An International Consensus Definition for Contextual Factors: Findings from a Nominal Group Technique

Emerging literature suggests contextual factors are important components of therapeutic encounters and may substantially influence clinical outcomes of a treatment intervention. At present, a single consensus definition of contextual factors, which is universal across all health-related conditions is lacking. The objective of this study was to create a consensus definition of contextual factors to better refine this concept for clinicians and researchers. The study used a multi-stage virtual Nominal Group Technique (vNGT) to create and rank contextual factor definitions. Nominal group techniques are a form of consensus-based research, and are beneficial for identifying problems, exploring solutions and establishing priorities. The 10 international vNGT participants had a variety of clinical backgrounds and research specializations and were all specialists in contextual factors research. The initial stages of the vNGT resulted in the creation of 14 independent contextual factor definitions. After a prolonged discussion period, the initial definitions were heavily modified, and 12 final definitions were rank ordered by the vNGT participants from first to last. A sixth round was used to identify a final consensus, which reflected the complexity of contextual factors and included three primary domains: 1) an overall definition; 2) qualifiers that serve as examples of the key areas of the definition; and 3) how contextual factors may influence clinical outcomes. Our consensus definition of contextual factors seeks to improve the understanding and communication between clinicians and researchers. These are especially important in recognizing their potential role in moderating/mediating clinical outcomes.

Introduction study of contextual effects research. Similar to the OMERACT group, we endeavored to identify 112 a consensus definition that reflects the complexity of contextual factors and describe how 113 contextual factors may influence clinical outcomes, but were also interested in a more detailed 114 set of qualifiers that serve as examples of the key areas of the definition.   further details about any ideas that were produced during stage three. The moderator ensured that 150 each person was able to contribute and that all ideas were discussed without spending too long 151 on a single idea. At this stage, participants were able to suggest new items for discussion or . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

Results
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint Contextual factors are the context elements always presented during the patient's interaction with the healthcare provider. They are involved in the placebo or nocebo effects and can influence the therapeutic outcomes. Some examples of them are: (1) the clinician's features (e.g., professionalism, mindset and appearance), (2) the patient's features (e.g., beliefs, previous experiences and expectations), 3) the patient clinician relationship (e.g., the words, gestures and behavior), 4) the characteristics of the treatment (e.g., the rituality, the invasiveness and the marketing), and 5) the overall healthcare setting (e.g., furniture, the architectural design and the overall impression of the clinic).
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

Two
Contextual factors are elements of the context that accompanies the administration of a treatment (active or placebo). These elements can change the effectiveness of the treatment in a positive (placebo effect) or negative (nocebo effect) way. Contextual factors can be labeled as internal, external or relational.
• Internal factors consist of memories, emotions, expectations and psychological and genetic characteristics of the patient involved in the therapy.

•
External factors include the physical aspects of therapy, such as the kind of treatment (e.g. pharmacological or manual) and the place in which the treatment is delivered.

•
Relational factors are represented by all the social cues that characterize the patient-physiotherapist relationship, such as the verbal information that the physiotherapist gives to the patient, the communication style or the body language.

Three
Contextual factors are past and present environmental cues perceived by individuals either consciously or unconsciously that have the capacity to alter the prediction of future events including outcomes of therapeutic encounters Four Contextual factors are mechanisms through which some treatment effects occur including; factors related to the patient such as their expectations and beliefs; the therapist such as their personality, preferences, and beliefs, and the interaction between the therapist and the patient such as the strength of their relationship. Contextual factors are the mechanisms through which placebo and nocebo effects occur; however, clinically, contextual factors reflect mechanisms underlying treatment effects as opposed to placebo/nocebo effects. Contextual factors do not result in general, non-specific effects of interventions. Rather, contextual factors result in specific effects dependent on the individual beliefs of the patient and provider for a specific intervention.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint states. Such estimations can influence central sensory processing in such a way as to make such estimated sensory states true for the individual.

Eleven
The context of an action includes all micro, meso, and macro environmental factors (i.e., natural, sensorial, temporal, built, economic, political, cultural, social) and personal factors of individuals, groups and populations involved in the expression of the action being analyzed.

Twelve
Contextual factors are everything verbal and non-verbal outside of the therapeutic intervention that is experienced by the patient in relation to personal and environmental interaction during the clinical encounter. These include internal (patient expectations, emotions, etc.), external (facility, treatment room etc.) and relational factors (clinician-patient interaction, staff-patient interaction, etc,).

Thirteen
Contextual factors are the context in which any therapeutic treatment occurs and iteratively influence the trajectory of any health-related outcome. These include the current environment as well as current and historical physical, emotional, social, and cultural experiences that affect both patient and provider behavior, interactions, and expectations throughout the course of care.

Fourteen
Contextual factors are the external factors around a treatment. Any treatment is given not in a vacuum. The clinical setting, the patientclinician including patient-caregiver-clinician interactions, occur within a specific context (where, when, and how). The contextual factors are external factors. Psychosocial factors are internal factors, which complement the contextual factors.
189 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint At the end of Stage four (consolidation of ideas), there were 12 definitions that were rank 191 ordered (Table 3). Three definitions were clearly ranked higher than (Table 4) the remaining nine   192 with the majority (80%) of the vNGT selecting these choices as one of the top three selections. 193 These three were similar in content and scope and finished with mean "ranked" scores of 3.0, 3.7 194 and 3.8 respectively. Following a further poll of the group it was felt that it was necessary to vote 195 again (Round six), but to only include the three aforementioned definitions. Upon re-vote, one 196 clear winner was identified.

Table 3. Modified Contextual Factor Definitions (Upon Completion of Stage Four)
Definition Number

Definition One
Contextual factors (CFs) are components of the therapeutic encounter whereby interventions, medications, pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments are given. CFs encompass the patient and provider personal (i.e., race/ethnicity and expectations), historical (i.e., clinical history and prior experiences), cultural (i.e., social norms, spirituality/religion and power differentials), environmental (i.e., settings and rituals), physical (i.e., sensorial perception and clinical procedures), and rhetorical (i.e., verbal and non-verbal elements of communication) dimensions around the therapeutic encounter and the patient-clinician interaction influencing moderators/mediators of therapeutic mechanisms and the response to any interventions/treatments and ultimately, the overall clinical outcomes. CFs can change the effectiveness of the treatment in a positive (placebo effect) or negative (nocebo effect) way.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

Two
Contextual factors (CFs) are components of the therapeutic encounter whereby interventions, medications, pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments are given. CFs encompass the patient and provider personal (e.g., race/ethnicity, genetic variables, expectations, values and preference), historical (e.g., clinical history, prior experiences), cultural (e.g., social norms, spirituality/religion and power differentials), environmental (e.g., settings and rituals), physical (e.g., sensorial perception, clinical examination and modalities in which the therapy is delivered), and rhetorical (e.g., verbal and non-verbal communication) dimensions around the therapeutic encounter and the patient-clinician interaction influencing moderators/mediators of therapeutic mechanisms and the response to any interventions/treatments and ultimately, the overall clinical outcomes. CFs can change the effectiveness of the treatment in a positive (placebo effect) or negative (nocebo effect) way.
Three Contextual factors are mechanisms through which some treatment effects occur including; factors related to the patient such as their expectations and beliefs; the therapist such as their personality, preferences, and beliefs, and the interaction between the therapist and the patient such as the strength of their relationship. Contextual factors are the mechanisms through which placebo and nocebo effects occur; however, clinically, contextual factors reflect mechanisms underlying treatment effects as opposed to placebo/nocebo effects. Contextual factors do not result in general, non-specific effects of interventions. Rather, contextual factors result in specific effects dependent on the individual beliefs of the patient and provider for a specific intervention.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Five
Contextual factors are physical, psychological and social elements that characterize the therapeutic encounter with the patient. They are actively interpreted by the patient and are capable of eliciting expectations, memories and emotions that, in turn, can influence the health-related outcome, producing placebo or nocebo effects.

Six
Contextual factors are cues or information of the clinical or experimental context that accompanies the administration of a treatment. These elements are perceived and actively interpreted by the patient's brain.

Seven
Contextual factors represent the whole atmosphere around the therapy; the context that accompanies any healthcare treatment.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

Eight
Contextual factors (CFs) are components of all therapeutic encounters and may constitute the entirety of the perceived effects of the intervention itself or be additive to effects of interventions such as pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. CFs are perceived cues that affect both the patient and practitioner and can arise from experiences and immediate dynamics within the encounter, or a combination of both. CFs fall into broad categories that can include patient characteristics, practitioner characteristics, treatment characteristics, characteristics of the dynamic between the patient and practitioner and characteristics of the setting within which the encounter is being delivered. CFs can be complexly interwoven in the patients and practitioners experience so as to influence what patients and practitioners expect the outcome of the encounter to be. Through such conscious and unconscious expectations, involving a range of specific neurological pathways, CFs can directly impact (both positively and negatively) symptoms and characteristics associated with the presenting condition. The proportion of clinical effects observed associated with CFs can vary from large to small depending on the characteristics of the patient, practitioner, condition and intervention.

Nine
Contextual factors are integral components of a therapeutic encounter and can include environmental factors (e.g., natural, sensorial, temporal, built, economic, political, cultural, social) and personal factors of all individuals involved (e.g., physical, mental, social, cultural) in the therapeutic encounter. Some contextual factors are modifiable and can be targeted in intervention to effect change to personal factors.

Ten
Contextual factors are everything verbal and non-verbal outside of the therapeutic intervention that is experienced by the patient in relation to personal and environmental interaction during the clinical encounter. These include internal (e.g. patient expectations, emotions, cultural), external (e.g. facility ambience, environment) and relational (e.g. clinician/staff-patient interaction, social, physical, historical) factors that impact moderators/mediators of therapeutic outcomes.
. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

Eleven
Contextual factors are moderating/mediating components of the therapeutic encounter that influence the trajectory of a health-related outcome. These include the current therapeutic environment as well as current and historical physical, emotional, social, and cultural experiences that affect both patient and provider behavior, interactions, and expectations throughout the course of care.

Twelve
Contextual factors are components of the therapeutic encounter whereby interventions, medications, pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments are given. Contextual factors encompass the patient and provider personal (e.g., race/ethnicity, expectations, values and preference), historical (e.g., clinical history, prior experiences), cultural (e.g., social norms, spirituality/religion and power differentials), environmental (e.g., settings and rituals), physical (e.g., sensorial perception, and clinical examination), and rhetorical (e.g., verbal and non-verbal communication) dimensions around the therapeutic encounter and the patient-clinician interaction influencing moderators/mediators of therapeutic mechanisms and the response to any interventions/treatments and ultimately, the overall clinical outcomes.

First
Contextual factors are components of the therapeutic encounter whereby interventions, medications, pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments are given. Contextual factors encompass the patient and provider personal (e.g., race/ethnicity, expectations, values and preference), historical (e.g., clinical history, prior experiences), cultural (e.g., social norms, spirituality/religion and power differentials), environmental (e.g., settings and rituals), physical (e.g., sensorial perception, and clinical examination), and rhetorical (e.g., verbal and non-verbal communication) dimensions around the therapeutic encounter and the patient-clinician interaction influencing moderators/mediators of therapeutic mechanisms and the response to any interventions/treatments and ultimately, the overall clinical outcomes.
3.0 / 2.0 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint

Second
Contextual factors (CFs) are components of all therapeutic encounters and may constitute the entirety of the perceived effects of the intervention itself or be additive to effects of interventions such as pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. CFs are perceived cues that affect both the patient and practitioner and can arise from past experiences and immediate dynamics within the encounter, or a combination of both. CFs fall into broad categories that can include patient characteristics, practitioner characteristics, treatment characteristics, characteristics of the dynamic between the patient and practitioner and characteristics of the setting within which the encounter is being delivered. CFs can be complexly interwoven in the patients and practitioners experience so as to influence what patients and practitioners expect the outcome of the encounter to be. Through such conscious and unconscious expectations, involving a range of specific neurological pathways, CFs can directly impact (both positively and negatively) symptoms and characteristics associated with the presenting condition. The proportion of clinical effects observed associated with CFs can vary from large to small depending on the characteristics of the patient, practitioner, condition and intervention.
3.7 / 3.0 . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.16.22283573 doi: medRxiv preprint

Third
Contextual factors (CFs) are components of the therapeutic encounter whereby interventions, medications, pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments are given. CFs encompass the patient and provider personal (e.g., race/ethnicity, genetic variables, expectations, values and preference), historical (e.g., clinical history, prior experiences), cultural (e.g., social norms, spirituality/religion and power differentials), environmental (e.g., settings and rituals), physical (e.g., sensorial perception, clinical examination and modalities in which the therapy is delivered), and rhetorical (e.g., verbal and non-verbal communication) dimensions around the therapeutic encounter and the patientclinician interaction influencing moderators/mediators of therapeutic mechanisms and the response to any interventions/treatments and ultimately, the overall clinical outcomes. CFs can change the effectiveness of the treatment in a positive (placebo effect) or negative (nocebo effect) way.  is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.16.22283573 doi: medRxiv preprint encounter is being delivered. This suggests that who is enrolled in a study, who provides care in a 234 study, and where that study is performed may influence clinical outcomes. Because of this, 235 studies require careful discussion on these aspects in their methodology and a discussion of their 236 potential to influence outcomes in their results. , we were able to consolidate many disparate initial thoughts to common themes 253 within the two-hour timeframe. When properly employed, consensus agreement methods create 254 structured environments for which experts are prompted to give the best available information, 255 allowing solutions to problems that may remain otherwise unsolved [26]. This requires the . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint    Identifying provisional generic contextual factor domains for clinical trials in . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.  . CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) preprint The copyright holder for this this version posted December 19, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.16.22283573 doi: medRxiv preprint