Association of Marital/Partner Status with Hospital Readmission Among Young Adults With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Introduction: Despite evidence supporting the benefits of marriage on cardiovascular health, the impact of marital/partner status on the long-term readmission of young acute myocardial infarction (AMI) survivors is less clear. We aimed to examine the association between marital/partner status and 1-year all-cause readmission, and explore sex differences, among young AMI survivors. Methods: Data were from the VIRGO study (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients), which enrolled young adults aged 18–55 years with AMI (2008–2012). The primary end point was all-cause readmission within 1 year of hospital discharge, obtained from medical record, patient interviews, and adjudicated by a physician panel. We performed Cox proportional hazards models with sequential adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, clinical and psychosocial factors. Sex-marital/partner status interaction was also tested. Results: Of the 2,979 adults with AMI (2002 women [67.2%]; mean age 48 [interquartile range, 44–52] years), unpartnered individuals were more likely to experience all-cause readmissions compared with married/partnered individuals within the first year after hospital discharge (34.6% versus 27.2%, hazard ratio [HR]=1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–1.49). The association attenuated but remained significant after adjustment for demographic and socioeconomic factors (adjusted HR, 1.16; 95%CI, 1.01–1.34), and was not significant after further adjusting for clinical factors and psychosocial factors (adjusted HR, 1.10; 95%CI, 0.94–1.28). Sex-marital/partner status interaction was not significant (p=0.69). Sensitivity analysis using data with multiple imputation, and restricting outcomes to cardiac readmission yielded comparable results. Conclusions: In a cohort of young adults aged 18–55 years, unpartnered status was associated with 1.3-fold increased risk of all-cause readmission within 1 year of AMI discharge. Further adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, clinical and psychosocial factors attenuated the association, suggesting that these factors may explain disparities in readmission between married/partnered versus unpartnered young adults. Whereas young women experienced more readmission compared to similar-aged men, the association between marital/partner status and 1-year readmission did not vary by sex.


82
Despite an overall reduction in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence and acute 83 myocardial infarction (AMI) mortality,(1) rates of AMI hospitalization in young adults (≤55

94
Marriage has long been known to offer cardiovascular health benefits, including its 95 association with lower risk of AMI incidence,(6) in-hospital and long-term mortality,(7-10) 96 and recurrent events.(11-13) Committed relationships that are not based on formal legal 97 unions, such as domestic partners and common-law marriages may also convey benefits, but 98 are less commonly described in prior studies.(7,9,10,12) Moreover, prior research has largely 99 focused on older populations, been conducted in foreign countries, and has not explored 100 readmission beyond the first month of discharge.(11,12) There is a paucity of data on the 101 impact of marital/partner status on the long-term readmission outcomes of younger AMI 102 patients. In addition, although evidence suggest that women may not benefit from marriage to 103 the same extent as men regarding mortality outcomes(14,15), less is known about whether 104 there are sex differences in the degree of "protection" conferred by marriage/partnership in a 105 younger population with AMI and as assessed by hospital readmission.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 27, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.20.23291664 doi: medRxiv preprint 106 To address this gap in knowledge, we examined the association between 107 marital/partner status and all-cause and cardiac readmission within 1 year of hospital 108 discharge among a cohort of AMI survivors 18-55 years of age in the United States. A 109 secondary aim was to explore potential subgroup differences in the association by sex. Baseline data were collected by medical chart abstraction and standardized in-person 137 interviews administered by trained personnel during the index AMI admission.
138 Marital/Partner status was collected during patient enrollment interview through a question of 139 "Which best describes your current marital status" and was categorized into 140 "married/partnered" (having a response of "married" or "living as married/living with 141 partner" or "unpartnered" (having a response of "divorced", "separated", "widowed", or 142 "single"). In a secondary analysis, "unpartnered" status was further classified into 143 "divorced/separated", "widowed", or "single". is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 27, 2023.  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 27, 2023.

223
In multivariable analyses, compared with being married/partnered, being unpartnered 224 was associated with a 24% higher risk of all-cause readmission after adjustment for

246
In the fully adjusted model, the two-way interaction between marital/partner status 247 and sex was not significant (p=0.628). To provide additional information on the direction of 248 the interaction, the fully adjusted models were also stratified by sex. Details of the sex-249 specific models output can be found in eTable 2 in the Supplement.

250
Sensitivity analysis using data with multiple imputation, and restricting outcomes to 251 cardiac readmission yielded comparable results (eTable 1 and eTable 3 in the Supplement).

252
In the fully adjusted model with imputed data, no health insurance was also associated with 253 all-cause readmission. When restricting outcomes to cardiac readmission using the Fine-Gray 254 model, financial strain and depression were no longer significant in the fully adjusted model.

255
In a secondary analysis further classifying unpartnered participants into 256 divorces/separated, widowed, and single subgroups, similar pattern was found among 257 divorced/separated individuals as compared to the overall unpartnered group; widowed 258 individuals had the highest risk of all-cause readmission, yet the association was not 259 statistically significant due to the small size of widowed participants in current study; no 260 association was found among single individuals. (Table 3) 261 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 27, 2023.  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

(which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 27, 2023. is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

378
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 27, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.20.23291664 doi: medRxiv preprint