A cross-sectional survey examining the association of clinician characteristics with perceived changes in cervical cancer screening and colposcopy practice during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background : The COVID-19 pandemic led to reductions in cervical cancer screening and colposcopy. Therefore, in this mixed method study we explored perceived pandemic-related practice changes to cervical cancer screenings and colposcopies. Methods : In 2021, a national sample of 1,251 clinicians completed surveys, including 675 clinicians who performed colposcopy; a subset (n=55) of clinicians completed qualitative interviews. Results: Nearly half of all clinicians reported they were currently performing fewer cervical cancer screenings (47%) and colposcopies (44% of those who perform the procedure) than before the pandemic. About one-fifth (18.6%) of colposcopists reported performing fewer LEEPs than prior to the pandemic. Binomial regression analyses indicated that older, non-White, internal medicine and family medicine clinicians (compared to OB-GYNs), and those practicing in community health centers (compared to private practice) had higher odds of reporting reduced screening. Among colposcopists, males, internal medicine physicians, those practicing in community health centers, and in the South had higher odds of reporting reduced colposcopies. Qualitative interviews highlighted pandemic-related care disruptions and lack of tracking systems to identify overdue screenings. Conclusions : Reductions in cervical cancer screening and colposcopy among nearly half of clinicians more than one year into the pandemic raise concerns that inadequate screening and follow-up will lead to future increases in preventable cancers. Funding : This study was funded by the American Cancer Society, who had no role in the study’s design, conduct, or reporting.


Introduction
Cervical cancer prevention programs have been among the most successful cancer prevention programs to date. 1 In the past decade, the addition of routine Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing to screening programs has allowed safe extension of screening intervals through greater reassurance against subsequent cancer development among patients with negative results, and also led to more precise management of patients with abnormal results. 2,3,4However, longer screening intervals may lead to underscreening if patients are not recalled on schedule, and patients with high-risk medical conditions or prior abnormal screening histories need more frequent testing.The Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted the ability to perform routine cancer screenings, which may threaten progress made to date at reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality. 57][8][9] Nationwide, cervical cancer screening rates fell rapidly in 2020 compared with previous years. 10,11Limited evidence also suggests that colposcopy procedures were impacted during this time, though US data are lacking. 12,13As the pandemic has progressed, cancer screening rates have begun to rebound, 6,14 but considerable challenges are still present.
Initially patient fear and closed clinics affected ability to perform cervical cancer screening and colposcopy. 15rrently, lower screening rates continue due to high turnover and medical staff shortages, as well as longer wait times for scheduling appointments due to backlogs. 5,9,15Few studies have explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinician perceptions of cervical cancer screening 16 and colposcopy rates compared with prior to the pandemic.This paper examines the quantitative association of clinician characteristics with perceived changes in screening and colposcopy during the pandemic period.Additionally, through qualitative interviews, we explored how clinicians experienced pandemic-related changes in screening and colposcopy.

Participant recruitment
Participant recruitment is detailed elsewhere (under review).Briefly, clinicians were eligible to participate if they were: 1) a physician or advanced practice provider (APP) [nurse practitioner (NP), physician assistant (PA), or certified nurse midwife (CNM)] practicing in internal medicine, family medicine, obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), or women's health; and 2) performed cervical cancer screening.Between March and August 2021, we recruited clinicians from: the National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health (NPWH) email listserv, a health care physician panel representing a variety of specialties via Dynata (an online market research firm), and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) mailing list.
Nurse practitioners were recruited via email blasts to NPWH listserv members (~N=2,500; ~20% response rate).ASCCP members were recruited via an external mail house using a protocol based on Dillman's Total Design Method (N= 1,000; 21.8% response rate). 17An additional ~250 OB/GYNs and ~250 Internal Medicine and Family Medicine physicians were recruited using Dynata (response rate not available).All participants were compensated.Study participants from all three sources who completed the quantitative survey were asked if they would be willing to participate in phase two of the study that included a qualitative interview.A random sample of those who indicated willingness were later contacted for participation.

Survey content and study variables
As previously described (under review), survey questions were based on Cabana's Guideline Based Practice Improvement Framework 18 and previous research by study co-investigators. 19,20An expert panel (n=10), including physicians and advanced practice providers from multiple specialties reviewed the survey, and the survey was refined based on their feedback.Finally, the survey was piloted with target clinicians (N=27), revised, finalized, and distributed between March and August 2021.The survey covered several areas related to cervical cancer screening and management of abnormal results.This manuscript focuses on items related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on screening and follow-up.

Clinician and Practice Characteristics
Age was measured in years and grouped into four categories.Gender identity was assessed as male, female, transgender, and other.Race was categorized as 1) Asian 2) Black/African American 3) White, and 4) Mixed race, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaska Native, Other.Ethnicity was identified as Hispanic/Latinx or non-Hispanic/Latinx.For all variables that allowed write-in/free responses, we individually examined responses to determine if they could be accurately re-classified within the pre-determined categories for each variable.
Medical training was assessed as physician (MD, DO) or advanced practice provider (APP).Medical specialties were OB/GYN, family medicine, and internal medicine for physicians, and women's health for APPs only.We combined Training and Specialty variables to create one Clinician Type variable with four groups: OB/GYN physicians, family medicine physicians, internal medicine physicians, and APPs.Practice type .included: 1) Academic medical center, 2) Hospital-based practice (including hospitals and military, postoperative care, and long-term care facilities) 3) Private practice/group practice, 4) Community health/safety net setting (included federally qualified or community health centers, Planned Parenthoods, Public health departments, and college health centers).Geographic location included four United States (US) regions (Northeast, South, Midwest, West); 9% of respondents who did not provide state or zip code were classified as non-responders.

COVID-19 and Pandemic-related Behaviors and Practice Patterns
The survey item used for our primary outcome assessed perceptions of how the pandemic affected cervical cancer screening practices [doing fewer; the same number; or more HPV screens than before the pandemic].Participants were also asked to indicate whether they performed colposcopy (yes/no).Those who performed colposcopy then answered questions on how the pandemic affected their practices for (a) colposcopy (doing fewer; the same number; or more colposcopies than before the pandemic); and (b) loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) (provided LEEP on site before the pandemic and still doing so at same capacity; provided LEEP on site before the pandemic and still doing but at reduced capacity; provided LEEP on site before the pandemic and now are referring to another facility; have always referred to another facility for LEEP and continue to do so).

Qualitative interview development, content, and interview processes
The qualitative interview guide was developed based on Cabana's Guideline Based Practice Improvement Framework. 18The draft interview guide was reviewed by an expert panel (n=7) including clinicians from multiple primary care specialties.The interview guide was then refined based on expert feedback, pilot tested in a mock interview, further revised, and finalized.The final interview guide included items focusing on several aspects of cervical cancer screening and management of abnormal results.This manuscript focuses on qualitative findings relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on screening and abnormal results follow-up.Pandemic-related items focused on how the pandemic changed cervical cancer screening practices, pauses to screening or abnormal follow-up (colposcopy or treatment services) approaches for patients who missed screening or follow-up appointments during the pandemic, including strategies for reengagement.Three co-authors (HF, RBP, AM) trained in qualitative methodology and with expertise in cervical cancer screening conducted qualitative interviews via video conference between June and December 2021.
Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim.
This study was approved by Moffitt Cancer Center's Scientific Review Committee and was reviewed by an Institutional Review Board.The study was given exempt determination by Moffitt's IRB, Advarra (MCC #20048), and Boston University's IRB (BMC IRB# H-41533).All study participants viewed (for surveys) or were read (for interviews) an information sheet in lieu of reading and signing an informed consent form.

Analytic plan
Quantitative analyses.We assessed descriptive statistics of clinician and practice characteristics and behaviors.We conducted separate binomial logistic regressions examining the associations of clinician and practice characteristics with responses to items assessing the impact of the pandemic on reported number of cervical cancer screening and on colposcopies (doing the same or more versus fewer than before the pandemic).Age, race, ethnicity, gender, region, clinician type, and practice type were included in the full model for each outcome.[23][24] Quantitative analyses were conducted in SPSS Version 26.
Qualitative analyses.Pandemic-related qualitative interview items were coded using thematic content analysis. 25A priori codes were developed based on the questions in the initial interview guide and a codebook was developed to operationalize and define each code.The qualitative analysis team independently reviewed the data twice.In the first coding pass, the team hand coded the data with the initial codes and made notes on possible new codes.After the first round of coding, they discussed notes on possible new codes.After reaching consensus, the codes were revised and they again independently reviewed the transcripts and updated code categories from the first coding pass.The second coding pass serves to "clean up" codes unanticipated in the first coding pass and identify emergent themes not identified in the initial coding scheme. 26l transcripts were coded by at least two coders.Coding discrepancies were resolved by discussion in weekly group meetings to achieve consensus.Coding was conducted in a shared data sheet for ease of completing coding in a centralized database across varying institutions.

Quantitative Findings
Potential participants (N=1,373) viewed the study information sheet and completed screening items; 103 were ineligible due to not performing cervical cancer screening or having an ineligible training/specialty (e.g., pharmacy).Nineteen additional responses were removed as duplicates, nonsensical write-in responses, or ineligibility not previously identified via demographic items, resulting in a final sample of 1,251 participants (509 recruited via NPWH (web), 524 from Dynata (web), and 218 from ASCCP (204 mail, 14 web).).About half of participants were women's health nurse practitioners or other APPs specializing in women's health (48.7%), one quarter were OB/GYN physicians (26.6%), and the remainder were internal (8.7%) and family medicine (16.0%) physicians.Over half of clinicians (54.0%, n=675) indicated that they perform colposcopies.Colposcopist characteristics were generally comparable to those of the full sample (Table 1).Of note, colposcopists were slightly older (32% aged 50 to 59; 29% aged 60+), and more often OB/GYN physicians (47.0%), compared with the full sample.
Table 2 details participants' perceptions of their performance of screening, colposcopy, and LEEP at the time of the survey, which was conducted between March and August 2021 (fewer, same, more than before the pandemic).Responses indicated that, over one year into the pandemic, 47% of all clinicians reported they were currently performing fewer cervical cancer screenings than before the pandemic and 44.1% of colposcopists were performing fewer colposcopies than prior to the pandemic.Among colposcopists, about one-fifth reported disruptions in LEEP; 18.6% reported performing fewer LEEPs than prior to the pandemic, while 1.3% reported no longer being able to offer LEEP at their facility and therefore referring all patients out who required this service.The remaining colposcopists either reported performing LEEP at the same level (51.1%) or continued to refer out (28.9%).
Similarly, although the overall association between practice type and perceived colposcopy reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.266), clinicians in public health/safety net settings reported reduced colposcopy more often than their peers in private practice (aOR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.005-2.527,p = .048).

Qualitative Interview Findings
A subset of 55 clinicians participated in qualitative interviews.The demographic characteristics of the qualitative interview sub-sample resembled that of the full sample (Table 1); they were primarily White (70%), non-Hispanic (96%), and female (69%).More than one-third (38.5%) were APPs, 29% were OB/GYN physicians, and the remainder were internal (11%) and family medicine (22%) physicians; about half (47%) indicated they perform colposcopies.Table 5 illustrates themes described by clinicians related to perceived screening and colposcopy changes connected with the COVID-19 pandemic, along with exemplar quotes.Themes included reductions in screening, rebound to pre-pandemic levels, and tracking systems for patient follow-up.Nearly all clinicians described reductions in screening early in the pandemic.Sub-themes included closures of primary care services, prioritization of acute problems over well visits, prioritization of abnormal Pap test results over routine screening, patient fears of contracting COVID-19 if they visited a medical setting, and the shift to telehealth limiting in person services.One clinician stated: "My clinic was stopping…annual wellness exams for a sixmonth time period.So, there were a lot of patients that were kind of put off during that time period" (APP, practice not specified).Another described prioritization of colposcopy visits based on the severity of the Pap result: "As soon as we were able to provide those services, we prioritized the visit based on the Pap result.So, high-grade had a high priority to come in for the colpo[scopy] before the low grade" (APP, private practice).
Another described both the impact of telemedicine and prioritization of illness over wellness care: "At the beginning of the pandemic, we were exclusively telemedicine for a few months and then as we were opening up office visits, cervical cancer screening was not the highest priority.It was more so our chronic care patients" (MD/DO family medicine, safety net setting).Participants also described patient concerns: "They don't wanna come into the health department because they think we're full of COVID germs or something" (APP, safety net setting).Others noted that patient volumes had not recovered: "It is still a little less.I would say 80% now compared to before COVID" (MD/DO internal med, private practice).
In contrast, a few clinicians stated that services were never curtailed due to the pandemic, and several felt that screening had rebounded, or in some cases exceeded, pre-pandemic levels: "Last year, we had less patients coming back for physicals.With COVID, they weren't coming.I think people are catching up now.This year, we're seeing more volume.More patients coming for their annuals and their Pap smears; I think we are back up to the pre COVID volume" (MD/DO family medicine, private practice).Some described feeling inundated with cervical cancer screening: "I'm just the non-stop Pap clinic" (APP, safety net setting).Some clinicians noted that patients were less fearful of attending medical care after widespread vaccination.
. When asked what prompted patients to return for screening, clinicians reported a range of practices related to patient outreach and tracking systems.Some clinicians reported using the electronic medical record to outreach to patients, though more reported using a combination of patient lists and outreach via staff phone calls: "We still maintained our rescreen list and our no-show list, and we recalled those patients" (APP, safety net setting).Concerningly, several clinicians did not believe they had a reliable system for tracking patients who had missed screenings: "Once they cancel or don't show up, they do lose the follow up" (MD/DO OB/Gyn, private practice), or were unaware of what system their staff might be using to track missed screenings.Some indicated that patients were responsible for making and rescheduling appointments: "We just sent people notices saying 'she's [the doctor's] back in the office.Hook up if you need to'" (APP, private practice).

Discussion
We examined quantitative and qualitative data related to the perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening and abnormal follow-ups in a large, national sample of clinicians who provide these services.Over one year into the pandemic, almost half of clinicians still reported a reduction in cervical cancer screenings (47%) and colposcopies (44%) as compared to the time preceding the pandemic.
These findings are salient because at the time of our study most lockdown restrictions had been lifted and healthcare institutions had returned to near pre-pandemic level of operations, albeit with masking and social distancing in place.Qualitative themes indicated that some clinicians' patient screening volumes were similar to or exceeding pre-pandemic levels as they caught up on backlogs, while others were slower to return to prepandemic cervical cancer screening and management.Many faced challenges associated with follow-up and tracking systems for overdue patients.
Clinician age, race, clinician type, and practice setting were significantly associated with reports of performing fewer cervical cancer screenings during the pandemic.Clinicians over age 60 more often reported fewer screenings than younger clinicians.This could indicate that older clinicians were more cautious in returning to in-person care such as cervical cancer screenings, perhaps due to their own health concerns over age-related susceptibility to severe COVID-19 complications. 27Internal and family medicine physicians more often reported reduced cervical cancer screening compared with OB/GYN physicians.The need for internal and family medicine physicians to care for COVID-19 patients and other acute health issues may have impacted their ability to provide preventive or well care, 28 including cervical cancer screening screenings. 29We .also found that clinicians in safety net settings like community health centers and health departments more often reported reduced screenings and colposcopies during the pandemic.Concerningly, this may indicate worsening disparities in cancer prevention care in settings that serve patients with the highest cervical cancer rates: lower resourced and historically marginalized communities. 30These findings are supported by recent literature indicating that federally qualified health center settings suffered staffing losses and other challenges during the pandemic which led to reductions in cancer screenings due to postponement of preventive care. 31nally, we found that Asian and Black clinicians had a higher likelihood of reporting reduced cervical cancer screenings compared to White clinicians, independent of other factors such as age, gender, region, medical specialty, and practice setting.There is a paucity of literature on differences in screening practices by clinician race/ethnicity, and additional research would be helpful to further explore these findings.
When focusing only on clinicians who perform colposcopy, we found that internal medicine physicians more often reported reduced colposcopies compared to other specialties.The need for internal medicine physicians to address more acute patient issues may have contributed to reported reductions in both screening and colposcopy.We also found that male clinicians more often reported reduced colposcopy than female clinicians.Some practices and/or states have varying guidelines around chaperone requirements during pelvic exams and procedures, which may have impacted the ability to perform colposcopy.This finding warrants further exploration.Our data also indicated reductions in providing office-based treatment for cervical precancer (e.g., LEEP).In some offices the extra staffing and cleaning associated with performing a LEEP may have led to reduced availability or a need to refer out to another facility during the pandemic.Together these findings highlight perceived reductions in cervical cancer preventive care overall, but were more prevalent among certain specialties and practice settings.Further research is needed to confirm and explore these findings.
Qualitative interview findings provide insight into factors that contributed to screening reductions, as well as the trajectory of care in different phases of the pandemic.Participants highlighted strategies used to mitigate the impact of clinic closures or reduced capacity during the pandemic, including prioritization of seeing patients with high-grade abnormal results during periods when care was restricted. 5,13As COVID-19-related restrictions were lifted, clinicians described implementing extended weekday hours or weekend screening only clinics as they caught up on screenings and compensated for social distancing/reduced capacity restrictions.
The introduction or expansion of telehealth during the pandemic was described as helpful with addressing acute concerns while minimizing infection risk.Consistent with prior literature, however, clinicians reported that telemedicine hindered cervical cancer screening because patients were not physically attending clinic where opportunistic screening could occur. 16turn to screening and the ability to recall overdue patients varied greatly.Some clinicians described an overabundance of patients returning to clinical care, while others described challenges with reaching patients who were overdue for screening or follow-up care for abnormal results.Several described staffing shortages that impacted screening, consistent with rapid turnover and a reduction in the healthcare workforce since the beginning of the pandemic. 15,32While some clinicians reported having a formal tracking system to determine which patients need screening and follow-up, others emphasized limitations of tracking and outreach, such as electronic medical record limitations and the time-intensive burden of outreach for staff.
Several clinicians were unaware of whether they had a tracking system for overdue screenings, or how patient recall was implemented.
Together these findings highlight perceived reductions in cervical cancer preventive care throughout the cancer prevention continuum of screening, diagnosis via colposcopy, and treatment via LEEP.If not addressed, reductions in cancer prevention services could lead to increased cancer incidence in the future.
Reductions were reported overall, but were more prevalent among internal medicine physicians and safety net settings of care.Because current cervical cancer screening requires an in-person exam and sometimes a chaperone, it is relatively labor-intensive process for primary care clinicians compared to other screenings that require only laboratory orders or referrals.The ability for patients to self-collect vaginal specimens for HPV testing could be one method of reducing workforce burden and increasing access to cervical cancer screening. 33[36] This study has several inherent strengths and weaknesses.As noted in our prior work (under review), this sample includes both primary care and OB/GYN physicians, and APPs who conduct cervical cancer screening across various practice settings and regions of the US.We worked with both ASCCP and NPWH in order to ensure sufficient samples of both physicians who perform colposcopy and APPs, who are often overlooked in clinician surveys.Survey data were supplemented with more in-depth exploration via qualitative interviews; the large sample of survey respondents coupled with a relatively large qualitative sample eliciting rich responses are core strengths of this study.Although not originally targeted at assessing changes in screening and colposcopy during the pandemic, we included items to assess provider perceptions of these impacts because of early literature suggesting a drop in screenings with slow rebound. 6,14Finally, to our knowledge, this is the first US report detailing changes in colposcopy practices during the pandemic, a unique addition to the literature.These strengths are tempered by some limitations.The majority of the sample were White and non-Hispanic, although these characteristics reflect characteristics of healthcare providers in the US. 37Next, 9% of the full sample did not respond to geographic location items.Region and associated political leaning were factors in pandemic-related public health guidelines, clinic closings, and reductions in patient volume, thus this gap in data may have limited our ability to detect differences surrounding region-and pandemic-related differences in screening and colposcopy.
These findings highlight that nearly half of clinicians reported performing fewer cervical cancer screenings and colposcopies compared to before the pandemic.This is particularly concerning as this survey occurred more than one year into the pandemic, after lockdowns had been lifted and when widespread vaccination was available.Persistent reductions in screening and colposcopy could lead to increases in cervical cancer incidence in the near future.Additional research should track whether cervical cancer screening services have continued to recover, and whether inequities in recovery exist that could worsen cervical cancer disparities.
. Table 1.Demographic and practice characteristics for the full sample of respondents, and sub-groups of colposcopists and qualitative interview participants.

Total Sample
Colposcopist 1 Due to small numbers, transgender/non-binary/other were unable to be analyzed as their own category.They were assigned to female for analyses because female was the most common response.No difference was noted when grouped with male. 2 Due to small numbers, the following categories were combined: Mixed race n=36, Hawaiian/AAPI n= 3, American Indian/Alaska Native n=3, Other n=22."Most people have had their wellness exam delayed because we're seeing patients -we will give priority to patients with problems."(APP, private practice) De-prioritization of screening/ focus on abnormal follow-up "Knowing that pap smears and dysplasia don't progress fast, we did postpone and delay for a period of time, it was three to six months from what I recall during the early days of the pandemic."(MD/DO Ob/Gyn, academic medical center) "For the people who needed them, they were getting them throughout, not those, not those first three months unless it was a CIN-2 or higher, but if it was a CIN-1 we were like, let's just wait a few more months… see what's going on with COVID at that point."(APP, private practice) Patient fear of attending medical care "You can only do so much; patients are scared to come to doctors' offices for screening test.If it's not urgent or not emergent, very few patients actually want to go to a healthcare setting."(MD/DO int med, private practice) "We still have a significant number who are not comfortable with an in-office visit unless they need something like their birth control pill or something else" (APP, private practice) Telehealth reduces screening "We do telehealth but obviously -we can possibly do STD health and STD screenings on telehealth, but aside from that unless there's some symptomatic issues that we can try to take care of over the telehealth platform, we -there's just been a lot less women coming into the office over the last year due to COVID." (MD/DO fam med, private practice) "I'm sure the Pap smear volume is much more you know, reduced due to the Telemedicine.And so that's one effect of COVID.It's reduced COVID, yeah it reduced the Pap smear."(MD/DO int med, private practice) Patient volumes remain below pre-COVID levels "The rate of visits and doing their regular checkups, not only cancer screening has dropped significantly, more than 75% during the year of COVID.I'm sure that the results of these problems will arise in the next few years, if not, decades; We're almost back 80%, so we're still 20% lower than…usually we see at this time of the year."(MD/DO fam med, private practice) "Getting patients into the office has been challenging because we were doing more telemedicine visits, not as many in-person visits, and the perceived need of preventative care had changed during COVID as well."(MD/DO fam med, safety net setting) Rebound in screening to prepandemic levels Offered cervical cancer screening and colposcopy throughout pandemic "Absolutely no impact because we were open throughout, and I was doing full scope everything, because we just… staggered patients.And so we were just working longer hours with time in between patients and cleaning up and so absolutely no impact."(MD/DO Ob/Gyn, safety net setting) "There was an executive order by the governor who said there will be no elective surgeries done.And, you know, there are, there are people that said, "Oh, well, colposcopy is like an elective office surgery, theoretically.Or a LEEP is--" And I said, screw that.I created a form saying in my opinion, you know, delaying this biopsy or delaying this treatment may cause whatever abnormality [to] worsen."(MD/DO Ob/Gyn, private practice) Patients willing to come in once services were restored "Now we do have come in and… we're almost back to regular business except for masking.So, I would say now, it's just no different than it was before."(APP, safety net setting) "Instead of doing 10 annuals a day, probably three annuals a day throughout COVID before vaccination, then after vaccination, people started coming in in droves for their annuals."(APP, private practice) Increased screening to compensate for patient backlogs "Literally, from June [2021], it started backed up open full force.I have more patients that I had before."(MD/DO Ob/Gyn, practice type not specified) "I will say that coming back off a furlough we might, not only my schedules, our schedules are packed, so we were kind of making up for lost time."(APP, private practice) "So, we do outreach and do pap clinics on Saturdays to help folks get caught up." (APP, safety net setting) Patients no longer afraid of COVID 'They became more complacent.So, now, they are not as afraid.;So, well, that may have helped the screening process, but it may not help the fact that they are going to get infected.(MD/DO int med, private practice) "You know we are in Alabama.People here don't think we have COVID even though they die with the same numbers as everybody else." (APP, academic medical center) Patient tracking and outreach Active follow-up system "We can run lists based on who needs annual wellness visits, who needs mammograms, who needs Pap smears, who needs diabetic follow up, -you name it, we can run the list.And so, since we opened back up …We have people that call [patients].…that's their job."(APP, practice type not specified) "I think we've got dedicated staff actually run through the charts and see who has missed their well-woman exams, and they either make a phone call or send a postcard."(MD/DO fam med, private practice) Limitations of tracking/ follow-up systems [There was a list] "but that's gone by the wayside.I don't know how they did that.They were like, 'Oh, we're going to call all the old people [previous patients]…'.I don't know if that worked."(APP, practice type not specified) "We're trying to call, to arrange for phone calls to get them back, but of course, it's very time, labor consuming process to go through each patient see when was the last time they were here.The good thing is we start implementing the year before COVID, the Epic, myChart portal.You can adjust it to send the patient's notification when their checkups are due.From there, of course at least 50% of our population, they are not tech savvy.They don't check that on regular basis, but we try to reach as much as we can.It's definitely a challenging issue based on human factor and administrative factors, too."(MD/DO fam med, private practice) "We are being proactive and our EMR will send the messages and reminders.But specifically, for patients who didn't come last year, we do not have a system."(MD/DO fam med, private practice) "It's up to the patient to kind of know that they needed a Pap test or a colposcopy or something like that and then make an appointment."(MD/DO Ob/Gyn, practice type not specified) EMR facilitates tracking "We have a portal that our patients have access to.Once we knew that [COVID-19] vaccination was really prevalent in our area… then we, through the portal, sent out a mass announcement to everyone."(MD/DO Ob/Gyn, private practice) "In my PracticeSuite, I have this alert system.So, somebody who has an abnormal pap… I put an alert in... and then it will pop up, and then I just call them."(APP, safety net setting)

Table 2 .
COVID-19 and pandemic related responses for the full sample of respondents and for colposcopists.

Table 3 .
Final model of clinician and practice characteristics associated with odds of reporting reduced cervical cancer screenings during the COVID-19 pandemic (March-July 2021) (N=1239).Using backward selection, the following variables sequentially fell out of the model (p > .10): 1) gender 2) ethnicity.(A priori we planned to retain clinician type, practice type, and region even when p > .10.)

Table 4 .
Final model of clinician and practice characteristics associated with odds of reporting reduced colposcopies during the COVID-19 pandemic (March-July 2021) for colposcopists only (N=669).Using backward selection, the following variables sequentially fell out of the model (p > .10): 1) ethnicity 2) race 3) age.(A priori we planned to retain clinician type, practice type, and region even when p > .10.)