The heterogeneity of South Asian healthcare systems presents significant barriers to antimicrobial stewardship. The studies in our analysis described regional differences in facility sizes and accessibility, administration involvement, government influence, licensure and formal education requirements of healthcare workers, pharmacy policies, and drug regulation programs. Further research is needed to assess these factors in countries that were under- intervention. Compared to studies in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, the utilization of informal drug dispensers and unregulated community pharmacies is much more prevalent in South Asia (104,107). Therefore, it is essential for antimicrobial stewardship efforts in South Asia to target both formal and informal healthcare workers.
Both formal prescribers and informal drug dispensers face immense social and financial pressures from patients and pharmaceutical companies to liberally supply antimicrobials despite knowing about AMR and the resulting health consequences. Our data suggest that it is normative in many hospitals and clinics to order antimicrobials as a universal therapy to cover a variety of potential illnesses, appease patients, and generate pharmaceutical revenue. Shifting norms that are so embedded in the healthcare industry will require a multifaceted, longitudinal approach that encourages provider behavioral change. Potential solutions may include investing in the workforce to remove profit incentive of dispensing drugs, implementation of a regulatory framework to control antimicrobial prescribing in both public and private facilities, and required educational curriculum specific to antimicrobial stewardship in early stages of medical training to . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; facilitate a sense of ownership and responsibility as providers. Community pharmacies and informal drug dispensers should also be formally regulated to control the use of antimicrobials, though alternative opportunities for business revenue must be identified to encourage meaningful and sustainable change.
Patient expectations and demands were universally identified as a significant driver of inappropriate antimicrobial use. This is primarily driven by a larger systemic issue of healthcare inaccessibility, pushing individuals to demand antimicrobials during limited provider visits or seeking them in their communities and social networks instead. To effectively shift this cultural norm, increasing accessibility to care must be prioritized, especially in low-income and geographically isolated communities. Efforts might include investing in public transportation that extends to rural areas and villages, investing in education at all levels, and recruiting medical workers from underrepresented regions who are likely to return to those communities to practice. Existing facilities should expand to formally integrate laboratory testing and diagnostic equipment and should prioritize quality improvement to better serve patients. Additionally, public health campaigns and community health workers can better educate the general public on infection prevention and the negative impacts of antimicrobial overuse as has successfully been done in the Indian state of Kerala (108).
Our data suggested a dearth of policies addressing antimicrobial stewardship, and poor enforcement of existing policies. Interventions might include adopting a national antimicrobial monitoring system, requiring consults with pharmacists who have antimicrobial stewardshipspecific expertise, providing financial incentives for infection prevention and reduced antimicrobial prescribing, or developing and requiring a national, standardized educational training for all antimicrobial dispensers (109)(110)(111)(112). Policy reform and legislation alone are not sufficient to facilitate widespread antimicrobial stewardship nor combat resistance; it is also necessary to change individual behaviors and the embedded cultural norms that encourage . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.28.23296313 doi: medRxiv preprint them. There are multiple public health programs that facilitate social and behavioral change at the individual, family, and community level (113). For example, water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) activities are administered by local, regional, national, and international groups and are even embedded in national education curricula in China, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Nicaragua, and Sudan (114). These efforts are successful due to a massive global coordination and multi-sector participation in WASH activities. Similar efforts must be made for antimicrobial stewardship to address the global health threat of antimicrobial resistance and its devastating health effects.
It's important to note some limitations of the study. First, this review focused on overuse and misuse of antimicrobials in human populations, and did not include other significant drivers of AMR, such as antimicrobial use in livestock (115), environmental changes (116), and water and sanitation systems (117,118). A review of AMR in South Asia in a One Health framework

Conclusions
Antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to individual and population health in South Asia. As common antimicrobials become less efficacious due to antimicrobial-resistant organisms, there is a risk of significant increases in morbidity and mortality in the region. In . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.28.23296313 doi: medRxiv preprint synthesizing the qualitative literature in South Africa, we identified a range of norms, behaviors, and policy contexts that contribute to antimicrobial resistance in South Asia. The findings point to a need for a multi-pronged approach that works across sectors to improve the surveillance and reporting of antimicrobial use and implement stewardship interventions specific to the unique regions.

Registration and protocol
The protocol for the systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023456791).  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted September 29, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.28.23296313 doi: medRxiv preprint

Khan M 2020
Is enhancing the professionalism of healthcare providers critical to tackling antimicrobial resistance in low-and middle-income countries?
To investigate whether weaknesses in health care providers' professionalism result in boundaries between "qualified" and "unqualified" providers being blurred, and how these weaknesses impact inappropriate provision of antibiotics in LMICs To explore the drivers of antibiotic use among formal /informal healthcare providers and patients accessing care at primary health centers India 28 individual interviews with allopathic doctors, informal health providers, nurses, pharmacy shopkeepers, and patients

Nair M 2023
Perceptions of effective policy interventions and strategies to address antibiotic misuse within primary healthcare in India: A qualitative study To assess perceptions of interventions and gaps in policy and practice with respect to outpatient antibiotic misuse in India India 23 individual interviews with individuals in academia, nongovernment organizations, policy, advocacy, pharmacy, and medicine

Pearson M 2019
Knowing antimicrobial resistance in practice: a multi-country qualitative study with human and animal healthcare professionals To investigate AMR awareness among human/animal healthcare professionals and the contextual issues influencing the relationship between awareness and India (multisite) Individual interviews and rapid ethnographic observation with healthcare professionals practices of antimicrobial prescribing and dispensing

Rofle R 2021
Barriers to implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in three low and middle-income country tertiary care settings: findings from a multi-site qualitative study To determine perceived barriers to the development and implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs in tertiary care centers in three LIMCs Sri Lanka (multi-site) Individual interviews with 22 physicians at tertiary care hospitals

Sahoo K 2010
Antibiotic use, resistance development and environmental factors: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in Orissa, India To explore physician, veterinarian, and drug dispenser opinions about antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance development in relation to environmental factors India Individual interviews with 24 physicians, veterinarians, and drug dispensers in Orissa

Saleem Z 2019
Antimicrobial prescribing and determinants of antimicrobial resistance: a qualitative study among physicians in Pakistan To assess physician perception about antibiotic use and resistance, and factors influencing their prescribing of antibiotics and potential interventions to improve their future antibiotic prescribing

Self-treatment with antimicrobials
Patients forego formal health care and obtain antimicrobials through various means (e.g., purchasing antimicrobials without a prescription, using leftover antimicrobials, taking family and friends' prescriptions)

Perceived value of antimicrobials
Patients believe that usage of antimicrobials will cure them and alleviate their symptoms quickly. Antimicrobials are viewed as a universally effective drug for all symptoms/illnesses and are actively requested in clinical consultations.

Antimicrobials as a universal therapy
Physicians inappropriately recommend antimicrobial therapy to patients as a first step in treatment, often in the absence of diagnostics.

Gaps in knowledge and skills
Many providers lack training or knowledge of antimicrobial stewardship. Those who do have knowledge of these issues may not translate these ideas into clinical practice.

Financial or reputational incentives
Providers are likely to prescribe antimicrobials to receive financial incentive from pharmaceutical companies or retain patients by maintaining a reputation of being willing to prescribe antimicrobials.

Lack of resources
Lack of resources within facilities (e.g. space, time, providers, knowledge of programs, infrastructure, funding, etc.) that undermines quality care and leads to overuse of antimicrobials.

Facility: Clinical settings
Poor regulation of facility Facility procedures are not properly implemented or regulated. (e.g., drug reporting procedures, management of medication, pluralistic health care services, organization of the healthcare facility, etc.)

Access to formal healthcare
Structural barriers prevent patients accessing formal health care in their communities. In contrast, informal providers are perceived as relatively easy, timely, and cost-effective, and readily provide antimicrobials.

Informal drug vendors
Pharmacies, medical shops, and informal health care providers in the wider community provide antimicrobials to patients without requiring lab testing, office visits, formal prescriptions, etc.

Social norms
The use and sharing of antimicrobials are widely accepted as a normal and common practice.

Poor implementation and regulation
Existing policies are poorly implemented or not regulated by the government.

Absence of a regulatory framework
Lack of policy and implementation frameworks addressing proper antimicrobial use, stewardship, and prescribing practices.